Incentive Compensation and Sales Performance Management Survey

Tag Archive for 'Best Practices'

Event Calendar and Upcoming Events

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

This is just a quick reminder to check out the LeapComp SPM Event Calendar once in a while, or to subscribe to my event RSS feed.

There are two exciting webinars taking place tomorrow; Best Practices for Sales Compensation Management, and Salary Incentives and Strategies in Executive Recruitment in a Challenging Economy.

Don’t miss them, and if you attend, please come back to discuss.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
LeapComp Launches Incentive Compensation Event Calendar
In the News this Week…

Webinar Summary: Insurance Industry Best Practices

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 3 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Last week I attended the Sales Performance Accenture Webinar on Insurance Industry Best Practices by Jon Walheim, Partner – US Insurance Marketing, Sales and Service and Jason Angelos – Partner, Global Incentive Compensation Management.

Accenture performed a study with insurers and asked them which 3 topics were most important in the overall market place.  54% of the respondents selected “improve sales performance”, 49% selected “increase retention” and 36% selected “improve service performance”.  This says a lot on the focus on sales performance management solutions!

In this same study, Accenture also identified that the highest level of priority regarding customer acquisition and retention was to attract new customer and to focus on retention.  Insurance companies also hope to improve their performance through training, specialized tolls and sales support.

“Imagine if all 15,000 Exclusive Agents exhibit target behavior set XYZ for a customer situation XYZ.  No guessing.  No interpretation.”

Accenture’s framework for targeting value in sales transformation is to increase revenue, decrease cost and improve predictability.  Sales performance management solutions can assist with each of those “levers”.  ICM can impact each of those levers.  Revenues can be increased with increased flexibility in incentive plan design, more insight to data and self-service tools, and analytics.  Costs can be decreased with accurate incentive compensation and easy plan administration.  Predictability can be attained with plan modeling features.

Jon also mentioned that behavior is driven by only three factors: ability, motivation and context.  For an individual to exhibit the proper behavior, he must have the skills and knowledge for the job, and be the right person into the right role.  Performance objectives must be specified and measured, and the person must be motivated and encouraged to show target behaviors.  Finally they must have the right work assigned to them, have the right tolls, and have access to the right information.

Here is another attempt at justifying investing in incentive compensation from a return on investment perspective.  According to Accenture’s research, investments in programs to motivate and reward sales people, have the greatest potential to impact profits.  The impact on better motivating and rewarding people, and at attracting and retaining people could represent 23 $M on pre-tax profit for moving from average to high performance for a 1 billion dollar business unit.

Best practices for ICM Implementations
Accenture made several recommendations for ICM implementations:

  • Simplify operations
  • Optimize controls
  • Don’t try to gain efficiency if it compromises sales performance
  • Strive to develop new capabilities to deliver improved flexibility and speed to market
  • Optimize compensation plans and focus where it counts
  • Improve reporting to increase trust with the end users.
  • Provide single source of sales performance results
  • Manage software vendors to shape future product functionality
  • Enlist a deeply skilled integration partner to increase delivery capability and decrease risk.

I’m glad I took some notes during the presentation, because even if we were told that we could obtain the presentation from Accenture after the webinar, Accenture refused to share it with consulting companies!  You might have more luck than I did by contacting Jon by e-mail here:  jon.walheim@accenture.com

Tags: , , , , ,

Related Posts:
The Haunted Winchester Mystery House

SPM Analytics Webinar Tomorrow, 1PM Central

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Remember to join the free Webinar: 5 Best Practices with Analyzing Sales Performance, hosted by OpenSymmetry and presented by Greg Livengood.

When? Tuesday, July 22nd 1pm (Central).

Find out more about the presenter here.

Register here.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Webinar Galore - 2 SPM Webinars Tomorrow
Upcoming Sales Performance Analytics Webinar, July 22nd 1pm Central

Offshoring Sales Performance Management Implementation Components

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Based on my experience and on common sense, there are some project components which are easier to offshore than others.

Requirements and Functional Design
Early phases of a project are more challenging to offshore; these phases include the requirement gathering and the functional planning of the project. Offshoring these activities can be difficult because they require a lot of interaction with stakeholders, users and subject matter experts. This type of interaction usually works much better face-to-face than over the phone.
Technical Design, Implementation and Testing
Once the architecture of the project is established, components of the technical design, implementation and testing phases are good candidates to be offshored. Interaction with project stakeholders will obviously be necessary, but the “what” of what needs to be done should be obvious.
Sales Performance Management Implementation
There are many strategies to leverage an offshore team to implement a sales performance management application. Compensation plans can be divided between on-shore and offshore teams, or both teams can collaborate on all the plans. I prefer the collaboration approach; coordination will be a bit more complicated, but many of the risks will be mitigated. As a result, the onshore team will have a clear idea on the status of the offshore team at all time, and there will be less communication issues such as misunderstandings of the requirement and functional design documents.
Here is a list of several common SPM activities which in my experience are good candidates to be offshored. If the design documents are detailed enough, there is no reason why an offshore team could not work on everything. However, there is probably less risk in offshoring well defined activities.
  1. ETL: A large project will use an Extract, Transfer and Load (ETL) tool to move data where it can be used by the SPM solution. With proper access, an offshore team can make a significant contribution to this process.
  2. Configuration Management: An implementation is usually carried in different environments; development, various testing envionments, and production. Moving the latest files from one environment to the next can be very time consuming, and often can’t be performed while a team works in the environment.
  3. Reference Data: Loading all the reference data including participants, titles, positions, relationships, territories, etc are activities which will not impact the building of plans, until required for testing.
  4. Quotas, rate tables and lookup tables: Creating and updating these objects can be a very time consuming activity.
  5. Formulas and rules: Sometimes, several formulas and rules which are almost identical to each other are required. Not all SPM solutions have an easy “clone” feature, making this activity very tedious.
  6. Processing: Also called pipeline in Callidus TrueComp, with a large number of participants and of transaction (in late testing phases), processing can take up to several hours. It can be very nice for the onshore team to work on the implementation during the day and come back the next morning to find the results ready and analysis of issues that occured.
  7. Testing: Testing can be a tedious job. As I discussed before, test scripts should exist which will be executed again and again… and again. Some of the first testing phases such as unit testing and system testing can be almost entirely offshored, but later phases such as integration testing and user acceptance testing are often kept onshore to be able to better monitor quality.
Note: Offshoring all the boring and repetitive activities could have negative impacts on the moral and efficiency of the offshore team, just as it would on any team.

