<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tips for SaaS Contract Negotiations, and Knowledge Transfer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leapcomp.com/2009/02/tips-for-saas-solution-negotiations-and-knowledge-transfer.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leapcomp.com/2009/02/tips-for-saas-solution-negotiations-and-knowledge-transfer.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 16:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://leapcomp.com/2009/02/tips-for-saas-solution-negotiations-and-knowledge-transfer.html#comment-57606</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 18:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leapcomp.com/?p=813#comment-57606</guid>
		<description>I think your article's subject is one thing (negotiating a SAAS Contract), but then talks about something else (knowledge xfer)...

i.e. 'take it with you'?  Are you kidding?   So tell me, if I customize (rather, configure) my salesforce.com account, if I leave SFDC, how do you propose I 'take it with me?'

Sure...documenting customizations and configuration for future reference is fine, but how is that related to negotiating SaaS contracts?

your colorful brain picture is very pretty, but 'tip 1' is a whole other area of project mgmt and nothing to do with tips 2-5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your article&#8217;s subject is one thing (negotiating a SAAS Contract), but then talks about something else (knowledge xfer)&#8230;</p>
<p>i.e. &#8216;take it with you&#8217;?  Are you kidding?   So tell me, if I customize (rather, configure) my salesforce.com account, if I leave SFDC, how do you propose I &#8216;take it with me?&#8217;</p>
<p>Sure&#8230;documenting customizations and configuration for future reference is fine, but how is that related to negotiating SaaS contracts?</p>
<p>your colorful brain picture is very pretty, but &#8216;tip 1&#8242; is a whole other area of project mgmt and nothing to do with tips 2-5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot Ross</title>
		<link>http://leapcomp.com/2009/02/tips-for-saas-solution-negotiations-and-knowledge-transfer.html#comment-4252</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leapcomp.com/?p=813#comment-4252</guid>
		<description>Julien, How true, and I could not agree more.

Even with 'in house' software - organizations tend to neglect documenting their cusomizations.

No matter how minor they appear they should be documented.

Because at some time in the future someone will be wondering why that change was made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julien, How true, and I could not agree more.</p>
<p>Even with &#8216;in house&#8217; software - organizations tend to neglect documenting their cusomizations.</p>
<p>No matter how minor they appear they should be documented.</p>
<p>Because at some time in the future someone will be wondering why that change was made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

