Incentive Compensation and Sales Performance Management Survey

Archive for the 'Vendor / SPM Solution Review and Info' Category

Ventana Research Sales Performance Management Value Index

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (4 votes, average: 3.75 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Ventana Research recently released their Sales Performance Management Value Index 2009 research paper which benchmarks four leading SPM solution suppliers and their solutions.

Unlike the Gartner SPM report which I have discussed a few times, the Ventana Value Index evaluates how well vendors’ offerings meet buyers’ requirements for software that enables and supports Sales Performance Management. The Index evaluates the software in the context of seven key categories: adaptability, manageability, reliability, usability, functionality, total cost of ownership, and return on investment.

You can jump on their website to download the executive summary after a quick registration.

The research notes that there are 5 vendors providing solutions across the sales performance management spectrum: Callidus Software, Merced Systems, Synygy, Varicent Software and Xactly Corporation. The other solution providers were out of the scope because their offerings are too broad (focus on CRM and Sales Force Automation) or too specific (focus on only a certain area of SPM or on a specific industry).

As expected, after compiling the weighted scores for each category, the value index difference is within 1% for the top 3 vendors (Callidus, Varicent and Merced), with Xactly lagging only a few percents behind. Most categories yielded very close results, with the largest (but still small) gaps in the capability and validation categories.

These results are not extremely surprising since the research focused on how well the SPM offerings met the buyers’ requirements, and since most SPM solutions offer very similar core functionality. However, this doesn’t mean that there are no significant differences in how, or how well the solutions handle various SPM requirements.

As for Synygy, some things could be inferred from a company concerned to be benchmarked against competitors by an independent research firm.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Align, Optimize and Understand
Callidus Software Launches Executive Briefing Series, “Survive and Thrive: Secrets to Selling More

Varicent SPM 6.0 and Presenter Review

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (8 votes, average: 3.13 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Varicent announced a new major release of their application – Varicent SPM 6.0 – at their user conference on Monday. The new features of this release include a new module called Presenter (a tool to build interactive sales reports), Model Manager (a tool to facilitate the management of multiple compensation models / lines of business), and CRM Integration (providing the ability to embed Varicent SPM into Microsoft Dynamics CRM). I spent the past 3 days training on this new release of Varicent SPM, and in particular on the Presenter module which I will review now.

Presenter allows to create and configure custom reports, and to publish them to the web. In the past, Varicent users had to use the “Web Forms” module to create similar reports, but web forms are more complex to build, and lack key features such as the ability to embed graphs. This new module is supposed to empower business users to design their own reports, directly from within the Varicent SPM application.

Reports consist of 4 key components storing data:
- Calculations
- Parameters (restrictions on the results being displayed)
- Scalars (variable returning single value)
- Sources (where the information is coming from)

As well as other building blocks: Images, Text, Controls, Scalars, Fixed Grid, Data Grids and Charts. Creating a report only consists of adding these elements to the empty report page.

The positioning of the objects on the report is fairly straightforward and consists of creating tables and inserting the objects in their own cell. In order to position everything perfectly, tables can be embedded into each other (a new table created within the cell of another table), etc. The positioning of the objects can be fine tuned by adjusting the cell’s alignment settings, borders and cell spacing. In other words, positioning objects in Presenter’s reports feels exactly like designing a web page a few years ago before CSS became a standard.

Presenter also includes many other formatting features which should be familiar from Excel. For example, borders and cell shading can be adjusted in a very similar way, and it is even easy to setup some conditional formatting (such as a cell being highlighted in yellow if a commission is over a certain amount). Reports can also include links to other reports which allows to “drill down” on specific results. Presenter reports can be made very “dynamic” by including dropdown menus (called pick lists by Varicent) to filter results for certain people, product lines, etc.

Once the objects are inserted into the report, clicking on the “Preview” tab shows how the report would look like on the web once it is published, using actual calculation results.

So can “business users” really create their own reports? Presenter seems to be much easier to use than other BI/reporting applications such as Actuate and Business Objects and does not require any reporting experience. Furthermore, simple reports can be created fairly rapidly. This being said, the ‘complexity’ lies in figuring out which sources or calculations need to be used, and also to be able to create these objects when required. For someone with Varicent implementation experience, the learning curve should be very quick.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Varicent
Varicent Insight 2009

CellarStone Releases New SPM solution: EasyCommission

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (16 votes, average: 2.19 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

EasyCommission is a new on-demand application for small companies.  The press release claims that it is very flexible and easy to use.

