Vue Software

Tag Archive for 'On-demand'

2009 Sales Compensation Trends Survey

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

I recently talked about a few salary and incentive compensation surveys, but here is another one from the Alexander Group that focuses on Sales Compensation.

The 2009 Sales Compensation Trends Survey found that 40.34% of the 180 participating companies use a desktop solution such as a spread sheet or data base and that 29% use a custom in-house solution to administer their sales compensation program. Outside solutions represent 27.27% of the respondents: Custom Purchase (9.66%), ERP/Data Base Component (5.68%), Dedicated Commercial Hosted Solution (5.68%), Dedicated Commercial Enterprise Package (4.55%), and Outsourced to a Third Party (1.7%). The remaining participants selected “Other” (3.41%).

The survey included many large companies like American Express, Microsoft, General Electric, DuPont, and Kraft Foods, but it also included many smaller companies with only 20 sales personnel (or more). I think that this is why 40% of the companies surveyed still use a spreadsheet / desktop solution.

What I think is particularly interesting is to compare the on-demand and on-premise solution usage; 5.68% of the companies used an on-demand solution, while 4.55% of the companies used an on-premise solution. In other words, only about 10% of the respondents use a dedicated commercial sales performance management solution. Over the next few years, I believe we will see many of the companies moving away from spreadsheets or custom solutions to move to a commercial application.

I’m also very curious about what “Other” solutions 3.41% of the respondents are using… hand-written incentive compensation statements? I’m assuming that these companies probably use some sort of application to manage this; maybe a payroll system or a talent management application with an incentive compensation module.

The survey also provides several other interesting results:

  • 3.0% was the average incentive payout increase in 2008.
  • 4.4% is the average incentive pay increase planned for 2009.
  • 5.6% is the expected median revenue growth for 2009; 6.0% occurred in 2008.
  • 30.72% will increase staff in 2009; 44.69% will not change staffing levels; 24.58% expect a decline.
  • 93.44% of the reporting companies will make changes to the 2009 sales compensation plan.
  • 53.30% made some type of mid-year change to their sales compensation plan design in 2008.
  • 78.14% of all companies use sales revenue as the primary performance measure.
  • 55.19% say correct goal setting is the toughest part of sales compensation.
  • 32.95% say the sales department is solely responsible for the sales compensation plan design.
  • 90.0% was the median of the average quota performance reported in 2008.
  • 45.39% of all companies made some mid-year quota changes during 2008.

I discussed how many organizations reacted to a recession by adjusting their sales compensation plans, but these results help back up this claim. About 50% of the respondents adjusted their compensation plan design and quota values during 2008, and more than 93% are planning to modify their plan for 2009!

As a side note, I recently contributed to the creation of OpenSymmetry’s Sales Performance Management survey, which will provide more insight about comp plan administration, SPM solutions, and challenges. Let me know if you would like to participate and I will let you know when it’s ready.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Sales Comp Administration Practices Survey
Survey on Sales Quota

On-Demand vs On-Premise vs Hosted SPM Solutions; pros and cons

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

The problem with most on-demand versus on-premise SPM solution analysis is that they tend to be biased. The reason for that is that many the sources of those comparisons are the software vendors. A vendor with a SaaS solution will try to convince customers that SaaS is better than on-premise, and vice-versa.

So which model is most appropriate? The reality is that it varies on a case by case basis. A quick search for this comparison, at least in the CRM space, will display thousands of results which can be useful to make up y our mind.

On-Demand Pros

Convenience: The application can be accessed from anywhere… You can administer it from home, while on the road, etc. Your reps can also access their dashboards and performance from anywhere in the world.  It also means that the implementation team should be able to work remotely more easily, which will reduce the implementation expenses.
Worry-Free: No need to worry about the technical support of the application, applying patches, etc.
Focus on core business: No IT infrastructure to maintain in-house… you get to focus on what you do and not on keeping a system up and running.  You also don’t need to invest in expensive hardware.
Pricing Model: Avoiding a large up-front cost will allow to try an application without spending too much up-front. After a certain period of time it may be more expensive than purchasing a license, but looking at the total cost of ownership it may still be a viable option.

