<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Team Performance Poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leapcomp.com/2009/10/team-performance-poll.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leapcomp.com/2009/10/team-performance-poll.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 17:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Doran</title>
		<link>http://leapcomp.com/2009/10/team-performance-poll.html#comment-21444</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Doran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leapcomp.com/?p=1050#comment-21444</guid>
		<description>I wonder if it would be possible to derive a system whereby for transactions associated with teams, the team voted to determine who got what split.  Selfishness would need to be guarded against, but with the right management climate, and good hiring practices, I wonder if it wouldn't result in a fair distribution.  Even more importantly, it may result in a distribution everyone *thought* was fair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if it would be possible to derive a system whereby for transactions associated with teams, the team voted to determine who got what split.  Selfishness would need to be guarded against, but with the right management climate, and good hiring practices, I wonder if it wouldn&#8217;t result in a fair distribution.  Even more importantly, it may result in a distribution everyone *thought* was fair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

