Vue Software

Tag Archive for 'economy'

Salespeople Struggle With Bonus Targets In Downturn… And Technology Hurdles

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Yet another post about the impact of the ‘Downturn’ on Incentive Compensation, but this one is special. Check out my quote in the Workforce Magazine if you haven’t seen it already.

The gist of the article is that when external forces such as the economy are having some fun, companies must react and adapt… And in the world if incentive compensation, especially for the large enterprise, this does not only mean strategy changes but also software changes.

Many executives don’t think that such IT changes can be difficult… And often it’s true. But sometimes changes can be easy, but time consuming. Other times changes should be easy, but can’t be done because incentive calculations are done on a 40 year old mainframe system using COBOL and Focus databases and no one remembers exactly which digit in the 2000 character string called SFSHJHE represents the rate. This is just another reminder of the importance of having a ‘flexible’ compensation system.

Tags: , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Woohoo! Some companies are starting to get it!
Can Performance be Measured?

Quality versus Quantity: Aligning Sales Incentives with Profitability (Part 2)

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Even if market practice for a job suggests metrics that are exclusively growth oriented (e.g., revenue), many industries and jobs are or will have to shift the focus away from growth and toward profitability because of the economy. So with a look-forward perspective, you need to address: how does each job influence profitability? In general, influencers or drivers of profitability for sales roles fall into one of the following four categories:

  • Revenue through product preference or price protection
  • Cost containment
  • Risk mitigation
  • Strategic influences; e.g., business growth, customer service, cross sell, efficiency (e.g., utilization of CIS)

Revenue drivers apply when sellers have autonomy over pricing or product positioning. To motivate performance in this area, management can include gross margin or product-specific quotas into the plan, keeping in mind that in transactional selling environments, sellers can increase today’s margins at the expense of longer terms growth. One way to achieve a balance between short- and longer-term measures in the incentive plan is to link the product or gross margin goal attainment score with that of overall revenue (through a matrix, for example).

Cost containment is not typically a function of transactional sellers, though selling supervisors and relationship managers of large, complex accounts might have impact over the use of company resources (e.g., support personnel), T&E, freight and other deal-specific variables that count as expense. Stay clear of operating or allocated costs over which the job has no influence. Inclusion of such “fixed” costs adds complexity to the incentive scheme.

Risk mitigation includes adjustments for factors that could influence longer-term profitability. Examples include customer viability, third-party partner involvement and cost of capital. More risky industries typically use risk departments to assess the degree of risk inherent in each deal, thus freeing the sales function to focus on bringing deals to the table (a balance of power, so to speak). While sales people are often in a unique position to assess certain risk factors, their inherent motivation is to find ways to make the deal happen, not prevent it. The wiser choice is to use other mechanisms, including senior leadership review, to mitigate risk.

Strategic drivers include indirect factors that contribute to efficiency, customer loyalty, price protection and other, likely contributors to profitability. Measures such as cross sell, customer penetration (percent of wallet) and customer satisfaction fall into this category. Remember these are indirect factors. More efficient sales people aren’t necessarily more productive; happy customers aren’t necessarily loyal customers, especially those with low price elasticity.

Some industries, such as retail, use customer satisfaction as a key competitive differentiator. In such industries, motivating employees to delight customers is mission critical. It’s not upside, not bonus. These are table stakes, and in the total rewards framework, compensated through base salary. Those employees going above and beyond should receive special recognition.

Putting pay at risk, through the incentive plan, for strategic items is probably not effective unless there are meaningful dollars at stake (>20% of base salary). Otherwise, sales people dismiss these goals as not important, and focus on what will make a difference to their pay. Getting sales people to focus on drivers of efficiency, penetration and customer loyalty requires drum banging from all levels of the organization, from the CEO down to the line supervisor. Everyone, leadership especially, must walk the talk. Only when you have such continuity and unwavering organizational commitment can you expect the sales force to focus and make progress here.

Strategic drivers can be more difficult to track and report. Cross-selling is often self-reported, customer satisfaction a subjective and cost-intensive exercise. Employees have to believe the data and be able to see the connection between their actions and the company’s objectives. Otherwise, they’re not motivated (at best) or, if there’s pay at risk, upset.

