Vue Software

Tag Archive for 'Donya Rose'

Quota Performance Distribution

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (3 votes, average: 3.67 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Last week I wrote that the percentage of reps making quota in 2009 dropped to 51.8% from 58.8% in 2008, according to a large survey. One of my readers made the comment that it would be interesting to find out how many companies expect/want their sales people to make quota.

I reached out to two experts in the incentive compensation field to get their opinion.

Donya Rose from the Cygnal Group replied on her blog that ‘most people should achieve or exceed quota’. More specifically, she says, more than half of the people should hit or exceed their goal.   She notes that the ideal performance distribution should be as follows:

  • Not more than 5% of the sales people “out of the money” (earning no variable pay), and the these people should generally not be “keepers”
  • About 40% of the sales people earning some variable pay, but less than the target amount
  • About 45% of the sales people earning more than the target amount, but less than the fully leveraged upside (fully leveraged upside is generally 2 to 3 times the target incentive)
  • About 10% of the sales people earning the fully leveraged upside or more.

So the 51.8% of people making quota in 2008 is low, but still acceptable according to Donya’s point of view.

I also asked the question to David Cichelli from the Alexander Group. His answer was that companies should shoot for 65 to 70 percent of all sales people to achieve quota. He notes that this performance distribution should create an on-goal performance of at least 100% of company sales goal. Through their own survey, the Alexander Group also noticed a significant reduction in quota attainment in 2009, with a median quota performance of 85%… a historically low number.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Setting Sales Quotas
A small sovereign city-state located in South Western Europe on the northern central coast of the Mediterranean Sea

Common Pitfalls in Sales Compensation Design

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Today I attended the “Common Pitfalls in Sales Compensation Design” webinar, hosted by Makana Solutions, featuring guest speaker Donya Rose, Founding Partner of the Cygnal Group, a sales compensation consulting company.

I did not manage to get the audio working (the toll-free number was only for Americans and the International number was out-of-service). However I will quickly recap the major pitfalls identified, based on the presentation deck.
Pitfall 1: Sales Credit Wars
Symptom: Time is spent fighting over who is supposed to get credit
Cause: Lack of documentation, rules not formalized
Cost: Lost sales, management distraction, potentially double crediting, morale issues
Solution: Document the policies and credit-sharing criteria
My comment: Another cost which must be considered is the waste of time for the comp team trying to resolve issues and conflicts. In large organizations this can be a huge time burden. However it is generally fairly easy to minimize this situation by having well established rules.

Pitfall 2: Too many Measures
Symptom: Sales people ignore some of the required results and only focus on what makes them earn the biggest commission
Cause: Too many measures…
Cost: Lack of focus, compensation hard relate to actual results
Solution: Only use a few measures.
My Comment: This is a topic I addressed a few times on this blog. Consultants generally agree that there should be no more than 3 independent measures.
Pitfall 3: Commissions Rates only go up
Symptom: Sales people can earn too much money compared to the value they bring
Cause: Commission rates are related to the level of sales even if those sales are attributable to windfalls.
Cost: Comp cost is not in line with sales contribution
Solution: The commission rate should diminish passed a certain performance level
My Comment: A “regressive” commission can protect against an unexpected windfall, but can also avoid an excessive payout caused by a quota set too low.
I often see different rules, formulas and quotas used for orders exceeding a certain mount to avoid a windfall scenario.
Pitfall 4: Extraordinary Performance is Over-Rewarded
Symptom: Dependence on over-achiever sales people
Cause: Over-performance is too attractive to sales people
Cost: Sales people developed entitlement and demanding attitude, more risks
Solution: Use appropriate deceleration in commission rates
My Comment: Deceleration does not necessarily needs to be applied as soon as the initial target is reached. I have often seen cases where the rate increased once the target was reached, and decelerated after another performance level was attained.
Pitfall 5: Unattainable Goals
Symptom: Sales people give-up because goals are too high
Cause: Goal setting issue
Cost: Lack of motivation and engagement, results below expectations
Solution: Set goals appropriately
My Comment: Goal setting should be based on historical data if possible to be “just right”. Making goals too easy to attain can lead to other problems such as a lack of motivation to exceed goals if rate decreases after, or an excessive commission payout.
Pitfall 6: “Phantom Base”
Symptom: Sales People whose salary largely depends on commissions act like they are salaried and under-achieve.
Cause: Compensation plans that pay too much for prior-year sales
Cost: Sub-optimal level of performance, losing account acquisition and penetration skills
Solution: Pay more for new business and less for prior-year sales
Pitfall 7: First Dollar Commission + Base
Symptom: Sales people are too comfortable with below-target earnings
Cause: Sales people are paid a significant base salary and earn commission on sales from first dollar
Cost: Income+Commission too high for actual productivity
Solution: Only pay commission after a threshold level of sales is achieved
My Comment: Other alternatives are possible to fix this situation. The entire compensation mix could be re-evaluated and the base salary could be lowered. It would also be possible to adjust the commission rate before a threshold to minimize the impact of removing commission completely before a certain threshold.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
In the News this Week…
Don’t Automate Chaos