Vue Software

Archive for the 'Research and Articles' Category

Ventana Research Sales Performance Management Value Index

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (4 votes, average: 3.75 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Ventana Research recently released their Sales Performance Management Value Index 2009 research paper which benchmarks four leading SPM solution suppliers and their solutions.

Unlike the Gartner SPM report which I have discussed a few times, the Ventana Value Index evaluates how well vendors’ offerings meet buyers’ requirements for software that enables and supports Sales Performance Management. The Index evaluates the software in the context of seven key categories: adaptability, manageability, reliability, usability, functionality, total cost of ownership, and return on investment.

You can jump on their website to download the executive summary after a quick registration.

The research notes that there are 5 vendors providing solutions across the sales performance management spectrum: Callidus Software, Merced Systems, Synygy, Varicent Software and Xactly Corporation. The other solution providers were out of the scope because their offerings are too broad (focus on CRM and Sales Force Automation) or too specific (focus on only a certain area of SPM or on a specific industry).

As expected, after compiling the weighted scores for each category, the value index difference is within 1% for the top 3 vendors (Callidus, Varicent and Merced), with Xactly lagging only a few percents behind. Most categories yielded very close results, with the largest (but still small) gaps in the capability and validation categories.

These results are not extremely surprising since the research focused on how well the SPM offerings met the buyers’ requirements, and since most SPM solutions offer very similar core functionality. However, this doesn’t mean that there are no significant differences in how, or how well the solutions handle various SPM requirements.

As for Synygy, some things could be inferred from a company concerned to be benchmarked against competitors by an independent research firm.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Align, Optimize and Understand
Callidus Software Launches Executive Briefing Series, “Survive and Thrive: Secrets to Selling More

Quality versus Quantity: Aligning Sales Incentives with Profitability (Part 3)

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Data Rules

Clear, timely reporting remains the greatest hurdle to using profitability in the sales incentive plan. For the measure to be effective, sales people and managers must understand what drivers of profitability need focus with a degree of frequency that aligns with the sales cycle. Most challenging are sales environments with a high-transaction frequency, significant disparity in profitability across those transactions, and use of channel partners in the sale and distribution of the product.

There are a number of software applications for financial reporting and analytics; check for those prominent in your industry, and ensure targeted vendors have met the requirements of companies similar to yours. From a sales perspective, the best applications are those delivering only the needed information at a given time. The last thing you want your sales people doing is poring over lengthy reports, instead of selling.

Many times when auditing metrics and goal effectiveness we discover management and sales people simply don’t use the data, either because they think its not accurate or it doesn’t pertain to current priorities. Data accuracy has a number of root causes. For purposes of sales motivation and incentives, your quality metric is dead on arrival if there is widespread perception or poor data quality. Therefore, test the metric’s reporting accuracy thoroughly before applying to incentives. A good rule of thumb is the number of items requiring correction should not exceed one percent of the total data set – e.g., no more than 1 of every 100 goal-achievement scores in that month’s performance period requires adjustment due to erroneous data.

To help ensure sales management and reps actually use the reports (once accurate), include sales management in the process for defining reporting requirements, configuring the reporting interface, and other user-centric components. Once you are reporting the metric to the field, research and showcase best-in-class usage, using day-in-the-life examples and statistics on time savings. Appoint sales managers as technology champions to fully understand the application’s benefits, and espouse these benefits to the larger sales population. Monitor usage, and have in place close-loop process to address unintended consequences.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Sales Incentives and Profitability Key Points
Quality versus Quantity: Aligning Sales Incentives with Profitability (Part 4)

Quality versus Quantity: Aligning Sales Incentives with Profitability (Part 2)

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Even if market practice for a job suggests metrics that are exclusively growth oriented (e.g., revenue), many industries and jobs are or will have to shift the focus away from growth and toward profitability because of the economy. So with a look-forward perspective, you need to address: how does each job influence profitability? In general, influencers or drivers of profitability for sales roles fall into one of the following four categories:

  • Revenue through product preference or price protection
  • Cost containment
  • Risk mitigation
  • Strategic influences; e.g., business growth, customer service, cross sell, efficiency (e.g., utilization of CIS)

Revenue drivers apply when sellers have autonomy over pricing or product positioning. To motivate performance in this area, management can include gross margin or product-specific quotas into the plan, keeping in mind that in transactional selling environments, sellers can increase today’s margins at the expense of longer terms growth. One way to achieve a balance between short- and longer-term measures in the incentive plan is to link the product or gross margin goal attainment score with that of overall revenue (through a matrix, for example).

Cost containment is not typically a function of transactional sellers, though selling supervisors and relationship managers of large, complex accounts might have impact over the use of company resources (e.g., support personnel), T&E, freight and other deal-specific variables that count as expense. Stay clear of operating or allocated costs over which the job has no influence. Inclusion of such “fixed” costs adds complexity to the incentive scheme.

Risk mitigation includes adjustments for factors that could influence longer-term profitability. Examples include customer viability, third-party partner involvement and cost of capital. More risky industries typically use risk departments to assess the degree of risk inherent in each deal, thus freeing the sales function to focus on bringing deals to the table (a balance of power, so to speak). While sales people are often in a unique position to assess certain risk factors, their inherent motivation is to find ways to make the deal happen, not prevent it. The wiser choice is to use other mechanisms, including senior leadership review, to mitigate risk.

Strategic drivers include indirect factors that contribute to efficiency, customer loyalty, price protection and other, likely contributors to profitability. Measures such as cross sell, customer penetration (percent of wallet) and customer satisfaction fall into this category. Remember these are indirect factors. More efficient sales people aren’t necessarily more productive; happy customers aren’t necessarily loyal customers, especially those with low price elasticity.

