Incentive Compensation and Sales Performance Management Survey

Tag Archive for 'Centive'

Exclusive Interview with Christopher Cabrera of Xactly, on Centive Acquisition

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (25 votes, average: 3.08 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Christopher Cabrera, Founder, President and CEO of Xactly

Xactly Corporation completed the acquisition of Centive barely a week ago. Christopher Cabrera, Founder, President and CEO of Xactly, tells us what this acquisition bodes for Xactly and the SPM SaaS market.

LeapComp: Hi Chris – congratulations on the news!
CC: Thanks, Julien. It’s an exciting time for Xactly and the on-demand sales performance management market.

LeapComp: How long have you been planning to acquire another company? Was the state of the economy a catalyst for the acquisition?
CC: As a fast-growing company, we are always looking for ways to accelerate market share and customer value. And when the opportunity arose with Centive, we saw that the synergies of combining our two businesses would offer significant value to customers, partners and prospects.

As for the state of the economy, SaaS in general is experiencing a surge in adoption rates because the model makes good economic sense, while sales performance management applications in particular make good strategic sense. The combination of Xactly and Centive will result in even stronger on-demand SPM solutions that will provide value – in both good and challenging economic times – to companies of all sizes, across virtually every industry.

LeapComp: Why did you choose to acquire Centive in particular? Were other companies also considered?
CC: Like Xactly, Centive is a 100% on-demand company focused on SPM, and a strong player in the market. We speak the same language, share similar cultures and we frequently approached the same prospects. In acquiring Centive, we can very quickly increase the scale and functionality of an already broad on-demand SPM product portfolio.

LeapComp: How does Xactly’s acquisition of Centive impact the SPM market? How will Centive fit into Xactly’s strategy?
CC: The acquisition significantly strengthens the on-demand sector of the SPM industry – which is the fastest-growing area. Customers looking for a pure SaaS solution can have confidence in the viability of a well-capitalized company committed to delivering the broadest and richest suite of SPM functionality.

At the same time, the acquisition meets Xactly’s own strategic needs as we offer a unified SPM product platform that will address important product opportunities and enable us to focus even more strongly on innovation and growth strategies. The acquisition also provides us with enhanced distribution through a broader partner ecosystem, and strengthens our go-to-market resources through broader sales and services coverage.

LeapComp: What do you believe will be your greatest post-acquisition integration challenge?

CC: Customer satisfaction will be our top priority. Xactly has traditionally had very high customer-satisfaction and renewal rates. We’re reaching out now to every Centive customer and partner to communicate our commitment and our plans to make this a smooth transition with minimal disruption. We have communicated that we intend to support both product platforms for a minimum of 18 months while we work towards a unified product roadmap.

LeapComp: With this acquisition, who do you see as your biggest competitor?
CC: Our greatest competitor is, and always has been, organizations’ use of spreadsheets and other manual methods to manage incentive sales compensation and sales performance. The vast majority of companies are still stuck in this paradigm, much to their disadvantage. Economical SaaS solutions like Xactly’s make it a lot easier and more cost effective to automate these processes, become more strategic in managing incentive compensation, and ultimately boost sales performance compared to far more costly, legacy, on-premise software solutions.

LeapComp: What is the combined Xactly and Centive product roadmap? What are the future plans of Xactly?
CC: Xactly will spend the next several weeks carefully evaluating the technologies before determining a unified product roadmap. During this time, Xactly will support both product platforms – Xactly Incent with add-on modules and Centive Compel – for a minimum of 18 months to ensure ongoing customer success and a seamless transition to new features/functionality and products. The ultimate goal is to provide the best of both products within a single interface for customers.

LeapComp: How is the transaction between Xactly and Centive expected to benefit current customers of both companies?
CC: Customers will have a larger, stronger company to partner with, possessing more resources to meet customer needs and ensure their success. The combined companies will drive market leadership by offering the most robust SPM platform on the market, and by accelerating innovation across the SPM spectrum – all to the good of customers.

LeapComp: Until both solutions and client base are “merged”, will new customers still have the option to choose one of the solution, or is Xactly Incent now the only option?
CC: As we move to a unified product roadmap, we are encouraging prospects to select the platform that best meets their requirements and will help them determine which solution is the best fit for them. We will ensure that investments made by new prospects will be preserved, and will deliver feature enhancements for Centive Compel customers as they have been committed to customers.

LeapComp: In 18 months, when the solutions as we know them today are no longer supported, is there a risk that any re-implementation will be required for either or both of Centive or Xactly’s customers?
CC: Details on a migration program, should it be required, will be communicated once a unified product roadmap is determined. It’s our intent to minimize disruption. Ultimately, the customer will come out ahead as we intend to provide the strongest possible solution on the market.

LeapComp: Chris, thanks for your time and good luck with the challenges ahead!
CC: Thank you. We’re looking forward to a great year.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Centive
BREAKING NEWS – Xactly acquires Centive

BREAKING NEWS – Xactly acquires Centive

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (9 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

I heard this rumor earlier, but before spreading it I wanted to be sure it was true. After all, this is not the first time that I hear rumors about Centive!

