Vue Software

Archive for the 'Uncategorized' Category

7 Principles to Improved Sales Performance

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 4.5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

In designing an incentive compensation scheme there is no one perfect design, there are however some common best practice design principles that characterize effective schemes.

Effectively implementing these seven principles will provide immediate value to the sales organization therefore we would recommend that you consider how your organization compares.

1. Clear link to strategy
Plans need to link clearly to company goals, hold participants accountable for the results they control, and pay for results focusing on margin or profit rather than volume.

2. Accurate, Transparent and Consistent
Performance should be accurately measured and a transparent and there should be a consistent link between performance and plan payout. Where possible, this process is automated to ensure effectiveness.

3. Uninterrupted flow of key strategic messages
There is an effective flow of key messages (for example growth, increasing profitability per customer, quality customer retention) from the sales strategy to sales targets to salesperson role to incentive plan measures to payout.

4. Significant on-target opportunity
Plans have an on-target payout which is significant and consistent with company/product status in the market. For example, a new product/service in a new market requires a more highly leveraged plan.

5. Promotes positive behaviors
The plan should influence sales behavior in a way that drives positive selling and which prevents negative selling behaviors.

6. Simple
A plan should be simple, using as few performance measures as possible. If the salesperson can’t explain how it works in under a minute, it’s too complex.

7. Differentiation
Plan payout should differentiate clearly between excellent and average sales performance.

This post was written by Jon Clark at Sean Culligan at OpenSymmetry’s UK office.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Xactly Incent 4.0 - Effective Dating and Other New Features
Best Practices for Sales Compensation Management

Merced ICM… Two Years Later

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (8 votes, average: 3.5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

I’m back from my blogging “vacation” and I apologize to all my readers for this long delay. I’ve been extremely busy juggling projects and I started an MBA a few months ago which has been using most of my free time. I will do my best to do a better job at fitting blogging in my schedule.

For this first new post, I’d like to talk about Merced Systems. I covered Merced’s incentive solution (then called Merced Incentive Management or MIM) about two years ago, soon after it acquired Practique Associates. At that time, the big question was, is Merced going to be successful at integrating the incentive compensation tool to the rest of its products, and will it be able to compete against well established vendors such as Callidus and Varicent in the competitive US market.  Gaining credibility from clients, selling enterprise solutions and going live with them is a long cycle, and finally, after two years, some conclusion can be drawn.

The Company…
First, I’d like to talk about the company itself. Even with the recession, Merced Systems has managed to grow and post profits for 7 consecutive years. I’m pointing this out because in a world where most other SPM companies are relying on investments to develop solutions and gain market share, Merced has actually been making money – and reinvesting it into R&D to improve their product.  It now counts over 225 employees concentrated in its Silicon Valley and London offices, responsible for more than 125 customers deployed in over 20 countries. Merced’s big challenge at the moment is to hire enough smart people to sustain its rapid growth.

The Challenges…
One of the first challenges Merced needed to overcome to be successful in the US market was to develop the ability to implement and support its ICM solution in the United States as well. Now with over two years of ICM experience under its belt, this is no longer a concern.

The other hurdle that Merced needed to overcome was to attract large clients in the United States to show that it could be successful here as well. One of its first projects in the US was Nationwide. The goal was to help agents gain more visibility into their performance, to increase payment accuracy and to reduce calculation time. Merced ICM successfully managed to accomplish these goals, and the phase one of the project was completed in early 2010. Many customers in the United States are finally live or are currently being implemented; these customers include Bank of America, Otsuka and Dell. When I spoke with Mark Selcow, Merced System’s president, he pointed out that not only was Merced successful at gaining traction in the US market, but that it was also keeping its momentum in the European market. Merced recently announced the successful deployment of the ICM Suite at Kia Motors.

The Solution…
Now about the solution itself; as a reminder, in a nutshell, Merced ICM calculates compensation and incentives, and provides meaningful reports and dashboards. Since Merced acquired Practique, Selcow noted that Merced System’s engineers have been working very hard at integrating the incentive solution to the other tools of the Merced Suite comprising Merced Planning (for territory planning, quota planning and goal setting), Merced Intelligence (for sales and compensation analytics) and to the Merced Performance Suite (used for performance scorecards, ranking, and coaching). Selcow believes that scorecarding for seller self-correction and coaching to drive best sales behaviors are emerging trends in Sales Performance Management, and will become an important part of ICM/SPM solutions.

In my opinion, one of the biggest improvements recently brought to the incentive compensation suite is the Workflow Manager module. Workflow Manager allows users to setup various workflow that can range from dispute resolution and payment approval, to requiring approval to submit a manual adjustment, MBOs, or to make any changes to a plan component.

Two years ago I also showed screenshots of some standard reports and dashboards available with this solution. I had a hard time choosing a good adjective to describe them, but the first word that came to mind was “outdated”. Again, thanks to Merced’s competent engineering team, Merced ICM received a face lift with the Merced Analytics suite. Leveraging MicroStrategy Business Intelligence, Merced ICM delivers stunning reports and dashboards.

