Incentive Compensation and Sales Performance Management Survey

Monthly Archive for August, 2008

I don’t want to drive a Ferrari, I want a trip to Hawaii!

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 4 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Non-cash rewards are not a new concept, and are commonly used to motivate employees, reward them for their performance and encourage specific behaviors.

A recent article by Christopher Guly in the summer edition of the Canadian Professional Sales Association’s Contact magazine explains how everybody would want an extra cash bonus at the end of the year, but that it is likely this bonus would be forgotten a few months later. According to Duane Penner, VP of sales at Roadtrips Inc, incentives tied to memorable experiences can make a bigger difference and set a company apart.

Roadtrips create “once-in-a-lifetime” events for salespeople; from five-star strips to the Monaco Grand Prix to Ferrari driving experiences. I think the key to Roadtrips’ program, is that employees have the choice to choose what they want to do, depending on their performance. One could choose a Broadway show in Vegas, or attend the Super Bowl game – it’s up to them.

I say that choice is key, because we have probably all been in a situation where a well intentioned employer rewarded some employee with something that most people didn’t care about: Participation in a golf tournament for non-golfers, a ski weekend for non-skiers, a gift-certificate in a clothing store to someone who hates to shop, a paper weight with the company’s logo on it, or a weekend retreat in a nice hotel (with 10 other co-workers).

Employers are realizing more and more the potential impact of flexible non-cash rewards. That’s the driver for many sales performance management companies to start offering tools to manage these rewards. Last week, Xactly launched its non-cash rewards application on the Force.com platform. This application spans the entire non-cash reward management spectrum, from creating contests for specific employee groups, to attainment tracking, to online redemption of points.
Other companies such as Restaurant.com leverage this trend by offering discounted gift certificates ($25 certificate for $10 or less) to companies looking at creating non-cash reward incentive programs.

Cash versus Non-Cash Rewards
In most scenarios, it is probably safe to assume that a sales person would not be thrilled to have his or her cash bonus replaced by a points program. However, non-cash rewards could be integrated to their total rewards and I have seen them work very well to reward some subjective “performance” such as embodying corporate values.

Using non-cash rewards should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis – it may be a good decision for some organization or for a certain context, but may not be right for everyone.

Perks versus Rewards
If the goal is to distinguish the company, increase motivation, increase employee retention and attract new talents, other non-cash “incentives” can be used. The company where I had the best time working had many perks for the employees such as free pops and juices and pool tables. Google recognized the importance of such perks, and they are especially famous for their free cafeteria. They could have paid every employee $5,000 more, but their employees probably do not look at it this way.

Non-cash rewards, non-cash rewards programs and applications to manage non-cash rewards are quickly emerging. Now could be a good time to determine if it could be a good enhancement to your compensation plans, to remain an attractive employer and increase your workforce’s productivity and motivation!

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Non-Cash Incentives
Motivating your Sales Team to go for the Gold: What can you do to turn your reps into an Olympic sales team?

LeapComp featured in Arcadia Solutions’ Q3 Newsletter

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 3 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

My entry on Offshoring SPM Communication Challenges was featured in Arcadia Solution’s quarterly newsletter.  Arcadia Solutions is a business and technology consulting firm with a division focused on incentive compensation solutions. Their newsletter also has 2 good articles:

 

The first article is called “On-Demand vs. On-Premise - What works for you“.  Arcadia identified 3 key issues which drive this decision: comp plan complexity, technological capacity and data integration complexity. 

 

To this list, as I talked before a few times on this blog, I would add a few more drivers: the cost structure (subscription fee per person per month for on-demand rather than a larger upfront fee, the number of participants, and the number of transactions (on-premise applications can usually handle a bigger load).  On-demand (also called Software-as-a-Service SAAS) offers many other benefits such as generally quicker to go live and easier to implement, frequent automatic updates and lower operating costs.  On-premise SPM solutions can offer more integration flexibility, and more control (such as direct access to the database which is usually not the case with on-demand solutions). 

 

The second article is “Build vs. Buy - How do I Decide What’s Best for my Unique Business” and discusses some of the pros and cons of buying a commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) software versus building  a custom system. 

 

This is something I have not written about, mostly because I didn’t think it was a question companies were still asking themselves, with so many mature COTS solutions available.  Unless there is a need to perform something that a COTS application cannot do, there should be no reason to build a custom application.  If there is something an ICM COTS cannot do, it might be time to review your comp plans!

