Vue Software

Monthly Archive for August, 2009

Casual Conversations about the Importance of Pay for Performance

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 4.5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

I overheard a conversation today about employee pay, with the premise being, what should come first, performance or pay?

One of the gentlemen in conversation is a small business owner with about 35 employees. He was quick to answer his own question – “of course, performance should come first, but my (employees) don’t get this.”

I bit my tongue and stayed out of the conversation. But this seemingly shallow exchange got me thinking that indeed, someone could dispute this notion depending on how they view base salary and variable pay.

In the case of base salary, pay comes before performance. Sure, the employee receives a paycheck only after having performed the work. But the level of base salary is contingent on the skill this employee brings to the table. So in this sense, pay comes first. Over time the employee demonstrates a level of proficiency that either confirms or questions management’s initial expectations. Come the focal review, management may decide to place another bet by giving a merit increase to the employee. But there’s no guarantee that the employee will perform in line with management’s now higher expectations.

With variable pay, performance comes first – whether it’s the company’s performance or the employee’s against a set of objectives. Management can provide an advance or draw, but if the employee does not cover the draw, the pay becomes surrogate for base salary.

If the employee expects, or feels entitled to, a bonus, this is a problem. Similarly, there’s a problem if the employee feels entitled to a merit increase, or even continuance of his/her current base-salary rate when failing to meet management’s initial expectations of proficiency. Neither side wins in this scenario. Management feels put off that the employee doesn’t appreciate his/her compensation and the employee is disengaged, bitter, and possibly starting to think about getting another job.

Maybe I should have intervened. Then perhaps the small business owner could answer his employees’ question, and also appease them, by saying, “yes, you are right – pay does come first in the form of your base salary.” He can then rather seamlessly and without guilt or conflict, revisit the performance expectations inherent in the variable pay program.

Contact Scott Barton at scottbarton22@gmail.com

Tags: , ,

Related Posts:
How and Why Symantec overhauled their legacy recognition program
Salespeople Struggle With Bonus Targets In Downturn… And Technology Hurdles

Incentive Compensation Screw Up at Hewlett Packard

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (11 votes, average: 4.09 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

An Article in the Wall Street Journal talks about the recent challenges HP is having with their in-house incentive compensation system.

HP’s compensation system, named Omega, is having problems calculating accurate commissions for 2000 out of the 23,000 HP salesreps according to current and former H-P employees and recent company emails reviewed by The Wall Street Journal. The problem persists since November, and some salespeople have waited as long as seven months to get their correct commissions. To mitigate this problem, HP is giving some salespeople monthly payments equal to 60% or 70% of what they would earn for meeting sales quotas.

According to the article, one of the major reasons for these problems is that the solution did not scale up very well to HP’s growth.

Problems similar to this are frequent in the world of enterprise software. Many large companies decide to build their own software thinking that they will save money in the long run. This is often a short sighted view which does not consider the cost of fixing those systems, keeping them in production, keeping them up to date with the new technologies, etc (what is often called the total cost of ownership). Also, usually, homegrown systems are built for a specific purpose, not offering enough flexibility to easily handle emerging needs. As we can see with HP, this can even be a problem for companies in the software and computer hardware business.

In my opinion, an in-house solution can only be justified when there are no commercially available solution that can meet the business requirements; and if it looks like the business requirements are too complex to be handled by such a solution, it might be a good time to reassess those requirements and processes.

Ten or more years ago when the HP incentive compensation system was created, there were virtually no commercial SPM applications available. Times have changed, and with dozens of viable options, now might be a good time for HP to consider an investment that will benefit them in the long term instead of sinking money in a system that is not working properly. They might even find out that the products on the market today offer many features that could help take their sales performance to the next level.



Related Posts:
Merced Systems
Incentive System Implementation Success Story

Ventana Research Sales Performance Management Value Index

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (4 votes, average: 3.75 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Ventana Research recently released their Sales Performance Management Value Index 2009 research paper which benchmarks four leading SPM solution suppliers and their solutions.

Unlike the Gartner SPM report which I have discussed a few times, the Ventana Value Index evaluates how well vendors’ offerings meet buyers’ requirements for software that enables and supports Sales Performance Management. The Index evaluates the software in the context of seven key categories: adaptability, manageability, reliability, usability, functionality, total cost of ownership, and return on investment.

You can jump on their website to download the executive summary after a quick registration.

The research notes that there are 5 vendors providing solutions across the sales performance management spectrum: Callidus Software, Merced Systems, Synygy, Varicent Software and Xactly Corporation. The other solution providers were out of the scope because their offerings are too broad (focus on CRM and Sales Force Automation) or too specific (focus on only a certain area of SPM or on a specific industry).

As expected, after compiling the weighted scores for each category, the value index difference is within 1% for the top 3 vendors (Callidus, Varicent and Merced), with Xactly lagging only a few percents behind. Most categories yielded very close results, with the largest (but still small) gaps in the capability and validation categories.

These results are not extremely surprising since the research focused on how well the SPM offerings met the buyers’ requirements, and since most SPM solutions offer very similar core functionality. However, this doesn’t mean that there are no significant differences in how, or how well the solutions handle various SPM requirements.

As for Synygy, some things could be inferred from a company concerned to be benchmarked against competitors by an independent research firm.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Align, Optimize and Understand
Callidus Software Launches Executive Briefing Series, “Survive and Thrive: Secrets to Selling More

Versata 2009 Customer Forum

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
August 19, 2009toAugust 22, 2009

Venue: Austin, Texas
Focus: Versata Solutions

This year’s customer forum will be our largest, most compelling user group to date - with over 100 registered participants from around the world representing 15 different industries. The meetings will take place in Portland, Oregon at the Downtown Waterfront Marriott, situated on the Willamette River. All current Versata and Artemis customers are invited to the three day conference.

Click here for more information and to register
.

Local user events also taking place during the month in Austin, Texas, and in Savannah, Georgia .

Tags: , ,

Related Posts:
Accord/Loma Insurance Systems Forum
New web forum for the EIM Community - Get your Answers Now!