Incentive Compensation and Sales Performance Management Survey

Tag Archive for '“Canadian Professional Sales Association”'

I don’t want to drive a Ferrari, I want a trip to Hawaii!

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 4 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Non-cash rewards are not a new concept, and are commonly used to motivate employees, reward them for their performance and encourage specific behaviors.

A recent article by Christopher Guly in the summer edition of the Canadian Professional Sales Association’s Contact magazine explains how everybody would want an extra cash bonus at the end of the year, but that it is likely this bonus would be forgotten a few months later. According to Duane Penner, VP of sales at Roadtrips Inc, incentives tied to memorable experiences can make a bigger difference and set a company apart.

Roadtrips create “once-in-a-lifetime” events for salespeople; from five-star strips to the Monaco Grand Prix to Ferrari driving experiences. I think the key to Roadtrips’ program, is that employees have the choice to choose what they want to do, depending on their performance. One could choose a Broadway show in Vegas, or attend the Super Bowl game – it’s up to them.

I say that choice is key, because we have probably all been in a situation where a well intentioned employer rewarded some employee with something that most people didn’t care about: Participation in a golf tournament for non-golfers, a ski weekend for non-skiers, a gift-certificate in a clothing store to someone who hates to shop, a paper weight with the company’s logo on it, or a weekend retreat in a nice hotel (with 10 other co-workers).

Employers are realizing more and more the potential impact of flexible non-cash rewards. That’s the driver for many sales performance management companies to start offering tools to manage these rewards. Last week, Xactly launched its non-cash rewards application on the Force.com platform. This application spans the entire non-cash reward management spectrum, from creating contests for specific employee groups, to attainment tracking, to online redemption of points.
Other companies such as Restaurant.com leverage this trend by offering discounted gift certificates ($25 certificate for $10 or less) to companies looking at creating non-cash reward incentive programs.

Cash versus Non-Cash Rewards
In most scenarios, it is probably safe to assume that a sales person would not be thrilled to have his or her cash bonus replaced by a points program. However, non-cash rewards could be integrated to their total rewards and I have seen them work very well to reward some subjective “performance” such as embodying corporate values.

Using non-cash rewards should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis – it may be a good decision for some organization or for a certain context, but may not be right for everyone.

Perks versus Rewards
If the goal is to distinguish the company, increase motivation, increase employee retention and attract new talents, other non-cash “incentives” can be used. The company where I had the best time working had many perks for the employees such as free pops and juices and pool tables. Google recognized the importance of such perks, and they are especially famous for their free cafeteria. They could have paid every employee $5,000 more, but their employees probably do not look at it this way.

Non-cash rewards, non-cash rewards programs and applications to manage non-cash rewards are quickly emerging. Now could be a good time to determine if it could be a good enhancement to your compensation plans, to remain an attractive employer and increase your workforce’s productivity and motivation!

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Non-Cash Incentives
Motivating your Sales Team to go for the Gold: What can you do to turn your reps into an Olympic sales team?

Tweak your Sales Compensation Plan - A Tale of Diverging Opinions

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

In case you are not familiar with it, the Canadian Professional Sales Association (CPSA) has an excellent magazine called “Contact”. The best part is that this magazine is entirely available online, for free, and without any registration. Today I wanted to bring your attention to an article by Jay Somerset called “The Compensation Challenge” which appeared in the Contact Spring 2008 edition.

“It may be time to change - or tweak - your sales compensation plan to better compete in today’s employee-driven market, but if it is done incorrectly you could send your sales team packing. ”

Indeed, tweaking a sales plan is tricky business. Stats mentioned in the article back this up: Less than 10% of North American sales organizations redesign their comp plans in a given year, while the other 90 percent only perform minor tweaks. I think ideally, closer to 100% organizations should only perform minor tweaks. Redesigning a plan could be a sign that it had not been planned out properly, and sometimes organizations are compulsive about trying new plans rather than improving their existing plans by tweaking them.

Diverging Opinions
Greg Blysniuk, president of TopLine Sales Compensation Solutions in Toronto advocates simplicity. He says that sales managers often believe their compensation plans must be sophisticated and complex to compete; Greg believes one or two quantitative measures is all what is required to incent people and to ensure the plans are easy to understand.

David Johnston, president of Sales Resource Group Inc in Oakville, Ontario believes compensation plans should factor in qualitative metrics. “Qualitative metrics can be measured according to milestones or key events”.

ICM Applications:
Greg says the main barrier to adopt an ICM application is their cost. He is in favor of using Excel spreadsheets for compensation data collection and analysis. He says that “Spreadsheets are simple to use, inexpensive and they do the basic job”.

David does not agree; he says that spreadsheets are “too basic and error-prone”. He also says that “sales is much too complex for a spreadsheet”. He concludes that there is a middle ground with smaller-scale on-demand ICM applications such as PlanIt (which I reviewed previously), that do not require a large upfront cost.

The Bottom Line:

No matter which approach is used, I’m sure we can all agree that the goal is to make the compensation plans as straightforward as possible. If there is a valid reason for a plan to use some “complex” measurement, fine… as long as it’s easy to understand and clearly communicated to the payees.

As for the need for an ICM application; if an organization is small enough with a low enough order volume and is happy with their current spreadsheet, and if they don’t see any benefits in real-time analytics and dashboards, auditability, modeling, forecasting, and all the other benefits provided by an ICM solution, then there probably no incentive to replace the spreadsheet by such an application.

I agree with Greg that spreadsheets do the “basic job”, but in my experience it does not take very long even for small organizations to realize that the “basic job” is not enough anymore to keep a competitive advantage.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
My Compensation Framework
Makana Motivator for Free!