On-Demand Cons

Security: Valuable and usually very confidential business data resides with a third party company. SPM companies are making a big effort to keep this information “safe”, and that’s why most vendors are SAS 70 certified… but it’s still a valid concern for many companies.
Uptime: As discussed yesterday, uptime of SaaS solutions is usually pretty good, but one never knows when there can be a problem…  It’s happened to me more than once to work on an on-demand project where I was counting on a Friday night to finish up important implementation activities only to hit a maintenance window where the system was not available for a few hours.
Monthly cost: After a few years, the monthly cost of a SaaS solution may end up higher than it would have been by having purchased a license.
Flexibility: Can an on-demand really handle your compensation plans? Some will, some may not… but this is often a “gotcha”, particularly for companies with complex data integration requirements.

On-Premise Pros

Flexibility: On-premise solutions typically have an open databases, the technology stack is usually more flexible, and the configuration itself is usually also more flexible.
Hands-on control: Control over the maintenance windows, issue resolution, security, data, when patches are applied, etc.
Frequent upgrades:
Application updates are frequent and automatic.
Disaster recovery: SaaS companies will have a process in place to keep your data safe and redundant systems may allow the system to keep running even if the primary service crashes.

On-Premise Cons

Upfront Cost: The upfront cost is high, but the total cost of ownership might be a different story, depending on current technological capacity and existing infrastructure.
Implementation time:
It usually takes longer to implement an on-premise solution; not necessarily because they are on-premise, but mostly because many customers choosing the on-premise model have very complex requirements
IT expertise: On-premise systems require to have IT experts in-house.
Patches and upgrades: I mentioned automatic upgrades as a key benefit of an on-demand solution, so it should not be a surprise to find this here. However, what should be added is that most on-premise SPM vendors will only support their current and previous release. With major releases usually coming out every year, be ready to upgrade to a new version every 2 year!

Hosted:

On-demand is technically hosted, but many companies offer the option to buy a license as you would with an on-premise solution, but will host it for you. This is really identical to the on-demand model, except that the cost structure is different (upfront cost instead of an on-going monthly cost).  Not every vendor offer this option, but if they do, it could be worth considering if you are looking for the pros of an on-demand solution with the pricing model of an on-premise solution.

What are others doing?
Many people are using both types of solutions and as I mentioned, it’s a decision that must be made on a case by case basis. It looks like there is a trend towards adopting on-demand solutions. It should be no surprise that many vendors try to push their on-demand offerings since that in the long-term, it usually means more money for them.

Before making a decision about which of the SaaS or on-demand model is the right decision, THE big question is, can the on-demand solution handle your compensation plans, transaction volume and data integration requirements? If it can, the decision is really up to your cost break-even analysis and how you evaluate the other pros and cons of each model.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
When do you need Compensation Management Software?
LeapComp featured in Arcadia Solutions’ Q3 Newsletter

Adoption of Software-as-a-Service in the Sales Performance Management (SPM) Industry

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

A question many of my clients wonder about is “should we get an on-demand Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) SPM solution, or an on-premise solution.” The popularity of SaaS solutions and of traditionally on-premise solution being offered on-demand surged last year. I will discuss the pros and cons of each model in more details in a separate post; for now I will focus on one of the biggest concern to adopt SaaS.

Availability and Control. Let’s define availability as the “up time” of the SPM application. In other words, high availability means that an application will be continuously operational for a long period of time. If the application is not available, no one can access it. What is the impact of such “down time”? If the outage is “only” affecting the sales reps that can no longer access their performance for a few hours, availability may not be such an issue. If you are in the implementation process, it is clear that an outage would paralyze the implementation efforts for that time (let’s hope that it’s not during deployment!). In the worst case, the outage could happen around the time the incentive compensation needs to be processed and submitted to payroll (ouch!).

