Vue Software

Tag Archive for 'Challenges'

Quality versus Quantity: Aligning Sales Incentives with Profitability (Part 3)

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Data Rules

Clear, timely reporting remains the greatest hurdle to using profitability in the sales incentive plan. For the measure to be effective, sales people and managers must understand what drivers of profitability need focus with a degree of frequency that aligns with the sales cycle. Most challenging are sales environments with a high-transaction frequency, significant disparity in profitability across those transactions, and use of channel partners in the sale and distribution of the product.

There are a number of software applications for financial reporting and analytics; check for those prominent in your industry, and ensure targeted vendors have met the requirements of companies similar to yours. From a sales perspective, the best applications are those delivering only the needed information at a given time. The last thing you want your sales people doing is poring over lengthy reports, instead of selling.

Many times when auditing metrics and goal effectiveness we discover management and sales people simply don’t use the data, either because they think its not accurate or it doesn’t pertain to current priorities. Data accuracy has a number of root causes. For purposes of sales motivation and incentives, your quality metric is dead on arrival if there is widespread perception or poor data quality. Therefore, test the metric’s reporting accuracy thoroughly before applying to incentives. A good rule of thumb is the number of items requiring correction should not exceed one percent of the total data set – e.g., no more than 1 of every 100 goal-achievement scores in that month’s performance period requires adjustment due to erroneous data.

To help ensure sales management and reps actually use the reports (once accurate), include sales management in the process for defining reporting requirements, configuring the reporting interface, and other user-centric components. Once you are reporting the metric to the field, research and showcase best-in-class usage, using day-in-the-life examples and statistics on time savings. Appoint sales managers as technology champions to fully understand the application’s benefits, and espouse these benefits to the larger sales population. Monitor usage, and have in place close-loop process to address unintended consequences.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Sales Incentives and Profitability Key Points
Quality versus Quantity: Aligning Sales Incentives with Profitability (Part 4)

2009 Sales Compensation Trends Survey

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

I recently talked about a few salary and incentive compensation surveys, but here is another one from the Alexander Group that focuses on Sales Compensation.

The 2009 Sales Compensation Trends Survey found that 40.34% of the 180 participating companies use a desktop solution such as a spread sheet or data base and that 29% use a custom in-house solution to administer their sales compensation program. Outside solutions represent 27.27% of the respondents: Custom Purchase (9.66%), ERP/Data Base Component (5.68%), Dedicated Commercial Hosted Solution (5.68%), Dedicated Commercial Enterprise Package (4.55%), and Outsourced to a Third Party (1.7%). The remaining participants selected “Other” (3.41%).

The survey included many large companies like American Express, Microsoft, General Electric, DuPont, and Kraft Foods, but it also included many smaller companies with only 20 sales personnel (or more). I think that this is why 40% of the companies surveyed still use a spreadsheet / desktop solution.

What I think is particularly interesting is to compare the on-demand and on-premise solution usage; 5.68% of the companies used an on-demand solution, while 4.55% of the companies used an on-premise solution. In other words, only about 10% of the respondents use a dedicated commercial sales performance management solution. Over the next few years, I believe we will see many of the companies moving away from spreadsheets or custom solutions to move to a commercial application.

I’m also very curious about what “Other” solutions 3.41% of the respondents are using… hand-written incentive compensation statements? I’m assuming that these companies probably use some sort of application to manage this; maybe a payroll system or a talent management application with an incentive compensation module.

The survey also provides several other interesting results:

  • 3.0% was the average incentive payout increase in 2008.
  • 4.4% is the average incentive pay increase planned for 2009.
  • 5.6% is the expected median revenue growth for 2009; 6.0% occurred in 2008.
  • 30.72% will increase staff in 2009; 44.69% will not change staffing levels; 24.58% expect a decline.
  • 93.44% of the reporting companies will make changes to the 2009 sales compensation plan.
  • 53.30% made some type of mid-year change to their sales compensation plan design in 2008.
  • 78.14% of all companies use sales revenue as the primary performance measure.
  • 55.19% say correct goal setting is the toughest part of sales compensation.
  • 32.95% say the sales department is solely responsible for the sales compensation plan design.
  • 90.0% was the median of the average quota performance reported in 2008.
  • 45.39% of all companies made some mid-year quota changes during 2008.

I discussed how many organizations reacted to a recession by adjusting their sales compensation plans, but these results help back up this claim. About 50% of the respondents adjusted their compensation plan design and quota values during 2008, and more than 93% are planning to modify their plan for 2009!

As a side note, I recently contributed to the creation of OpenSymmetry’s Sales Performance Management survey, which will provide more insight about comp plan administration, SPM solutions, and challenges. Let me know if you would like to participate and I will let you know when it’s ready.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Sales Comp Administration Practices Survey
Survey on Sales Quota

ICM Implementation Offshoring Pros and Cons

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Projects can be partially or completely outsourced. The outsourcing can be done partially or entirely offshore. The most common scenario I usually encounter is when a company outsources a project to a consulting company. The consulting team usually works on-site, and often have several resources located offshore. There seems to be a trend for consultant who used to work on-site, to be allowed to work remotely.

As I pointed out, many EIM/SPM solution vendors and consulting companies will discuss the benefits which can be achieved by outsourcing parts of an Incentive Compensation Management implementation. I agree with these benefits, but there are also many challenges which must be carefully managed to be successful.
Working with an offshore team through a consulting company reduces a lot of the risk; you don’t have to worry about contracts, quality, infrastructure, intellectual properties, etc. Furthermore, consulting companies usually have a good relationship with their offshore arm.

Setting aside all ethical and macro-economics discussions about offshoring, here are some of the main pros and cons.

Main offshoring benefits:
Labor: Skilled labor can be very expensive, but it can especially be very difficult to find. Even a large consulting company may have problems finding an available consultant with the right skill set.
Cost: Offshore locations are usually developing countries where labor is significantly cheaper.
Speed: When a project is well managed, more people usually mean a more aggressive schedule.
Work 24/7: For North-American people, working with a country such as India makes it “easy” to work around the clock.
Some of the challenges to be managed
Communication and language barriers: Most of us have some experience working with team members who are located somewhere else, and have faced communication challenges related to this. Offshoring brings another layer to the communication challenges, a topic to which I will dedicate another article.
Coordination: Because of all the communication challenges, complex coordination activities become even more complex.
Cultures: Each culture have their own principles and values. Not being mindful of cultural differences can lead to big problems.

Cost: Savings could be only marginal, especially with rising labor costs in some countries (especially in India)

Quality: This is a challenge for on-site and offshore team alike. Offshore teams are usually very good at achieving very high quality standards. However, quality is still perceived as a higher risk with offshore teams.

Security: Quality is another concern most companies have, especially when dealing with confidential employment information. There are very secure mechanisms to collaborate, even across continents, but security is a topic which requires particular attention.

Key to Success

In my opinion, the key to successfully leveraging an offshore team is in:

  • Having a good manager and team leads experienced with offshore projects
  • Having A good [formalized] communication strategy, “hand-off” mechanism between onshore and offshore teams and processes in place
  • Having a good understanding of which project components can be tackled “at night” by the offshore team and handed to the onshore team “in the morning”, and vice-versa.

Tags: , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Outsourcing and Offshoring your SPM Implementation
Group Competition Incentive Pros and Cons