Vue Software

Archive for the 'Vendor / SPM Solution Review and Info' Category

Negotiating a SaaS Contract

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 4 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

I talked about SaaS Contract Negotiations before, but I found another great article from ERP Software Advice on this topic here. The author describes 9 points that can be negotiated within a SaaS agreement. Here is a short summary:

1. Pricing and Discounts: Obviously, published pricing can usually be negotiated, and the bigger the deal, the bigger the discount.
2. Additional Costs: Aside from the standard monthly fee, other costs can quickly add up, such as fees for additional users, customizations, integrations, third-party services, training and set-up fees.
3. Term: A longer term can mean a better deal.
4. Service Level Agreements: Make sure that SLAs – the vendor’s commitment to keeping the system up and running – are clearly defined in the contract.
5. Renewals: This process is an opportunity to renegotiate or exit a bad contract. Make sure there you are still in control when it’s renewal time.
6. Scalability Pricing: Find out what pricing options are available to increase the number of users and if there is the possibility to decrease it.
7. Support: The contract should describe the level of support that will be received: is it delivered via the web, email, phone? Is it 24 / 7?
8. Backups and Recovery: The contract should specify how often backups are performed, how long it will be kept, and if it is kept in a separate center in case of disaster.
9. Data Export: Can data be retrieved from the system?

Tags: ,

Related Posts:
Tips for SaaS Contract Negotiations, and Knowledge Transfer
SaaS – Future or Buzz?

Merced ICM… Two Years Later

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (8 votes, average: 3.5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

I’m back from my blogging “vacation” and I apologize to all my readers for this long delay. I’ve been extremely busy juggling projects and I started an MBA a few months ago which has been using most of my free time. I will do my best to do a better job at fitting blogging in my schedule.

For this first new post, I’d like to talk about Merced Systems. I covered Merced’s incentive solution (then called Merced Incentive Management or MIM) about two years ago, soon after it acquired Practique Associates. At that time, the big question was, is Merced going to be successful at integrating the incentive compensation tool to the rest of its products, and will it be able to compete against well established vendors such as Callidus and Varicent in the competitive US market.  Gaining credibility from clients, selling enterprise solutions and going live with them is a long cycle, and finally, after two years, some conclusion can be drawn.

The Company…
First, I’d like to talk about the company itself. Even with the recession, Merced Systems has managed to grow and post profits for 7 consecutive years. I’m pointing this out because in a world where most other SPM companies are relying on investments to develop solutions and gain market share, Merced has actually been making money – and reinvesting it into R&D to improve their product.  It now counts over 225 employees concentrated in its Silicon Valley and London offices, responsible for more than 125 customers deployed in over 20 countries. Merced’s big challenge at the moment is to hire enough smart people to sustain its rapid growth.

The Challenges…
One of the first challenges Merced needed to overcome to be successful in the US market was to develop the ability to implement and support its ICM solution in the United States as well. Now with over two years of ICM experience under its belt, this is no longer a concern.

The other hurdle that Merced needed to overcome was to attract large clients in the United States to show that it could be successful here as well. One of its first projects in the US was Nationwide. The goal was to help agents gain more visibility into their performance, to increase payment accuracy and to reduce calculation time. Merced ICM successfully managed to accomplish these goals, and the phase one of the project was completed in early 2010. Many customers in the United States are finally live or are currently being implemented; these customers include Bank of America, Otsuka and Dell. When I spoke with Mark Selcow, Merced System’s president, he pointed out that not only was Merced successful at gaining traction in the US market, but that it was also keeping its momentum in the European market. Merced recently announced the successful deployment of the ICM Suite at Kia Motors.

The Solution…
Now about the solution itself; as a reminder, in a nutshell, Merced ICM calculates compensation and incentives, and provides meaningful reports and dashboards. Since Merced acquired Practique, Selcow noted that Merced System’s engineers have been working very hard at integrating the incentive solution to the other tools of the Merced Suite comprising Merced Planning (for territory planning, quota planning and goal setting), Merced Intelligence (for sales and compensation analytics) and to the Merced Performance Suite (used for performance scorecards, ranking, and coaching). Selcow believes that scorecarding for seller self-correction and coaching to drive best sales behaviors are emerging trends in Sales Performance Management, and will become an important part of ICM/SPM solutions.

In my opinion, one of the biggest improvements recently brought to the incentive compensation suite is the Workflow Manager module. Workflow Manager allows users to setup various workflow that can range from dispute resolution and payment approval, to requiring approval to submit a manual adjustment, MBOs, or to make any changes to a plan component.

Two years ago I also showed screenshots of some standard reports and dashboards available with this solution. I had a hard time choosing a good adjective to describe them, but the first word that came to mind was “outdated”. Again, thanks to Merced’s competent engineering team, Merced ICM received a face lift with the Merced Analytics suite. Leveraging MicroStrategy Business Intelligence, Merced ICM delivers stunning reports and dashboards.