Tags: , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Webinar: Demystifying the Complexity of Sales Performance Management – Business vs Technology
Incentive Compensation Meets HR at The Super Sexy HR Carnival

MarketScope for Sales Incentive Compensation Management Software 2008

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 3 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Michael Dunne, the VP of research and sales incentive compensation analyst for Gartner, released the new marketscope research on July 30, 2008.

One of his key finding; the sales ICM market grew by 20% in 2007, up from 15% in 2006.  Another interesting fact: collectively, the vendor community only captured 300 million in revenue worldwide. Finally, less than 10% of sales organizations with more than 100 persons receiving variable compensation have deployed prepackaged sales applications, with North America representing more than 80% of the world market.

My interpretation of this is that the ICM market is still very small, still has a lot of room to grow, and has an accelerating growth.  That’s great news for me!

The biggest changes in the overall marketscope rating since 2007 is Varicent which moved up a position, from “promising” to “positive”, and Practique Associates (recently acquired by Merced Systems) which moved up from “Caution” to “Promising”.  This year, ACTEK and Westport Software (now Enterprise Incentive Software) did not meet the inclusion criterion for signing new customers.  There is also a new name on the list - ZS Associates.

I asked Gartner if I could share their ICM Vendor Matrix on this blog, but they refused.  However, I collected the related press releases:

I did not find publicly available information regarding Xactly, ZS Associates and SAP’s ranking.

The rating is based on overall viability, customer experience, products and services, market responsiveness, track record and geographic strategy.  Gartner’s definition for a positive rating is “Demonstrate strength in specific areas, but execution in one or more areas may still be developing or inconsistent with other areas of performance”.  A promising rating is defined as “Shows potential in specific areas; however, execution is inconsistent”.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Insurance Incentive Compensation Management Applications
Enterprise Incentive Management News

Olympics Pay-for-Performance, Cash-for-Medals

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (3 votes, average: 3.33 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Many countries pay incentives and sizeable cash rewards to athletes who win medals at the Beijing Olympics. 

 

Canada: The Beijing Olympics marks the first time Canada’s athletes will receive cash for medals. A gold will be worth $20,000, a silver $15,000 and a bronze $10,000.

 

Philippines: Harry Tanamor is the Philippines’ only boxing hope at the Beijing Games - and if he can bring home the country’s first Olympic gold, he will get a promotion from the rank of sergeant, and a cash bonus, according to the Philippine Armed Forces chief of staff General Alexander Yano.

 

Philippine government is dangling more incentives to the athlete who brings home the country’s first-ever Olympic gold medal, with the pot now worth 15 million pesos ($313,000).

 

Belarus: Belarusian athletes who win gold at Beijing will be provided with meat sausages for the rest of their lives.

 

USA: The United States pays $25,000 US for gold, $15,000 for silver and $10,000 for bronze, while according to the COC Italian athletes earned $180,000 Cdn for winning gold at the 2006 Games in Turin, Italy.

 

Kenya: The President had said that each Kenyan athlete will receive a cash prize of 750,000 shillings forwinning a gold medal, 500,000 shillings for silver and 250,000 shillings for a bronze medal.

 

Russia: Since the 1996 Games in Atlanta, the Russian Olympic Committee has awarded $50,000 for every gold medal won by a Russian but will splash out 100,000 euros ($159,500) to Beijing’s Olympic champions.

 

And the list goes on…  Other countries try the stick approach: 

 

UK: BRITAIN’S Olympic athletes risk having their funding cut if they do not return from Beijing with enough medals.

 

The question is, are those incentives really necessary?  Will these athletes really perform better with these incentives?  I would like to think that if I was an oylmpic athlete, my performance would not be influenced by these incentives.  In some situations I could understand, if winning a gold medal meant the end to poverty.  However in most countries, and most disciplines, I imagine that even if it was not for the official incentive, winning would translate in many endorsement deals.

Secondly, rather than spending money on medals, governments could allocate this money for training instead, which in my mind would be a better investment.   

Are there any medal winners out there?

Tags: , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Super Bowl, Oscars and Olympics
How Much is an Oscar Worth?

nGenError - Mistake 2.0 or Bold Vision?

