Incentive Compensation and Sales Performance Management Survey

Monthly Archive for November, 2008

SPM Vendor Selection Part 6: Getting Help!

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 3 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

If you go shopping for a new car, and if you don’t know anything about cars, what do you do?  Trust the dealer?  Talk with a few dealers?   Read books and reviews about the cars being considered?  Bring a friend who DOES know something about cars to avoid getting ripped off?  In this last post about vendor selection, I will discuss a few ideas of where it is possible to get some help with the sales performance management vendor selection process.

Get help from a company experienced with vendor selection efforts
Getting help from an unbiased, experienced third party is the most obvious course of action.  This third party will be able to assist you with every step of the process we have discussed so far, from shortlisting the “best” vendors for your requirements, to writing an RFP doing a good job at describing your specific requirements, to helping out with the RFP evaluation and demo evaluation.  I’ll just add a note that I’m regularly involved on vendor selection projects with OpenSymmetry.

Pros: A consulting company with a lot of vendor selection experience will be able to guide you through the process and help you in making the best decision for your specific situation.  They will bring a lot of value by being able to answer your questions, create or review the vendor selection deliverable, provide additional insight about the various vendors/solutions considered and provide expert advice early on in the process.

Cons: Hiring a consultant / consulting company to help out with vendor selection will cost something; sometimes too much for a small budget implementation.  Not all consulting companies are as experienced or as unbiased as they claim they are, so it is important to verify the experience and the company’s reputation.  Checking references and ensuring that a company is not getting any “referral fee” from the vendor selected is also important to ensure there is no bias towards a specific vendor.

Get help from an SPM Vendors
Dean Thomas from Merced Systems discussed earlier this month how valuable it is to involve SPM vendors early in the RFP / requirement gathering process to get a good RFP.  Indeed, most vendors will usually be helpful in providing information and ideas when creating an RFP.

Pros: Vendors usually want to appear to be “good guys” and be on your side during the selection process.  There is much to be said about the importance of developing a good relationship between vendor and client, and helping you here is planting the first seed to what the vendors hope to be a long lasting relationship.

Cons: As I pointed out earlier in a blog comment, getting help from a vendor is a bit of a grey area.  When involving one vendor, other vendors should also be involved to be fair, and this can be complicated.  Involving vendors may also create a notion that some are favored more than others.  Finally, some vendors may also use this opportunity to recommend requirements which may give them an advantage over their competitors.  SPM vendors are familiar with their application, but sometimes they lack the knowledge of other solutions which makes it hard to think out of the box…  even with the best intention they may give an advantage to their solution.

Get help from the Internet
Just stating the obvious, but there is a LOT of information on the Internet about vendor selection, RFP writing, etc.  Good places to start looking for SPM specific information are the vendor’s websites and sales performance management blogs.  Looking at vendor selection deliverable for other software solutions more commonly used than SPM could also be valuable; CRM and ERP solutions are other applications which will share common requirements with a sales performance management solution including security, data, etc.

Pros: The information is free…

Cons: The quality and accuracy of the information can be biased.  For example, many vendors provide pros and cons of on-premise versus on-demand solutions; usually these studies are heavily biased towards influencing customers to select an on-demand solution which is usually more lucrative for the vendor.  Be wary of vendors who require you to share contact and project information before sharing white papers, templates, studies, etc with you.  This is only a sales stunt and you may have a hard time to get rid of their sales team.

Get help from me
If you have any questions or if you would like to brainstorm a few ideas, I would be pleased to talk with you and help out… for free.  The only catch is that I hope you will share this blog around in exchange for the help, and keep me in mind if you ever need help with “real” work.  I promise you won’t be constantly harassed after contacting me :-)  You can reach me by e-mail at julien.dionne@opensymmetry.com or by phone at 613-482-2556.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Resource Center
SPM Vendor Selection Part 5: Reference Calls

“New” Sales Compensation Solution – Makana Motivator Pro

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

I knew about this since a few months, but I was impatiently waiting for the official news to come out before announcing it.  For those of you thinking “wait a minute, you reviewed Makana Motivator already on your blog”, well this is not the same beast.  Makana Motivator was only for plan planning, but Makana Motivator PRO is a self-service solution to not only plan, but also calculate commissions and bonuses.