Significant improvements were also brought to the functionality and features of the application. Some of Merced’s innovations are based on their aggressive roadmap to become the number one sales solution provider (with Merced ICM being a significant part of that objective). However, Selcow also noted that Merced is a very agile company and that many innovations are a result of customer requests.

In Conclusion…
Another aspect that makes Merced different from its competitors is the ability for a client to choose to deploy it on-premise or on-demand and to have the ability to easily switch from one to the other if needs evolve.  With Callidus trying to be a completely recurring revenue business, or Varicent which is mostly on-premise, having the ability to choose between both delivery models can be a huge advantage.

But according to Mark Selcow, even with great technical solutions, what REALLY makes Merced Systems and Merced ICM different from the competition is its relentless focus on its customer’s success during and after an implementation. “We don’t see ourselves as a solution provider” he told me, “we become a true partner”.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Merced Incentive Management
Merced Systems

Ventana Research Sales Performance Management Value Index

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (4 votes, average: 3.75 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Ventana Research recently released their Sales Performance Management Value Index 2009 research paper which benchmarks four leading SPM solution suppliers and their solutions.

Unlike the Gartner SPM report which I have discussed a few times, the Ventana Value Index evaluates how well vendors’ offerings meet buyers’ requirements for software that enables and supports Sales Performance Management. The Index evaluates the software in the context of seven key categories: adaptability, manageability, reliability, usability, functionality, total cost of ownership, and return on investment.

You can jump on their website to download the executive summary after a quick registration.

The research notes that there are 5 vendors providing solutions across the sales performance management spectrum: Callidus Software, Merced Systems, Synygy, Varicent Software and Xactly Corporation. The other solution providers were out of the scope because their offerings are too broad (focus on CRM and Sales Force Automation) or too specific (focus on only a certain area of SPM or on a specific industry).

As expected, after compiling the weighted scores for each category, the value index difference is within 1% for the top 3 vendors (Callidus, Varicent and Merced), with Xactly lagging only a few percents behind. Most categories yielded very close results, with the largest (but still small) gaps in the capability and validation categories.

These results are not extremely surprising since the research focused on how well the SPM offerings met the buyers’ requirements, and since most SPM solutions offer very similar core functionality. However, this doesn’t mean that there are no significant differences in how, or how well the solutions handle various SPM requirements.

As for Synygy, some things could be inferred from a company concerned to be benchmarked against competitors by an independent research firm.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Align, Optimize and Understand
Callidus Software Launches Executive Briefing Series, “Survive and Thrive: Secrets to Selling More

Varicent SPM 6.0 and Presenter Review

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (8 votes, average: 3.13 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Varicent announced a new major release of their application – Varicent SPM 6.0 – at their user conference on Monday. The new features of this release include a new module called Presenter (a tool to build interactive sales reports), Model Manager (a tool to facilitate the management of multiple compensation models / lines of business), and CRM Integration (providing the ability to embed Varicent SPM into Microsoft Dynamics CRM). I spent the past 3 days training on this new release of Varicent SPM, and in particular on the Presenter module which I will review now.

Presenter allows to create and configure custom reports, and to publish them to the web. In the past, Varicent users had to use the “Web Forms” module to create similar reports, but web forms are more complex to build, and lack key features such as the ability to embed graphs. This new module is supposed to empower business users to design their own reports, directly from within the Varicent SPM application.

Reports consist of 4 key components storing data:
- Calculations
- Parameters (restrictions on the results being displayed)
- Scalars (variable returning single value)
- Sources (where the information is coming from)

As well as other building blocks: Images, Text, Controls, Scalars, Fixed Grid, Data Grids and Charts. Creating a report only consists of adding these elements to the empty report page.

The positioning of the objects on the report is fairly straightforward and consists of creating tables and inserting the objects in their own cell. In order to position everything perfectly, tables can be embedded into each other (a new table created within the cell of another table), etc. The positioning of the objects can be fine tuned by adjusting the cell’s alignment settings, borders and cell spacing. In other words, positioning objects in Presenter’s reports feels exactly like designing a web page a few years ago before CSS became a standard.

Presenter also includes many other formatting features which should be familiar from Excel. For example, borders and cell shading can be adjusted in a very similar way, and it is even easy to setup some conditional formatting (such as a cell being highlighted in yellow if a commission is over a certain amount). Reports can also include links to other reports which allows to “drill down” on specific results. Presenter reports can be made very “dynamic” by including dropdown menus (called pick lists by Varicent) to filter results for certain people, product lines, etc.

Once the objects are inserted into the report, clicking on the “Preview” tab shows how the report would look like on the web once it is published, using actual calculation results.

So can “business users” really create their own reports? Presenter seems to be much easier to use than other BI/reporting applications such as Actuate and Business Objects and does not require any reporting experience. Furthermore, simple reports can be created fairly rapidly. This being said, the ‘complexity’ lies in figuring out which sources or calculations need to be used, and also to be able to create these objects when required. For someone with Varicent implementation experience, the learning curve should be very quick.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Varicent
Varicent Insight 2009

CellarStone Releases New SPM solution: EasyCommission

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (16 votes, average: 2.19 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

EasyCommission is a new on-demand application for small companies.  The press release claims that it is very flexible and easy to use.