And it is true…

Xactly Corporation just posted the press release about the Centive acquisition.

“In a stock-based transaction, Xactly has acquired all of Centive’s assets and its employee base. The combined companies will operate under the name Xactly… Xactly will fully support both companies’ product platforms for a minimum of 18 months to ensure the seamless transition of customers to a unified product roadmap. The company will continue to be led by Xactly’s management team, and will maintain its headquarters in San Jose, California.”

I expected something like this to happen eventually.  Xactly secured $30 million last May, putting them in a good position to acquire another company, while having enough cash to survive a recession. That 30 million dollar also made Xactly a company that would have been very expensive to acquire.

The Centive acquisition is a huge change in the SPM market! First, because both Xactly Incent and Centive Compel were leading solutions in the 100% SaaS market focused on the small to mid market segments. As we know, SaaS companies rely on a price per payee per month model… That means that to be viable, a certain number of payees is required; and Xactly just managed to significantly increase their number of payees in a snap.

Secondly, as I said before, vendor’s balance sheets are very important, especially in a tough economic environment. One of the biggest concerns of companies selecting an SPM vendor at the moment is: “will this company be around for the next several years”. And that’s a valid concern, considering that many companies have revenues MUCH larger than those of the vendor they are selecting. By increasing its size (and revenues) significantly, Xactly should be able to reassure many of those companies.

The next hurdle will be to convince everyone that in 18 months, both companies will be able to be transitioned to a unified product roadmap. And the other major hurdle will be to actually manage to do that, without having to re-implement all the Xactly and/or Centive implementations.

Re-implementation… That’s probably the biggest concern of Centive clients who received that news today. Since Xactly made the commitment to support both solutions for the next 18 months, the news probably means “business as usual” for most people… for the next year. In the meantime, Xactly engineers have 18 months to figure out a clever way to make the transition.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Centive
Enterprise Incentive Management News

SPM Vendor Selection Part 4: Vendor Demos / Interviews

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

In my opinion, this is the most important and valuable part of the sales performance management vendor selection process.  The demos can take different forms; for a small on-demand project, these demos are often performed online.  For a large implementation, the remaining competing vendors will usually send a team on-site to present.  This is the first opportunity to really see the look and feel of the solution. The RFP scores of the invited vendors could be very close, so this is where they get the chance to distinguish themselves.  A job candidate is rarely hired without a face-to-face interview; this is it!

How long should the demo last?
A small SaaS solution such as Xactly or Centive could be presented in a few hours, but it really depends on the complexity of the solution.  The length of the demo also depends on how much time you have and how much time the vendor is willing to invest in trying to win the bid.  My advice is that for a large implementation (Callidus, Varicent, Merced, etc) half a day could be enough for an overview of the application, and a full day is not too much to go a bit more in details.

What questions should be asked?
SPM Vendor should be given specific instructions on what they should be demonstrating, which could vary depending on the audience.  Ask yourself what is of interest to the evaluators; the plan configuration and administration?  Reports?  Analytics?  If the evaluators are managers / directors, showing how the configuration plan elements is done may not be necessary.

Demo Scripts
The best way to find out that an SPM solution can do what you would like it to do, is to ask the vendors to configure a few plans.  Don’t only provide the plan details, also provide some sample data.  The sample data only needs to be a few transactions, there is no point in providing hundreds of them.  When the vendors walk you through their solution and results, it will provide a good overview of how their solution works.  If you choose to ask the vendors to implement a few things for the demo, provide them with at least a week to work on them to ensure they have the time to complete the activity.  It’s fair to ask them to create simple rules “on the spot”, or to modify some of their plans, but if you ask them to implement several plans during the demo, valuable time will be wasted.  Also, keep in mind that the goal is to review the solution, and not the ability of the sales engineer to work under high pressure.

Demo Evaluation
Just like for the RFP, a scoring grid should be created ahead of time and distributed to all the evaluators.  Another tip; leave a lot of space for comments.  If the evaluators have laptops, they could even fill the evaluation in a spreadsheet.  It’s never fun to do manual data entry if it can be avoided.  A question I often get is how much should the demo evaluation be worth compared to the RFP.  This is another “it depends” answer.  Typically, I recommend that the evaluation be worth at least 50% of the total score; if it’s a full day demonstration, probably more…  for a short online demonstration, probably less.

When evaluating the different demos, beware of evaluating the quality of the presentation rather than the quality of the solution.  As we know, some people are very good at presenting, and some are not quite as good.  You would think that sales engineers have all mastered the art of the presentation, but they are not all made equal and some can be better than others.  Try to evaluate the actual solution and not how good the SE is (and that can be hard to do!).

One last note about the demo evaluation:  if the vendor is now showing you what you want to see (even if this should have been made clear before the presentation begins), make sure to let them know, and they can probably adjust the focus of their presentation.

Logistics
If the vendors are coming for an on-site visit, find out of they need an Internet connection.  Also make sure you have a working projector!

A Note for the Vendors Reading This
Don’t rely on the internet connection mentioned above.  Bring your solution installed on a laptop, or even bring a server with you if you need it, but don’t count on this connection to work or to be stable!