So with the market starting to feel saturated with SPM solutions, is there place for another one?  I think that there is a place for this one at least…  why?  Because rather than trying to do the same thing as the other SaaS/on-demand solutions, Makana Motivator Pro is for smaller companies.

At $29 per month, and with no implementation fee (it’s supposed to be easy enough to be implemented by anyone), maybe this is the kind of application which is required to convince smaller companies to replace their spreadsheet.

Review coming soon…  I think…

Tags: , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Makana Solutions
Makana Motivator for Free!

SPM Vendor Selection Part 5: Reference Calls

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

As I mentioned in a previous post, the vendor selection process can be very similar to hiring someone.  After the screening interview (RFP), and the in-person interview (demo), it’s now time for the reference check of our top two candidates.

SPM Vendors are usually quick to provide the required references.  I think that in general they are pretty honest, but be concerned if they tell you that the entire implementation was very smooth and if they have nothing bad to say about the solution at all.   When applying for a job, I never provided a reference who would say anything bad about me, and I’d usually prep them about what they should say.  I’m sure these arranged references could be scripted as well.

To avoid the potential for a biased reference, many choose to talk with other companies who implemented the solutions being considered.  Whether you are looking at the vendor’s press releases, or if they provided a client list in the RFP, figuring out who is leading the implementation, or who is responsible for compensation at a certain company is usually not such a hard task.  Conferences are also a good way to meet people who have been through the implementation process, with all the pains involved.

Some reference call questions…
The goal of the reference call is to find out if the experience of others is as rosy as what the vendors may have described it.

This is your chance to find out more about the product, if they are happy with the functionality and usability, some of the pros and cons, upgrades, etc.  It is also a great opportunity to find out more about the actual implementation of the solution; how long did it take (and how long was it supposed to take), any lessons learned, etc.  Finally, a very important piece if to find out how well the vendor is supporting the application post implementation; can they resolve issues and answer questions in a timely manner, where there many issues, how was the experience in general?  Finally, after the RFP and demos, there are probably some areas in which you would like to confirm or validate what the vendors mentioned; is the plan communication tool really worth while?  Are the upgrades really THAT easy?

Evaluation
Some people like to factor in the reference calls in the total evaluation score.  Others use it to validate that a vendor/solution is as good as they think it is.  I don’t think there is a good or a bad way, but there is a risk to think “the reference check will be worth 5% of the overall score and the highest score wins”.  Why?  Because if every person you are calling complain about a horrible product and a horrible experience, it could be a deal breaker!

Next Steps…
The next step is to negotiate pricing with the two vendors.  Usually, the top two vendors are still in the process, because obviously pricing can be a major decision factor, but also because a vendor might be more willing to negotiate pricing and other factors knowing that they still have a competitor.

That’s it!  Smile!  At the end of the negotiations, you should be ready to draft a contract with that vendor to provide the incentive compensation solution!

In my next post I will talk about how to get ready for the implementation of the solution, and where to get help for the entire vendor selection process.

Tags: , , ,

Related Posts:
Resource Center
SPM Vendor Selection Process

nGenera unit (Talisma CRM) bought…

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 4 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

I haven’t talked too much about nGenera yet, mainly because they don’t focus entirely on sales performance management, and also because although they have an SPM solution that looks pretty good, it’s not widely deployed yet. My first post about them was when they laid off a lot of my former colleagues, not long after I left Iconixx/nGenera to join OpenSymmetry.

If you don’t remember the story, nGenera raised $70 million and went on a shopping spree, purchasing several companies last year. Last May they purchased Talisma Corp, which brought together two Oak Investment Partners’ portfolio companies. In that press release, Talisma Chief Executive called the match with nGenera a “perfect fit”.