But as we discussed before, flexibility often comes at the expense of complexity.  In this first release of the application, many features were kept out, presumable to make the application easier to use.  For example, it does not support quota based commissions, draws/caps, and splits between more than 2 payees.  It also does not provide any e-mail capability.

Maybe we’ll have a review coming up… But for now, if you are curious to see what the application looks like, there are plenty of screen captures here.

What I find very interesting about EasyCommission is the pricing model; I haven’t seen this in any other SaaS solution.

There is a free edition that sets a limit of 1 administrator and 4 reps.  This free version limits “advanced functionality” and there is no support.  The economy edition has a limit of 19 reps.  Again, functionality is limited and support is on a “per incident basis”.  Finally, the regular version unlocks all the features, and full support is included.  What I find very interesting, is that with the free and economy editions, users will be shown advertising within the application.

CellarStone also offers a more robust solution called QCommission which can support up to 10,000 payees according to their website.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Sales Performance Management Solutions for ‘Very Small’ Sales Forces
It’s Varicent’s Turn to Report Record Revenues for 2007

Excentive Incentive Management Review

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (15 votes, average: 3.73 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Here is my latest Incentive Compensation Management application review. This week I am reviewing a relatively unknown (in North America) solution called Excentive Incentive Management.  Excentive was incorporated in 2002. Since then, they have gained a lot of popularity in France and have signed major clients such as Canon, Orange, and Air France. Earlier this year, they raised 700,000 Euros ($880,000 US) to accelerate international growth, part of over $1 million raised in recent months to fuel global expansion.

They also assembled an additional team driven by 10 seasoned managers active in the globalization of companies such as SAP, Hyperion, and OutlookSoft. One of their key target markets is of course North America, so we may soon start seeing some Excentive implementations over here if they can overcome some major challenges ahead, namely convincing prospective clients that they have the capability to deliver and support their implementations in the US, and that they are financially stable.

What is particularly interesting about the Excentive solution is that it includes performance management modules in addition to the sales performance solution. It makes it easy to compensate employees based on MBO campaigns. It’s a very flexible solution which can be a good option for as few as 50 payees, to as many as 50,000 payees, and it can be deployed on-premise or hosted.  Excentive Incentive Management is deployed across industries, and some implementations can process as many as 2 million transactions daily.

From the “regular” employee perspective, the application mostly consists of a repository of reports. These reports can be configured and customized by an administrator, but standard reports exist for most common information such as commission statements and performance review results.

Employees can also see the details of their compensation plans and can easily find out which commission was paid and find out if any transactions are missing.

Managers have access to additional information such as their team’s performance, salaries, etc.

Managers can also consult their employee’s records containing information about their past performance such as commissions earned in previous periods.

In addition to reports, managers can edit some of their team’s information including new salary figures, bonus values, based on constraints configured by the administrators.

One of the biggest features for managers is to be able to provide rating for their employees’ performance and to reuse all that info in a salary review process or a stock option allocation exercise, which are also supported by Excentive.

Finally, let’s look at some of the configuration of the solution, from the administrator’s perspective.
“Campaigns”, or the performance management component, can be configured in a few clicks from the campaigns menu.

Bonus and commission rules can be configured easily in a 3-step process. First, the properties of the rule are setup which includes the name of the rule and the dates for which it is effective. The rules engine can thus access the quantitative data (eg. sales by product/territory/period , margins, etc) as well as the quantitative performance indicators (eg. team spirit, customer loyalty, etc). This allows the calculation of the incentive (commission) as well as the bonus. Rules can be used for the classic earnings calculations as well as for recommendations and simulations.

The criteria step consists of specifying the conditions which must be met for the commission to fire.
This formula can be typed in, or created by clicking on the functions and other information stored in the database.

The resulting calculation is configured in the same way as the condition.

The reports we have looked at so far were all numbers presented in a tabular format, but it’s also possible to integrate visual elements to dashboards and reports.