But as we discussed before, flexibility often comes at the expense of complexity.  In this first release of the application, many features were kept out, presumable to make the application easier to use.  For example, it does not support quota based commissions, draws/caps, and splits between more than 2 payees.  It also does not provide any e-mail capability.

Maybe we’ll have a review coming up… But for now, if you are curious to see what the application looks like, there are plenty of screen captures here.

What I find very interesting about EasyCommission is the pricing model; I haven’t seen this in any other SaaS solution.

There is a free edition that sets a limit of 1 administrator and 4 reps.  This free version limits “advanced functionality” and there is no support.  The economy edition has a limit of 19 reps.  Again, functionality is limited and support is on a “per incident basis”.  Finally, the regular version unlocks all the features, and full support is included.  What I find very interesting, is that with the free and economy editions, users will be shown advertising within the application.

CellarStone also offers a more robust solution called QCommission which can support up to 10,000 payees according to their website.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Sales Performance Management Solutions for ‘Very Small’ Sales Forces
It’s Varicent’s Turn to Report Record Revenues for 2007

Excentive Incentive Management Review

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (15 votes, average: 3.73 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Here is my latest Incentive Compensation Management application review. This week I am reviewing a relatively unknown (in North America) solution called Excentive Incentive Management.  Excentive was incorporated in 2002. Since then, they have gained a lot of popularity in France and have signed major clients such as Canon, Orange, and Air France. Earlier this year, they raised 700,000 Euros ($880,000 US) to accelerate international growth, part of over $1 million raised in recent months to fuel global expansion.

They also assembled an additional team driven by 10 seasoned managers active in the globalization of companies such as SAP, Hyperion, and OutlookSoft. One of their key target markets is of course North America, so we may soon start seeing some Excentive implementations over here if they can overcome some major challenges ahead, namely convincing prospective clients that they have the capability to deliver and support their implementations in the US, and that they are financially stable.

What is particularly interesting about the Excentive solution is that it includes performance management modules in addition to the sales performance solution. It makes it easy to compensate employees based on MBO campaigns. It’s a very flexible solution which can be a good option for as few as 50 payees, to as many as 50,000 payees, and it can be deployed on-premise or hosted.  Excentive Incentive Management is deployed across industries, and some implementations can process as many as 2 million transactions daily.

From the “regular” employee perspective, the application mostly consists of a repository of reports. These reports can be configured and customized by an administrator, but standard reports exist for most common information such as commission statements and performance review results.

Employees can also see the details of their compensation plans and can easily find out which commission was paid and find out if any transactions are missing.

Managers have access to additional information such as their team’s performance, salaries, etc.

Managers can also consult their employee’s records containing information about their past performance such as commissions earned in previous periods.

In addition to reports, managers can edit some of their team’s information including new salary figures, bonus values, based on constraints configured by the administrators.

One of the biggest features for managers is to be able to provide rating for their employees’ performance and to reuse all that info in a salary review process or a stock option allocation exercise, which are also supported by Excentive.

Finally, let’s look at some of the configuration of the solution, from the administrator’s perspective.
“Campaigns”, or the performance management component, can be configured in a few clicks from the campaigns menu.

Bonus and commission rules can be configured easily in a 3-step process. First, the properties of the rule are setup which includes the name of the rule and the dates for which it is effective. The rules engine can thus access the quantitative data (eg. sales by product/territory/period , margins, etc) as well as the quantitative performance indicators (eg. team spirit, customer loyalty, etc). This allows the calculation of the incentive (commission) as well as the bonus. Rules can be used for the classic earnings calculations as well as for recommendations and simulations.

The criteria step consists of specifying the conditions which must be met for the commission to fire.
This formula can be typed in, or created by clicking on the functions and other information stored in the database.

The resulting calculation is configured in the same way as the condition.

The reports we have looked at so far were all numbers presented in a tabular format, but it’s also possible to integrate visual elements to dashboards and reports.

Excentive’s solution also includes integrated modules to perform more complex tasks:

  • Hierarchy Manager: combine different dimensions such as region/office/people into multiple hierarchies necessary for workflow and approval processes.
  • Pool Manager: create teams and delegate ‘people-to-team’ assignments to local managers.
  • Mobility Manager: spot team changes and transfer people between departments/managers. Manage partial, time and team depending compensations
  • Culture Manager associate people with language, currency, location
  • Environment Manager which is a secure and fast way to move an application change from a development environment towards a test or production environment

Overall, Excentive is a slick web based application which shows a lot of promise if they can inspire enough trust from prospective clients. Since all modules are integrated in one solution at no additional cost, Excentive could be a good play for clients looking for not only incentive compensation management, but the entire spectrum of salary and performance management. Now could be a good time to negotiate a favorable price from the vendor, given that they are aggressively trying to enter this North American market.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Excentive
Merced Systems