So I was a bit surprised when I found out today that nGenera was selling the Talisma CRM business. It seems that maybe the fit was not so perfect.  Actually, only the Talisma Customer Relationship Management line product suite, Talisma education business, the Bangalore’s operations, and the Talisma brand name are being purchased.  nGenera will retain ownership of Talisma’s Customer Interaction Management software products and business.

Given how long these deals take and that only 7 months have went by since the acquisition of Talisma by nGenera, it sounds like nGenera may have acquired Talisma with only an interest in the customer interaction management products.

What does this mean for nGenera’s Sales Performance Management focus?  When I read the first release, I thought they decided to sell Talisma entirely, and I interested this as a change of focus from an on-demand everything approach to more focus on research and sales performance management.  When they acquired Talisma, I imagined we would see an integrated CRM and SPM solution in the future.  I’m sure we will see a CRM/SPM solution eventually, but not yet.

Since nGenera is keeping Talisma’s Customer Interaction Management solution, it looks like we can still expect their “on-demand-everything-2.0-high-performance ” strategy which also includes their nGen Total Compensation Solution.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
nGenera
nGenError - Mistake 2.0 or Bold Vision?

SPM Vendor Selection Part 4: Vendor Demos / Interviews

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

In my opinion, this is the most important and valuable part of the sales performance management vendor selection process.  The demos can take different forms; for a small on-demand project, these demos are often performed online.  For a large implementation, the remaining competing vendors will usually send a team on-site to present.  This is the first opportunity to really see the look and feel of the solution. The RFP scores of the invited vendors could be very close, so this is where they get the chance to distinguish themselves.  A job candidate is rarely hired without a face-to-face interview; this is it!

How long should the demo last?
A small SaaS solution such as Xactly or Centive could be presented in a few hours, but it really depends on the complexity of the solution.  The length of the demo also depends on how much time you have and how much time the vendor is willing to invest in trying to win the bid.  My advice is that for a large implementation (Callidus, Varicent, Merced, etc) half a day could be enough for an overview of the application, and a full day is not too much to go a bit more in details.

What questions should be asked?
SPM Vendor should be given specific instructions on what they should be demonstrating, which could vary depending on the audience.  Ask yourself what is of interest to the evaluators; the plan configuration and administration?  Reports?  Analytics?  If the evaluators are managers / directors, showing how the configuration plan elements is done may not be necessary.

Demo Scripts
The best way to find out that an SPM solution can do what you would like it to do, is to ask the vendors to configure a few plans.  Don’t only provide the plan details, also provide some sample data.  The sample data only needs to be a few transactions, there is no point in providing hundreds of them.  When the vendors walk you through their solution and results, it will provide a good overview of how their solution works.  If you choose to ask the vendors to implement a few things for the demo, provide them with at least a week to work on them to ensure they have the time to complete the activity.  It’s fair to ask them to create simple rules “on the spot”, or to modify some of their plans, but if you ask them to implement several plans during the demo, valuable time will be wasted.  Also, keep in mind that the goal is to review the solution, and not the ability of the sales engineer to work under high pressure.

Demo Evaluation
Just like for the RFP, a scoring grid should be created ahead of time and distributed to all the evaluators.  Another tip; leave a lot of space for comments.  If the evaluators have laptops, they could even fill the evaluation in a spreadsheet.  It’s never fun to do manual data entry if it can be avoided.  A question I often get is how much should the demo evaluation be worth compared to the RFP.  This is another “it depends” answer.  Typically, I recommend that the evaluation be worth at least 50% of the total score; if it’s a full day demonstration, probably more…  for a short online demonstration, probably less.

When evaluating the different demos, beware of evaluating the quality of the presentation rather than the quality of the solution.  As we know, some people are very good at presenting, and some are not quite as good.  You would think that sales engineers have all mastered the art of the presentation, but they are not all made equal and some can be better than others.  Try to evaluate the actual solution and not how good the SE is (and that can be hard to do!).