Excentive’s solution also includes integrated modules to perform more complex tasks:

  • Hierarchy Manager: combine different dimensions such as region/office/people into multiple hierarchies necessary for workflow and approval processes.
  • Pool Manager: create teams and delegate ‘people-to-team’ assignments to local managers.
  • Mobility Manager: spot team changes and transfer people between departments/managers. Manage partial, time and team depending compensations
  • Culture Manager associate people with language, currency, location
  • Environment Manager which is a secure and fast way to move an application change from a development environment towards a test or production environment

Overall, Excentive is a slick web based application which shows a lot of promise if they can inspire enough trust from prospective clients. Since all modules are integrated in one solution at no additional cost, Excentive could be a good play for clients looking for not only incentive compensation management, but the entire spectrum of salary and performance management. Now could be a good time to negotiate a favorable price from the vendor, given that they are aggressively trying to enter this North American market.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Excentive
Merced Systems

Makana Solutions Launched Web Portal

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (3 votes, average: 3 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

I reviewed the new SPM solution Makana Motivator Pro earlier this year, and noted that there was a big piece missing; the portal.

One of the main advantages to implement an SPM solution is to increase visibility. Sales reps should perform better if they know exactly how they are performing, what they need to focus on, how much commission they have earned, etc. Managers also need to know how their team is performing, what could be done to improve their performance, who are the top/bottom performers, etc.

I also noted that the Makana portal was planning for the end of January… And it was delivered, as promised, on time. Before the portal, Motivator administrators had to send reports by e-mail. Now, users can just log in and access all of this information.  Not only does this reduce the burden on the administrator, it also provides more timely information to the reps.

As with the dashboards of other solutions I have reviewed, the Motivator Pro reports are interactive and allow to “drill down” the results to the transaction level. This is what the portal and the reports look like (click to enlarge):

Commission and Incentive Pay Statement – Transaction Detail

Commission Statement – Summary Information

Team Summary Report

Team Ranking Report

The portal still lacks some functionality observed in other solutions such as the ability to customize the reports to display company-specific information, a modeling feature to allow reps and administrators to play “what-if scenarios”, an “issue resolution” tool for reps to report problems with their commission, a plan communication feature to distribute plans to the reps through the portal, etc. But even with these pieces still missing, the web portal is a great step in the right direction!  It’s a great addition for Motivator Pro users and provides neat reports out-of-the-box at no additional cost.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Makana Solutions
Makana Motivator for Free!

Non-Cash Rewards Solution: IncentOne Review

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (3 votes, average: 3.33 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Once you have determined that it would be nice to offer non-cash rewards to reward a good performance, the challenge becomes to manage those incentives.

That’s where IncentOne comes in. IncentOne offers simple solutions that can help a business drive results. The concept is simple; employees earn points for completing various activities. These points could be tied to an employee evaluation, or directly to sales performance. Employees then redeem those points for a reward which they can select from IncentOne’s portal.

When the employees log in, they will have access to information about the things they need to do to earn points. And, they can see how many points they can earn for each of the pre-defined activities. More importantly, they will also see how many points in total they can Receive.

Once they are ready to redeem their points, they can visit the “Rewards” section. This section is pretty intuitive; there are many categories from which they can pick various rewards. Gift cards, merchandise, travel packages… even charity donations!

The IncentOne’s portal is customizable; the content , layout, colors and the company logo can all be changed from the administration tool.

The milestones and related award values are also configured within the administration interface.

As one could expect, IncentOne provides role-based access to the incentive program. Different “roles” are created, with various access levels for each of the roles. For example, an administrator could change everything, while the program manager could be restricted from creating new programs.

Finally, IncentOne provides many reports, both standard and customized. If you want a summary by program, an activity report by gender, by age group, etc, it’s all there “out-of-the-box”.

Many companies already have an incentive compensation system in place. I have seen many of these solutions used to calculate who deserved a certain non-cash reward. The most common incentive program I have come across is a recognition award for top performers, sometimes tied to a trip or award ceremony. However, managing more complex non-cash reward scenarios, and figuring out where the rewards are coming from while giving the employees the flexibility to choose what they want is often a big challenge.

IncentOne can integrate with sales performance management systems. The number of points could be calculated by the SPM system, and received by IncentOne for redemption. IncentOne is also an attractive solution because as with other solutions, its cost is based on the number of employees in the system per month. The standard configuration is also fairly quick and intuitive, which is different than the relatively high price-tag of an SPM solution implementation.

If you are looking at introducing non-cash rewards in your incentive strategy, I think that IncentOne is worth looking at.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Non-Cash Incentives
I don’t want to drive a Ferrari, I want a trip to Hawaii!