Vue Software

Tag Archive for 'Mark Smith'

Ventana Research Sales Performance Management Value Index

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (4 votes, average: 3.75 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Ventana Research recently released their Sales Performance Management Value Index 2009 research paper which benchmarks four leading SPM solution suppliers and their solutions.

Unlike the Gartner SPM report which I have discussed a few times, the Ventana Value Index evaluates how well vendors’ offerings meet buyers’ requirements for software that enables and supports Sales Performance Management. The Index evaluates the software in the context of seven key categories: adaptability, manageability, reliability, usability, functionality, total cost of ownership, and return on investment.

You can jump on their website to download the executive summary after a quick registration.

The research notes that there are 5 vendors providing solutions across the sales performance management spectrum: Callidus Software, Merced Systems, Synygy, Varicent Software and Xactly Corporation. The other solution providers were out of the scope because their offerings are too broad (focus on CRM and Sales Force Automation) or too specific (focus on only a certain area of SPM or on a specific industry).

As expected, after compiling the weighted scores for each category, the value index difference is within 1% for the top 3 vendors (Callidus, Varicent and Merced), with Xactly lagging only a few percents behind. Most categories yielded very close results, with the largest (but still small) gaps in the capability and validation categories.

These results are not extremely surprising since the research focused on how well the SPM offerings met the buyers’ requirements, and since most SPM solutions offer very similar core functionality. However, this doesn’t mean that there are no significant differences in how, or how well the solutions handle various SPM requirements.

As for Synygy, some things could be inferred from a company concerned to be benchmarked against competitors by an independent research firm.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Align, Optimize and Understand
Callidus Software Launches Executive Briefing Series, “Survive and Thrive: Secrets to Selling More

Align, Optimize and Understand

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

The second speaker at the Callidus Survive and Thrive event was Mark Smith, the CEO of Ventana Research. The key message of Mark’s presentation was that to be successful in performance management, it is necessary to focus on aligning, optimizing and understanding people, processes and information.

The Ventana Performance Cycle

Align – To align the business, you must be able to coordinate and drive individual actions based on information and performance targets. This should provide the ability to leverage historical internal and external benchmarks as a reference for driving change in an organization. This should leverage personalized information that can also be continuously monitored. This provides the ability for goal setting, scoring, notifying and automating the performance management process.

Optimize – To optimize the business, you must enable automated and manual methods to collaborate and share knowledge on information and apply analytics for performance improvement. This provides the ability to employ sophisticated models and algorithms for creating forecasts and plans that can simply or dramatically change the organization. This provides the ability to forecast, collaborate, integrate, and act on information.

Understand - To understand the business, a business model that represents the activities and processes of the organization must be created. This provides the ability to measure the historical context of the organization through quantitative and qualitative information. This provides the baseline information through a set of sub-steps - model, access, discover, and interact with information.

Through a survey, Ventana Research found out that the key area of concern for business executives was the ‘Align’ area, followed by the ‘Optimize’ area.

This presentation really resonated with me because I also believe that in the Sales Performance Management field, we often spend too much time focusing on the technology (the SPM solution, the integration of the system, etc), without looking at the big picture and also considering the ‘people’ and processes’ elements. Companies looking for an SPM solution, are often looking for a silver-bullet solution that will solve all their problems. If you read the SPM suppliers’ website, you realize that it is not a wonder that companies believe these solutions will solve all their problems… but the IT solution is often only the tip of the iceberg.

On Saturday I passed my ITIL V3 certification (ITIL is a framework for IT Service Management) and it essentially reinforced the idea that an IT solution should only be considered as a component of the end-to-end variable compensation ‘service’, and that we need to put a greater focus on the business goals. Elliot Ross has many great articles about ‘people problems’, ‘process problems’, and ITIL strategy here.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Webinar: Demystifying the Complexity of Sales Performance Management – Business vs Technology
An Incentive Compensation Management Solution won’t Solve all your Problems…

The Haunted Winchester Mystery House

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (6 votes, average: 4.17 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

I spent last Thursday in sunny California (it probably ended up being a bit colder there than in Ottawa), to attend the Callidus Survive and Thrive: Secrets to Selling More Executive Briefing Series. I had the chance to finally meet Jason Angelos from Accenture and Mark Smith, CEO of Ventana Research in person, as well as Steve Apfelberg, Jock Breitwieser and several other people from Callidus Software I only knew virtually.

Jason’s presentation about trends in Performance Management, factors driving motivation, and best practices was very similar to the webinar I covered here. I’ll let you read that post if you want to refresh your memory Accenture’s point of view on what are the 3 factors driving behavior (Ability, Motivation and Context) and what are the levers to achieve performance objectives.

But this time, Jason started his presentation with a story about the Winchester Mystery House.

Here are a few facts about this Winchester Mystery House:

  • The mansion is located in San Jose, California
  • It took 38 years and $5.5 million dollars to build it (construction stopped in 1922)
  • The house has 160 rooms, 24,000 square foot, 10,000 windows, 2,000 doors, 6 kitchens, 40 bedrooms, 13 bathrooms, 47 fireplaces…
  • 149 builders were involved in its construction
  • No architect were involved and 0 blueprints or master plan were ever created
  • 65 of the house’s doors lead to blank walls
  • 13 staircases lead nowhere
  • 24 skylights are covered by floors

That sounds just like a large scale incentive compensation implementation; the implementation is broken down in many phases with a scope more or less defined, many contractors are involved on the project over its lifecycle, development is often an ongoing effort, the number of components involved often becomes very large and the project can be more complex than anyone had foreseen.

To avoid making a Winchester Mystery house of your implementation, we should learn that we need to plan very carefully before implementing any large scale project. You don’t want your SPM implementation to have ‘staircases’ going nowhere and ‘doors’ leading to blank walls. And you especially don’t want to become an ‘attraction’ for other companies to visit only to see how ‘messed-up’ your implementation is!

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Implementation: In-House development versus Hiring Consultants/Outsourcing
Commission, Bonus or Entitlement?