<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Group Competition Incentive Pros and Cons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leapcomp.com/2008/02/group-competition-incentive-pros-and-cons.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leapcomp.com/2008/02/group-competition-incentive-pros-and-cons.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 23:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://leapcomp.com/2008/02/group-competition-incentive-pros-and-cons.html#comment-34089</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 04:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://julienldionne.wordpress.com/2008/02/07/group-competition-incentive-pros-and-cons/#comment-34089</guid>
		<description>Hi Simon,

Sorry for the late response, your comment got filtered as spam.  Individual performance should be rewarded and I rarely see incentive compensation plans rewarding only team performance, but rewarding individual performance is often unpractical (hard to assign a sales to a single person), and individual incentives also does not reward team work and cooperation which is usually a sought behavior.  

Julien</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Simon,</p>
<p>Sorry for the late response, your comment got filtered as spam.  Individual performance should be rewarded and I rarely see incentive compensation plans rewarding only team performance, but rewarding individual performance is often unpractical (hard to assign a sales to a single person), and individual incentives also does not reward team work and cooperation which is usually a sought behavior.  </p>
<p>Julien</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Oshodi</title>
		<link>http://leapcomp.com/2008/02/group-competition-incentive-pros-and-cons.html#comment-32274</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Oshodi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 03:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://julienldionne.wordpress.com/2008/02/07/group-competition-incentive-pros-and-cons/#comment-32274</guid>
		<description>why not reward everyone based on individual performance?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why not reward everyone based on individual performance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Hebert</title>
		<link>http://leapcomp.com/2008/02/group-competition-incentive-pros-and-cons.html#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Hebert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://julienldionne.wordpress.com/2008/02/07/group-competition-incentive-pros-and-cons/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Relating to the point on relative value of the award.  I'm expanding the results of the study that showed that social comparisons can have a huge effect on how we view what might seem like positive events. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;From a post on &lt;a HREF="http://www.spring.org.uk/2008/01/experiences-beat-possessions-why.php" REL="nofollow"&gt;&lt;br/&gt;PsyBlog&lt;/a&gt;: "One striking example is the finding that people prefer to earn $50,000 a year while everyone else earns $25,000, instead of earning $100,000 themselves and having other people earn $200,000 (Solnick &#038; Hemenway, 1998)."&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I understand the pitfalls associated with transferring results from one study to a completely different application - on the surface I think it holds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Relating to the point on relative value of the award.  I&#8217;m expanding the results of the study that showed that social comparisons can have a huge effect on how we view what might seem like positive events. </p>
<p>From a post on <a HREF="http://www.spring.org.uk/2008/01/experiences-beat-possessions-why.php" REL="nofollow"><br />PsyBlog</a>: &#8220;One striking example is the finding that people prefer to earn $50,000 a year while everyone else earns $25,000, instead of earning $100,000 themselves and having other people earn $200,000 (Solnick &#038; Hemenway, 1998).&#8221;</p>
<p>I understand the pitfalls associated with transferring results from one study to a completely different application - on the surface I think it holds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Hebert</title>
		<link>http://leapcomp.com/2008/02/group-competition-incentive-pros-and-cons.html#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Hebert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 18:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://julienldionne.wordpress.com/2008/02/07/group-competition-incentive-pros-and-cons/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Julien - I posted today on this - more detail on the "how".&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Link here: http://incentive-intelligence.typepad.com/incentive_intelligence/2008/02/class-in-sessio.html&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I think we're in general agreement - group competition can be poorly designed and poorly applied.  However, there are real business reasons for using it.  Thanks for the comments.!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julien - I posted today on this - more detail on the &#8220;how&#8221;.</p>
<p>Link here: <a href="http://incentive-intelligence.typepad.com/incentive_intelligence/2008/02/class-in-sessio.html" rel="nofollow">http://incentive-intelligence.typepad.com/incentive_intelligence/2008/02/class-in-sessio.html</a></p>
<p>I think we&#8217;re in general agreement - group competition can be poorly designed and poorly applied.  However, there are real business reasons for using it.  Thanks for the comments.!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