As the figure below suggests, you are more likely to get results by introducing measures over which the sales people believe they have meaningful light of sight. Your best chance at increasing sales person focus on drivers of profitability is to emphasize through goals and incentive opportunity factors they currently, or perceive they can, influence.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Sales Incentives and Profitability Key Points
Quality versus Quantity: Aligning Sales Incentives with Profitability (Part 3)

Setting Sales Quotas

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 3.5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Sales quota are tricky to set because they can be affected by so many factors (and as we’ve seen yesterday, by the economy).  After all, how can we really predict how much our sales force will sell before the start of the fiscal year!  In most cases, quotas are set based on last year’s performance, growth forecasts, industry trends, and by what your competitors are doing. In the end, most of the companies have to adjust quotas mid-year to ensure that people don’t get demotivated if a majority does not reach their quota, and that the company does not go bankrupt if too many people exceed their quota.

The main problem with setting quotas based on last year’s performance is that sometimes, our predictions are not accurate…  And that’s why we need an easy way to manage these quotas, and to get the ‘big picture’ on how our sales force is performing.

Tags: , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Percentage of reps making quota in 2009 dropped to 51.8% from 58.8% in 2008
Survey on Sales Quota

8 Predictions for the Incentive Compensation Industry in 2009

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

It’s the time of the year where everyone makes their predictions for 2009.  With all the economic turmoil of 2008, 2009 should be an interesting year for sales performance management.

Last year I mentioned that I believed 2008 would see a surge in demand for the on-demand market.  Checked!  We’ve seen many companies entering this space with new on-demand solutions and many vendors shifting their focus from an on-premise to an on-demand strategy.

Now I have a few thoughts about where I think the market will be heading in 2009…

1)    On-Demand still going strong – Some people believe the on-demand wave will slow down.   I don’t think this will apply much to Sales Performance Management.  With many budget cuts/freezes, enterprises across the world are more reluctant to make any large IT investments before they can see a positive move in the economy.  Since I believe the economy will take several months before it recovers, I think these companies will be more likely to have a closer look at on-demand solutions.

2)     Hybrid SPM Solutions – This may take a while before it comes…  With the SPM vendors (as every other company) concerned about surviving/striving in a tough economy, R&D budgets may suffer.  But at some point, I’m sure we’ll see many SaaS solutions which can be accessed off-line.  In other words, the SPM solution, sitting on someone’s laptop, could be synchronized with the on-demand server and then used without an internet connection.    I’m also hoping that configuration could happen while being “offline”.

3)    More Customer Focus – With an increasing number of excellent SPM solutions available, one of the key factors in getting new customers and retaining old ones will be customer focus.

4)    Death (and birth) of Acronyms – Incentive compensation is a booming niche market and it should be no surprise that new lingo and new acronyms are “invented daily”.  Some of the terminology will stick, some of it will become less popular and die.  For example, I believe that ICM (Incentive Compensation Management) and EIM (Enterprise Incentive Management) will slowly disappear and be replaced by SPM (Sales Performance Management) – even if they are not the same thing.  On-premise and On-demand might stick and replace more technical lingo like SaaS (Software-as-a-Service).  Others may never catch on (like trying to replace “on-demand” by “the cloud”).

5)    Revamp of compensation plans – Many companies will choose to revisit their old compensation plans and either tweak them or re-design them.  I think that vendors and consulting companies will have more implementation revenues from existing solutions compared to previous years.

6)    Surge of boutique consulting firms – Two points here;  with many people being “let go” from SPM vendors, I’m sure many will decide to try starting their own company or become independent consultants.  Also, with companies becoming more cost conscious, they will consider boutique firms as implementation partners, instead of only considering large IT shops (Accenture, Deloitte, etc).

7)    Importance of the balance sheets – Companies choosing a new SPM solution or an implementation partner will pay even more attention to the companies’ balance sheets.  The technology will still be important, so will the experience, but a deal breaker will be the financial viability of the vendor/partner being considered.

8)    Open Source Solutions – This could be a stretch, but with many people with the right skill set finding themselves without a job, we may be seeing some open-source SPM solutions emerging.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Setting Sales Quotas
The Surge of On-Demand (SaaS) Incentive Applications