Some industries, such as retail, use customer satisfaction as a key competitive differentiator. In such industries, motivating employees to delight customers is mission critical. It’s not upside, not bonus. These are table stakes, and in the total rewards framework, compensated through base salary. Those employees going above and beyond should receive special recognition.

Putting pay at risk, through the incentive plan, for strategic items is probably not effective unless there are meaningful dollars at stake (>20% of base salary). Otherwise, sales people dismiss these goals as not important, and focus on what will make a difference to their pay. Getting sales people to focus on drivers of efficiency, penetration and customer loyalty requires drum banging from all levels of the organization, from the CEO down to the line supervisor. Everyone, leadership especially, must walk the talk. Only when you have such continuity and unwavering organizational commitment can you expect the sales force to focus and make progress here.

Strategic drivers can be more difficult to track and report. Cross-selling is often self-reported, customer satisfaction a subjective and cost-intensive exercise. Employees have to believe the data and be able to see the connection between their actions and the company’s objectives. Otherwise, they’re not motivated (at best) or, if there’s pay at risk, upset.

As the figure below suggests, you are more likely to get results by introducing measures over which the sales people believe they have meaningful light of sight. Your best chance at increasing sales person focus on drivers of profitability is to emphasize through goals and incentive opportunity factors they currently, or perceive they can, influence.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Sales Incentives and Profitability Key Points
Quality versus Quantity: Aligning Sales Incentives with Profitability (Part 3)

Perspective on the Philosphy of Incentives and Can They Really Help you Achieve your Objectives

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (3 votes, average: 3.33 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Immanuel Kant, an 18th century German philosopher, developed an interesting theory. His theory is based on the premise that a single moral obligation must be obeyed in all situations if our behavior is to observe the moral law. He also believed that if an action is not done with the motive of duty, then it is without moral value.

Here is an interesting article with an example of Kant’s theory:

Suppose that I, a rich Westerner, ought to make a contribution to charity to relieve poverty in the developing world, and that I am well aware of this fact. Suppose further that I would like to do so, that I care about the welfare of others and so that making such a donation will make me happy. When I make the donation, it is difficult to tell whether I am doing so out of duty (because I recognise that I ought to) or out of inclination (because I want to).

Kant holds that moral action must result from respect for the moral law. If I give money to charity because I want to, but I lack respect for the moral law and so if I didn’t want to make a donation then I wouldn’t, then in making the donation I am not acting well. My donation is at best benign, and at worst selfish; it is certainly not laudable.

If, on the other, I don’t want to give money to charity, but, because of my strong sense of duty, do so anyway, then this Kant would applaud. I may be mean, selfish, and heartless, but I respect the moral law. In conquering my inclination I have acted well.

Now, the question becomes how do you instill sense of duty? Where does it come from?  In the context of incentive compensation, even more interesting - can incentives help create/instill that sense of duty?

According to this article, that’s a pretty hopeless endeavor.

McLean Parks and Hesford conducted a study using a random sample of students who were paid for solving anagrams according to one of three different compensation plans. The plans consisted of different forms of compensation, but their expected value was identical. The students self-scored their work and in half of the cases signed a statement attesting to the veracity of their reported results.

The study resulted in very interesting findings:

  • Participants receiving a ‘flat salary’ for their work were the most honest about reporting their scores.
  • Many participants who received a performance based bonus cheated when reporting their results.
  • Participants who were penalized based on low performance not only cheated but also stole the nice pens that were to be returned at the end of the study!

So we should ask ourselves Kant’s ideas are still relevant today, and sadly, if moral obligation is an outdated concept. Also, it doesn’t look like Parks and Hesford’s study actually measured performance of each of the compensation plans, but it is clear that penalizing employees is not a good idea, and that controls should be in place to ensure the employees have no way of “gaming” the system.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Can Performance be Measured?
Performance Measurement and Incentives

Percent of Revenue Spent on Sales Incentives?

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

I recently wrote about a Callidus press release claiming that Telcos in EMEA typically spent 10% of their revenue on incentive compensation.  My first reaction was to think that this number was very high.  But with my job, I rarely see a company’s overall compensation budget…

Today Makana Solutions released a piece of their compensation survey.  Keep in mind that this survey was for small businesses, but the majority of respondents spend 5-10% of their revenues on sales incentives.  It sounds like the Callidus “10%” could be accurate :-)

Source: http://www.makanasolutions.com/Blog/bid/8497/What-is-the-right-percent-of-revenue-to-allocate-for-sales-incentives

Tags: , , ,

Related Posts:
How Healthy is the Incentive Compensation Industry?
ICM News This Week

Sales Compensation Survey Time!

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 1 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

I find it’s a good idea to participate in surveys because it’s often the only way to get a full copy of the results and not only an executive summary.  Sure, you usually have to share some contact information, but you’ll rarely get more than a follow up call from the vendor / system integrator / management consulting company…  That’s a small price to pay for all the valuable information you will gain from dozens of companies!  And don’t we all want to know how we compare to the market!

Makana just released a short survey for small business owners and sales managers.  If you are curious about what others are doing to cope with the recession, or if you’d like to find out how much other small business usually pay in sales compensation as a percentage of revenues, you should participate.   The deadline is coming soon - this Friday, February 13th, 2009!

OpenSymmetry is also going to release a sales compensation survey very shortly and I will provide a link as soon as it’s up.  If you want to gain further insight into your own organization’s compensation practices and make valuable comparisons between your company’s compensation practices & market norms, keep an eye on this blog for the link, or send me an e-mail and I’ll send you the survey invitation directly.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Sales Comp Administration Practices Survey
Survey on Sales Quota