One last note about the demo evaluation:  if the vendor is now showing you what you want to see (even if this should have been made clear before the presentation begins), make sure to let them know, and they can probably adjust the focus of their presentation.

Logistics
If the vendors are coming for an on-site visit, find out of they need an Internet connection.  Also make sure you have a working projector!

A Note for the Vendors Reading This
Don’t rely on the internet connection mentioned above.  Bring your solution installed on a laptop, or even bring a server with you if you need it, but don’t count on this connection to work or to be stable!

Adding the Scores
We now have scores for the RFPs and the demos.  Adding them should reflect who the winner should be.  There are a few more steps before selecting this winner, but once the demos are completed, you should have a good idea of who the preferred vendor is.  Just as with the RFP, I would recommend a debrief following the demos to discuss impressions, strengths, weaknesses, likes, dislikes, etc.  If you had more than 2 vendors presenting, I would recommend selecting the top two vendors for the next steps.

Next Steps
We’re almost there…  we still have to do our due diligence and perform reference checks before we start contract negotiations. I will discuss this in my next post.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Resource Center
SPM Vendor Selection Part 5: Reference Calls

SPM Vendor Selection Part 3: Evaluating RFP Responses

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (3 votes, average: 2.33 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

I hope you were not thinking that all the hard work was over when the RFP was completed; evaluating the responses to the RFP (the proposals) is another big task with many challenges.

  • The proposals are usually fairly thick, and it takes time to go through them. That’s why I recommended doing good upfront work at shortlisting the right vendors. RFP evaluation is a big time commitment, but after putting so much time in writing the RFP, it’s not time to cut corners here.
  • Just as with the actual RFP creation, many people need to be involved in the evaluation process. For example, maybe someone on the “technical side” added a question regarding information security. Each vendor is now listing several measures by how they protect information and how the application was architected with security in mind. This person is likely to be required to evaluate this question because the business team may not know which answer is the best.
  • As with my example above, it is often hard to rate an answer without some knowledge of what these incentive compensation applications can do. Answers can all look very similar.

The goal of the proposal evaluation is to further reduce the number of vendors in the race. The next step is usually the vendor’s demos, but these are time consuming and it’s not practical to have all 3-5 shortlisted vendors selected. A good number of vendors is usually 2 or 3.

Evaluation Methodology
Each proposal evaluator should know ahead of time what is expected from them, and when they should expect to receive the proposals. Along with the proposals, an evaluation grid should be provided. Everyone can try to evaluate every question, but it often makes sense to separate business and technical questions. Each evaluator evaluates the relevant questions and returns the evaluation grid for each proposal to a certain person responsible for consolidating the scores. When every evaluation is received, that person will aggregate all the scores for each question, and create an average. A meeting to discuss the scores can then be scheduled, where any large discrepancy in scores can be discussed (person A gave a low score on a certain question, and person B gave a very high score). As a result, there should be 2 or 3 proposals ahead of the others.

Alternative Evaluation Methods

  • Every evaluator can meet in person and discuss each question. The goal is to come up with a consensus on what the score should be. This method also works, but seems to be more time consuming. Scheduling a meeting with a large group of people often seems to be a challenge.
  • I have seen many proposal evaluations being outsourced entirely, especially on government contracts. I think this is generally a bad idea since this 3rd party does not have a very good knowledge of your requirements, and potentially does not have any knowledge of the sales performance industry. It can be beneficial to get help from a 3rd party when evaluating the proposals, but I wouldn’t recommend relying entirely on this 3rd party.

The key element to evaluate the proposals is to have a well defined evaluation grid. If everyone stick to the same format, it will be much easier and quicker to consolidate the scores, and there should be less ambiguity on how to evaluate each answer.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Resource Center
SPM Vendor Selection Part 4: Vendor Demos / Interviews