Does anyone have other examples of SPM components which can be offshored easily?

Tags: , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Outsourcing and Offshoring your SPM Implementation
ICM Implementation Offshoring Pros and Cons

Upcoming Sales Performance Analytics Webinar, July 22nd 1pm Central

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

There is a very promising webinar coming up, hosted by OpenSymmetry and presented by Greg Livengood.

I particularly wanted to promote this event because I worked with Greg for several months on an Accenture project, and I know that when it comes to Sales Performance Analytics, he REALLY knows what he is talking about. Expect a very insightful presentation by a friendly, dynamic and easy-going individual who built a world-class reputation as a sales performance analytics leader and pioneer.

Event Description:

With the economy in a downward slope, sales leaders more than ever need ‘Sales Performance Analytics’ and efficient ways to proactively identify potential problems and opportunities.

Most companies have the information they need to improve sales performance, however, many sales managers are challenged with accessing and correctly interpreting the data.

Greg Livengood, Senior Business Analyst with Livengood Consulting Group, will discuss how to leverage the 5 best practices in sales performance analytics that can boost your sales force performance.

• Visualize Sales Performance
• Develop Corporate Alignment
• Simplicity
• Build a Self-Sufficient Solution
• Engagement at the Executive Level

Click here to register.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
SPM Analytics Webinar Tomorrow, 1PM Central
Upcoming Free Webinar: Industry Banking Best Practices for Maximizing Your Customer Value and Sales Behavior

ICM Implementation Offshoring Pros and Cons

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Projects can be partially or completely outsourced. The outsourcing can be done partially or entirely offshore. The most common scenario I usually encounter is when a company outsources a project to a consulting company. The consulting team usually works on-site, and often have several resources located offshore. There seems to be a trend for consultant who used to work on-site, to be allowed to work remotely.

As I pointed out, many EIM/SPM solution vendors and consulting companies will discuss the benefits which can be achieved by outsourcing parts of an Incentive Compensation Management implementation. I agree with these benefits, but there are also many challenges which must be carefully managed to be successful.
Working with an offshore team through a consulting company reduces a lot of the risk; you don’t have to worry about contracts, quality, infrastructure, intellectual properties, etc. Furthermore, consulting companies usually have a good relationship with their offshore arm.

Setting aside all ethical and macro-economics discussions about offshoring, here are some of the main pros and cons.

Main offshoring benefits:
Labor: Skilled labor can be very expensive, but it can especially be very difficult to find. Even a large consulting company may have problems finding an available consultant with the right skill set.
Cost: Offshore locations are usually developing countries where labor is significantly cheaper.
Speed: When a project is well managed, more people usually mean a more aggressive schedule.
Work 24/7: For North-American people, working with a country such as India makes it “easy” to work around the clock.
Some of the challenges to be managed
Communication and language barriers: Most of us have some experience working with team members who are located somewhere else, and have faced communication challenges related to this. Offshoring brings another layer to the communication challenges, a topic to which I will dedicate another article.
Coordination: Because of all the communication challenges, complex coordination activities become even more complex.
Cultures: Each culture have their own principles and values. Not being mindful of cultural differences can lead to big problems.

Cost: Savings could be only marginal, especially with rising labor costs in some countries (especially in India)

Quality: This is a challenge for on-site and offshore team alike. Offshore teams are usually very good at achieving very high quality standards. However, quality is still perceived as a higher risk with offshore teams.

Security: Quality is another concern most companies have, especially when dealing with confidential employment information. There are very secure mechanisms to collaborate, even across continents, but security is a topic which requires particular attention.

Key to Success

In my opinion, the key to successfully leveraging an offshore team is in:

  • Having a good manager and team leads experienced with offshore projects
  • Having A good [formalized] communication strategy, “hand-off” mechanism between onshore and offshore teams and processes in place
  • Having a good understanding of which project components can be tackled “at night” by the offshore team and handed to the onshore team “in the morning”, and vice-versa.

Tags: , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Outsourcing and Offshoring your SPM Implementation
Group Competition Incentive Pros and Cons