Significant improvements were also brought to the functionality and features of the application. Some of Merced’s innovations are based on their aggressive roadmap to become the number one sales solution provider (with Merced ICM being a significant part of that objective). However, Selcow also noted that Merced is a very agile company and that many innovations are a result of customer requests.

In Conclusion…
Another aspect that makes Merced different from its competitors is the ability for a client to choose to deploy it on-premise or on-demand and to have the ability to easily switch from one to the other if needs evolve.  With Callidus trying to be a completely recurring revenue business, or Varicent which is mostly on-premise, having the ability to choose between both delivery models can be a huge advantage.

But according to Mark Selcow, even with great technical solutions, what REALLY makes Merced Systems and Merced ICM different from the competition is its relentless focus on its customer’s success during and after an implementation. “We don’t see ourselves as a solution provider” he told me, “we become a true partner”.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Merced Incentive Management
Merced Systems

SaaS – Future or Buzz?

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (7 votes, average: 4.29 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

I had a good conversation with Chris Cabrera, the CEO of Xactly Corporation, last week. We spent an hour talking about Software as a Service (SaaS) and why people should care. He is definitely one of the people most passionate about this topic that I know!

For those who don’t remember, I wrote an article called “Buy the Car, Rent the Car or Take the Bus” which explains the difference between on-premise, single-tenancy and multi-tenancy.

“Many people are confused about what SaaS is, and about the benefits of a pure SaaS solution” said Cabrera. “Many companies use the term incorrectly to be buzzword compliant. That’s too bad because some people start to believe it is only a marketing gimmick.” I asked him why people should actually care about if a solution is SaaS or not. Playing the devil’s advocate, it would seem like most potential customers would not care if a solution is really a SaaS solution versus hosted, or multi-tenancy versus single-tenancy.

Chris mentioned 6 reasons why potential customers should care:

  1. It is in the client’s interest for the vendor – their technology partner – to be around long term. On-premise solutions are not cost effective because they have so many technology stacks and versions of the software that need to be maintained and supported. With SaaS solutions, some of the savings are passed back to the client, and a significant portion of the revenues are reinvested into the infrastructure as well as in the development of new features.
  2. SaaS vendors can focus on improving a single software version, used by every customer. Every engineer is dedicated to improving a single source of code. This allows the vendor to release new features and improvements much more quickly than is typically feasible with an on-premise solution.
  3. Upgrading a SaaS solution usually happens ‘behind the scenes’. New SaaS software releases are tested extremely rigorously before being released. A quality problem would impact thousands of customers and hundreds of thousands of payees. On-premise solutions often transfer the quality ownership to the clients who must perform their own regression testing after an often labor intensive upgrade process.
  4. Non-SaaS solutions are not always scalable. For example, with 10, 100 or even 1000 customers, an on-premise solution might work. But the real test will be when a solution is used by thousands of customers – will a non-SaaS solution really be able to scale up? “Probably not” said Cabrera.
  5. SaaS vendors constantly measure and monitor their environment. They make a significant investment into that infrastructure to ensure an optimal performance for all of their customers.
  6. SaaS solutions are usually sold on a basis of $ per payee per month. Solutions such as Xactly Incent all of a sudden become cost effective for even small companies which can avoid a high upfront infrastructure and license cost.

Chris Cabrera is convinced of one thing: SaaS is the future. “On-premise solutions might still be appropriate for a very small share of the market, but SaaS is appropriate at least 98% of the time.” Looking at the market trends, I would say he’s right. Most vendors realized the benefits of SaaS and are rushing in that direction.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility
Tips for SaaS Contract Negotiations, and Knowledge Transfer

ActekSoft ACom3 Review Part 2

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (6 votes, average: 3.17 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

In this second part of the ActekSoft ACom3 Sales Performance Management solution review, I will focus on some of the concepts that make this solution a particularly good fit for insurance clients. The first part of this article is here.

Management of producer (payee) data
The insurance industry has very challenging requirements regarding producer (payee) data. ACom3 supports an unlimited number of direct and indirect hierarchies with no limits on the number of levels it contains (some of ActekSoft’s clients pay more than 20 levels). ACom3 also has an integrated license and compliance module which can easily manage logic for compliance violations.

Communication / Workflow
ACom3’s correspondence module can be setup to automatically send letters or emails on demand or based on conditions configured the system (for example in can send an e-mail when a license will expire in a certain number of days, or when a debit balance exceeds a certain dollar amount). The workflow module can be leveraged to facilitate and streamline internal and external communications.

Unearned Commissions
ACom3 provides built-in features to facilitate logic to handle unearned/future commissions such as annualized payout and advanced payment with automated charge backs for policy terminations that take place while there is still an unearned commission balance on the advance. ACom3 also has a reserve feature which holds back a portion of the advance payment to offset future chargebacks.

Scalability
Unlike many other industries, the insurance industry always requires computation at the transactional level and not at a summary level. Because of the volume of transactions and often complex hierarchies which can transform an originating transaction into an additional 10 or 20 transactions, efficient scalability is critical. ACom3 uses the concept of work units which can distribute processing across multiple servers and processors.