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 3 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

When Iconixx contacted me to discuss working with them, I was very excited because they focused only on my key area of expertise; sales performance compensation.  I was involved with incentive compensation management, in previous jobs and projects, but there was never a guarantee that my exposure to sales comp would last forever. 

 

About 8 months after I joined Iconixx, they were acquired by BSG Alliance, an on-demand, subscription-based platform company for next generation enterprises.  BSG was on a shopping spree, spending VC money to acquire several companies.  It didn’t take very long for them to get a new catchy name; nGenera. 

 

nGenera really demonstrated their seriousness to penetrate the sales compensation market when they also acquired the on-demand compensation management software company called nCent.  However, this meant the slow death of their focus on 3rd party packaged solution integration, to focus instead on their on-demand product development efforts. 

 

It has been about 3 weeks since I left nGenera to accept another interesting offer.  2 days ago I found out that nGnera decided to accelerate the phasing out of their systems integration business, which meant letting go most of the remaining consultants who came with the Iconixx acquisition.  This was good timing (for me)! 

 

So why do I say nGenError?  Given the background and experience of the people on the nGenera management team, maybe it’s a move that makes sense.  But unfortunately it’s a move that leaves a lot of my friends un-employed. 

 

If you are looking for strong SPM consultants with Callidus or Varicent experience, please contact me.

Tags: ,

Related Posts:
nGenera unit (Talisma CRM) bought…
PlanIt: Another On-Demand Sales Performance Solution

Webinar Summary: Insurance Industry Best Practices

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 3 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Last week I attended the Sales Performance Accenture Webinar on Insurance Industry Best Practices by Jon Walheim, Partner – US Insurance Marketing, Sales and Service and Jason Angelos – Partner, Global Incentive Compensation Management.

Accenture performed a study with insurers and asked them which 3 topics were most important in the overall market place.  54% of the respondents selected “improve sales performance”, 49% selected “increase retention” and 36% selected “improve service performance”.  This says a lot on the focus on sales performance management solutions!

In this same study, Accenture also identified that the highest level of priority regarding customer acquisition and retention was to attract new customer and to focus on retention.  Insurance companies also hope to improve their performance through training, specialized tolls and sales support.

“Imagine if all 15,000 Exclusive Agents exhibit target behavior set XYZ for a customer situation XYZ.  No guessing.  No interpretation.”

Accenture’s framework for targeting value in sales transformation is to increase revenue, decrease cost and improve predictability.  Sales performance management solutions can assist with each of those “levers”.  ICM can impact each of those levers.  Revenues can be increased with increased flexibility in incentive plan design, more insight to data and self-service tools, and analytics.  Costs can be decreased with accurate incentive compensation and easy plan administration.  Predictability can be attained with plan modeling features.

Jon also mentioned that behavior is driven by only three factors: ability, motivation and context.  For an individual to exhibit the proper behavior, he must have the skills and knowledge for the job, and be the right person into the right role.  Performance objectives must be specified and measured, and the person must be motivated and encouraged to show target behaviors.  Finally they must have the right work assigned to them, have the right tolls, and have access to the right information.

Here is another attempt at justifying investing in incentive compensation from a return on investment perspective.  According to Accenture’s research, investments in programs to motivate and reward sales people, have the greatest potential to impact profits.  The impact on better motivating and rewarding people, and at attracting and retaining people could represent 23 $M on pre-tax profit for moving from average to high performance for a 1 billion dollar business unit.

Best practices for ICM Implementations
Accenture made several recommendations for ICM implementations:

  • Simplify operations
  • Optimize controls
  • Don’t try to gain efficiency if it compromises sales performance
  • Strive to develop new capabilities to deliver improved flexibility and speed to market
  • Optimize compensation plans and focus where it counts
  • Improve reporting to increase trust with the end users.
  • Provide single source of sales performance results
  • Manage software vendors to shape future product functionality
  • Enlist a deeply skilled integration partner to increase delivery capability and decrease risk.

I’m glad I took some notes during the presentation, because even if we were told that we could obtain the presentation from Accenture after the webinar, Accenture refused to share it with consulting companies!  You might have more luck than I did by contacting Jon by e-mail here:  jon.walheim@accenture.com

Tags: , , , , ,

Related Posts:
The Haunted Winchester Mystery House