Compensation Plan Design

Tag Archive for 'Multi-Tenant'

A small sovereign city-state located in South Western Europe on the northern central coast of the Mediterranean Sea

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

What is Monaco?

Bingo!

But Monaco is also the name of Callidus’ latest on-demand offering. The only problem is that they haven’t done a very good job at advertising it – which is one of the reasons why I’m receiving many questions on this topic.

The press release about Monaco came out a few months ago but faded quickly. It describes Callidus Monaco as:

A robust, SaaS offering that delivers the most modern-looking and rich user interface experience available in the sales performance management marketplace today. The Callidus Monaco Suite is the only unified SPM software solution that provides complete alignment of the entire business with corporate objectives to optimize performance, streamline profitability and deliver a rapid ROI.

…Yet another “only unified SPM software solution”. That press release also mentions that the solution is a multi-tenant SPM offering which streamlines:
• Objective Management
• Quota Management
• Reporting and Analytics
• Compensation Calculation
• Embedded Workflow
• Plan Distribution

After reading this, I was wondering if Callidus Monaco was only a rebranding of the Callidus On-Demand SPM, a new solution that would be replacing it eventually, another offering that would be available in parallel, the same solution but ‘multi-tenant’…?

What I found out is that Monaco is a combination of many existing on-demand offerings, focused on SMBs. For example, the Objective Management and Quota Management features are offered through TrueMBO and TrueQuota which I reviewed here. TrueMBO and TrueQuota can be purchased as standalone applications, but they are also unified with the core ‘Monaco’ product which is similar to TrueComp with a Web 2.0 facelift and more basic templates available out of the box.

Callidus Monaco will be offered in parallel to Callidus SPM On-Demand.  Callidus On-Demand will be  limited to customers in specific industries such as Insurance.  All other customers wanting to use an On-Demand solution from Callidus will be offered Monaco.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Valentine’s Day in Prison
Crappy Incentive Plan

Buy the Car, Rent the Car or Take the Bus

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (4 votes, average: 4 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

I found an interesting comment on LinkedIn from Chris Collins regarding the difference between On-Premise, On-Demand (Single-Tenant) and On-Demand (Multi-Tenant).  This is not the first time I hear or use the car rental versus car buying analogy, but I think it is well explained and I enjoyed the ‘bus’ example:

Here is one analogy that I use to demonstrate the concept of SaaS to non-technical audiences that always seems to get them understanding the basic idea. I tell them to imagine 2 cars and a bus.

BUY THE CAR: The first car they buy and pay for outright. They are responsible for all maintenance, insurance, gas. This is analagous to buying the hardware and traditionally licensing the software yourself in house. You as the buyer are very interested in the technology you are getting.

RENT THE CAR: The second car they rent by the month. You don’t own the car but you have some say over where the car goes and you are still somewhat interested in the technology. When you go the rental car parking lot, you have a choice of cars and your decision of which car to choose is somewhat based on technology. Also, one person rents one car. This is somewhat analagous to a traditional ASP model. The point is someone else might own it, but you are still interested in the technology underlying it.

TAKE THE BUS: The bus is multi-tenant. When the transmission (platform) is changed on the bus, every tenant is affected because they are riding on the same platform. BUT when you take the bus, unlike when you buy or rent a car, you are not as interested in the underlying technology but in what the bus can do for you. You are now looking primarily at the service aspect, what need can it fulfill for you? If you need to go to the mall and a bus arrives whose ticker says “Mall” on its route, then you take it for that reason, not because of the the transmission on the bus. You only pay for the cost to get to the mall, not by month or not the full cost of the bus.

However you can take the analogy a little further. If you are transporting precious cargo on the bus, you will of course want to make sure the bus is safe from hijackers while stopped and in transport just the same way customers still want to be sure their precious data is protected. If there is a particular transmission type that that is known to have holes in it and cargo sometimes falls out, the customer will want to know about that upfront.Then you risk losing the customer’s focus on the service and put it back on the technology. That is a very important concept.

Do you think this applies to a Sales Performance Management solution licensing model decision?

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Commission, Bonus or Entitlement?