Insurance specific concepts in Formulas
Compensation formulas contain many insurance specific concepts such policy age and policy age/holder age calculations, a wide range of performance based tiering options, and the ability to tie advances and automated charge backs to calculations.

Strong Retroactive Capabilities
Retroactive processing is particularly important to the insurance industry and ACom3 supports in excess of 20 retroactive objects that allow the system to reverse and reprocess transactions for as many periods back required. Retroactivity is often required to resolve incorrect assignment of producers to a customer or policy, incorrect hierarchies, the use of an incorrect schedule, etc. ACom3 marks all transactions that need to be reprocessed in prior and current periods to ensure that tiered based payments are correct.

Security and Audits
Data confidentiality and security is highly regulated in the insurance industry. ACom3 was built with these requirements in mind and offers strong security and audit functionality, audit reporting, secure data transfers, and encryption out of the box.

Final Thoughts
Overall, I was impressed by the richness of ACom3. The size of the company could have been a concern for potential clients, but with Callidus now standing behind ActekSoft, this should no longer be a concern. The new challenge which ActekSoft will have to manage is to retain the same level of client-focus they have demonstrated in the past for their current and new customers.

While I found that ACom3 is not the ‘sexiest’ application, several improvements were recently made to its user interface with its release version 6.0. ACom3 provides several insurance specific features, and its focus on transactional processing makes it a solution worth considering for many projects.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Callidus Software Acquires ActekSoft
ActekSoft ACom3 Review

ActekSoft ACom3 Review

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (6 votes, average: 3 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

ActekSoft was founded in 1999 and currently supports over 30 clients (mostly in the insurance industry).  I talked about them earlier this year when they got acquired by Callidus Software. Acteksoft’s flagship product is called ACom3 and can be deployed On-Premise or On-Demand.  Approximately one third of ActekSoft’s clients are currently hosted.

As I’ve discussed in a previous post, Gartner recently released their 2009 ICM MarketScope for the insurance industry. Gartner cites the following as some of the main reasons why ActekSoft deserved a positive rating:

ActekSoft was rated Positive this year, due primarily to its deep understanding and ability to deliver health insurance requirements, the number of new deals in the past 12 months and the positive nature of its customer references. Four of its customers were interviewed for this report… Several themes resonated throughout these interviews. First, ActekSoft is very committed to the pricing that is quoted to the customer… Second, customers cite a culture of customer satisfaction and commitment to project delivery.

ACom3 is accessible via a web browser. After logging into the application, administrators find themselves into a relatively intuitive interface; the various application areas are accessed via the top menu, and configuration for each of those areas are accessible in the left menu. Different sections can also be expanded and collapsed by clicking on the + or - icons. The content of each of these sections is completely configurable by simply dragging and dropping fields into the appropriate section. Sections can also easily be added as required.

A plan consists of ‘schedules’ which are applicable to a certain region and hierarchy. These schedules are rule driven and reference formulas, filters, tables, etc. Reference data is typically imported into the application, but editing information such as transaction details or producer information can be performed manually by inserting text into text boxes, or by selecting values from drop down menus.

The look and feel of the interface for payees is very similar to the administrator’s interface. Upon logging in the application, the payees can access performance details for themselves and for their subordinates via reports and dashboards. They can also access important information such as their appointments, their book of business, etc.

All of these features are very similar to what is expected from any sales performance management solution, so you may wonder what makes ACom3 different than other non-insurance specific solutions. I will discuss some of these differentiators in my next post.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Callidus Software Acquires ActekSoft
ActekSoft ACom3 Review Part 2

Quota Performance Distribution

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (3 votes, average: 3.67 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Last week I wrote that the percentage of reps making quota in 2009 dropped to 51.8% from 58.8% in 2008, according to a large survey. One of my readers made the comment that it would be interesting to find out how many companies expect/want their sales people to make quota.

I reached out to two experts in the incentive compensation field to get their opinion.

Donya Rose from the Cygnal Group replied on her blog that ‘most people should achieve or exceed quota’. More specifically, she says, more than half of the people should hit or exceed their goal.   She notes that the ideal performance distribution should be as follows:

  • Not more than 5% of the sales people “out of the money” (earning no variable pay), and the these people should generally not be “keepers”
  • About 40% of the sales people earning some variable pay, but less than the target amount
  • About 45% of the sales people earning more than the target amount, but less than the fully leveraged upside (fully leveraged upside is generally 2 to 3 times the target incentive)
  • About 10% of the sales people earning the fully leveraged upside or more.

So the 51.8% of people making quota in 2008 is low, but still acceptable according to Donya’s point of view.

I also asked the question to David Cichelli from the Alexander Group. His answer was that companies should shoot for 65 to 70 percent of all sales people to achieve quota. He notes that this performance distribution should create an on-goal performance of at least 100% of company sales goal. Through their own survey, the Alexander Group also noticed a significant reduction in quota attainment in 2009, with a median quota performance of 85%… a historically low number.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Setting Sales Quotas
A small sovereign city-state located in South Western Europe on the northern central coast of the Mediterranean Sea