Adding the Scores
We now have scores for the RFPs and the demos.  Adding them should reflect who the winner should be.  There are a few more steps before selecting this winner, but once the demos are completed, you should have a good idea of who the preferred vendor is.  Just as with the RFP, I would recommend a debrief following the demos to discuss impressions, strengths, weaknesses, likes, dislikes, etc.  If you had more than 2 vendors presenting, I would recommend selecting the top two vendors for the next steps.

Next Steps
We’re almost there…  we still have to do our due diligence and perform reference checks before we start contract negotiations. I will discuss this in my next post.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Resource Center
SPM Vendor Selection Part 5: Reference Calls

ZS Associates’ Javelin Incentive Manager - Part 1

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (6 votes, average: 3.33 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

In this post I will describe what I have seen and my impressions of the Javelin Incentive Manager. When logging in, as could be expected, the user is greeted by some message. From there, the user is able to access the Incentive Manager or many of the other modules I will cover in a separate post.

When selecting “Incentive Manager”, the administrator can see or create a new scenario. The demo was for the on-demand version of the application, so each environment (modeling, development, production, etc) where all located on the same server. These environments are only distinguished by a “scenario”. Xactly also uses this concept of scenario, but it is limited to their modeling environment.


When selecting an existing scenario, the different plans and components are displayed.


All of the plan logic is component-based instead of being rule-based. It seems like most solutions I have seen (except Centive and Merced Systems) follow a rule-based approach: credit rules generate credits, some measurement rules aggregate and transform the credits, and finally the commission rules transforms the credits into a commission amount. Javelin Incentive Manager uses a completely different approach which is based on components and workflows. The plans are built by assembling those components. This component approach appears to be very similar to the Informatica ETL interface.

Each component is reusable from workflow to workflow, and can easily be added and named appropriately.

Selecting a component will show its details, which can be edited on the same screen:

Another feature I liked from Javelin Incentive Manager is the ability to look directly at the output of any component once the results are processed. I’m sure this makes troubleshooting and debugging much easier! The component also shows in a different color of a modification caused the results to be out-of-date – this means it’s time to re-process the batch to get updated results if required.

Quick-Start

Future versions of Javelin Incentive Manager will have a “wizard” called Quick Start to create common workflow structures without even having to add components individually. This feature is already in beta testing. I haven’t actually seen it in action, but it looks good.

More about ZS Javelin Incentive Manager coming in my next post…

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
ZS Associates
ZS Associates’ Javelin Suite Additional Modules

MarketScope for Sales Incentive Compensation Management Software 2008

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 3 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Michael Dunne, the VP of research and sales incentive compensation analyst for Gartner, released the new marketscope research on July 30, 2008.

One of his key finding; the sales ICM market grew by 20% in 2007, up from 15% in 2006.  Another interesting fact: collectively, the vendor community only captured 300 million in revenue worldwide. Finally, less than 10% of sales organizations with more than 100 persons receiving variable compensation have deployed prepackaged sales applications, with North America representing more than 80% of the world market.

My interpretation of this is that the ICM market is still very small, still has a lot of room to grow, and has an accelerating growth.  That’s great news for me!

The biggest changes in the overall marketscope rating since 2007 is Varicent which moved up a position, from “promising” to “positive”, and Practique Associates (recently acquired by Merced Systems) which moved up from “Caution” to “Promising”.  This year, ACTEK and Westport Software (now Enterprise Incentive Software) did not meet the inclusion criterion for signing new customers.  There is also a new name on the list - ZS Associates.

I asked Gartner if I could share their ICM Vendor Matrix on this blog, but they refused.  However, I collected the related press releases:

I did not find publicly available information regarding Xactly, ZS Associates and SAP’s ranking.

The rating is based on overall viability, customer experience, products and services, market responsiveness, track record and geographic strategy.  Gartner’s definition for a positive rating is “Demonstrate strength in specific areas, but execution in one or more areas may still be developing or inconsistent with other areas of performance”.  A promising rating is defined as “Shows potential in specific areas; however, execution is inconsistent”.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Insurance Incentive Compensation Management Applications
Enterprise Incentive Management News

Incentive Compensation Industry News

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Callidus Software Reports Preliminary Financial Results for the Second Quarter 2008

  • Subscription and support revenues for the second quarter are expected to be approximately $10.0 million, an increase of 68% over the second quarter of 2007.
  • Callidus On-Demand (subscription) gross margins for the second quarter are expected to be within the range of 45 to 50%, up from 22% in Q1 2008.

WageWorks Selects Centive Compel(R) to Automate Sales Compensation Management

Centive, the leader in on-demandsolutions for sales compensation and sales performance management, todayannounced that WageWorks, the leading provider of tax-advantaged benefitsprograms, has selected Centive Compel to automate sales compensation and drivesales performance. Here is another related article.

Xactly Named World’s Best New Company by 2008 International Business Awards(SM)

Xactly Corporation took home theprestigious International Stevie(R) Award in The 2008 International BusinessAwards.

Sales Resource Group’s PlanIt solution earns finalist award at 2008 International Business Awards and for for Microsoft Bluesky Finalist.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
In the News this Week…
Callidus Software Acquires ActekSoft