Technology is not perfect, and we can expect it to fail once in a while. But what makes many companies think twice about adopting a mission critical SaaS solution is that they lose control any potential issues and over how quickly they can get resolved.

Let’s look at a recent example outside of Incentive Compensation. Last Tuesday, the web was buzzing with news about Salesforce.com being down. A network device failed, and the redundant systems did not kick in for some reason. This stopped all data from being processed in Japan, Europe, and North America. Why is this a big deal? Because SalesForce.com is considered to be the leader of the pack in the SaaS market. If SalesForce.com can be down, availability issues can (and will) happen to any SaaS vendor, no matter how much they brag about redundant systems, fail safes, power generators and secured data centers… But going back to the SalesForce.com example, “service disruption affected all areas from 20.39 to 21.17 GMT on 6 January… or only 38 minutes without service.

Some people have questioned whether such incidents could harm the adoption of SaaS. I think, maybe… but not for Sales Performance Management. I think that SaaS applications and their availability will only keep improving. And I think that as the SPM SaaS applications mature, it will become more and more difficult for even the most technologically capable companies to have the availability of their on-premise application competing with the availability of the on-demand applications.

So do I think SaaS applications is a good solution for everybody? Probably not. Is it an option worth at least considering?  I think so!

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Insurance Incentive Compensation Management Applications
Insurance ICM Industry Market Overview

8 Predictions for the Incentive Compensation Industry in 2009

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

It’s the time of the year where everyone makes their predictions for 2009.  With all the economic turmoil of 2008, 2009 should be an interesting year for sales performance management.

Last year I mentioned that I believed 2008 would see a surge in demand for the on-demand market.  Checked!  We’ve seen many companies entering this space with new on-demand solutions and many vendors shifting their focus from an on-premise to an on-demand strategy.

Now I have a few thoughts about where I think the market will be heading in 2009…

1)    On-Demand still going strong – Some people believe the on-demand wave will slow down.   I don’t think this will apply much to Sales Performance Management.  With many budget cuts/freezes, enterprises across the world are more reluctant to make any large IT investments before they can see a positive move in the economy.  Since I believe the economy will take several months before it recovers, I think these companies will be more likely to have a closer look at on-demand solutions.

2)     Hybrid SPM Solutions – This may take a while before it comes…  With the SPM vendors (as every other company) concerned about surviving/striving in a tough economy, R&D budgets may suffer.  But at some point, I’m sure we’ll see many SaaS solutions which can be accessed off-line.  In other words, the SPM solution, sitting on someone’s laptop, could be synchronized with the on-demand server and then used without an internet connection.    I’m also hoping that configuration could happen while being “offline”.

3)    More Customer Focus – With an increasing number of excellent SPM solutions available, one of the key factors in getting new customers and retaining old ones will be customer focus.

4)    Death (and birth) of Acronyms – Incentive compensation is a booming niche market and it should be no surprise that new lingo and new acronyms are “invented daily”.  Some of the terminology will stick, some of it will become less popular and die.  For example, I believe that ICM (Incentive Compensation Management) and EIM (Enterprise Incentive Management) will slowly disappear and be replaced by SPM (Sales Performance Management) – even if they are not the same thing.  On-premise and On-demand might stick and replace more technical lingo like SaaS (Software-as-a-Service).  Others may never catch on (like trying to replace “on-demand” by “the cloud”).

5)    Revamp of compensation plans – Many companies will choose to revisit their old compensation plans and either tweak them or re-design them.  I think that vendors and consulting companies will have more implementation revenues from existing solutions compared to previous years.

6)    Surge of boutique consulting firms – Two points here;  with many people being “let go” from SPM vendors, I’m sure many will decide to try starting their own company or become independent consultants.  Also, with companies becoming more cost conscious, they will consider boutique firms as implementation partners, instead of only considering large IT shops (Accenture, Deloitte, etc).

7)    Importance of the balance sheets – Companies choosing a new SPM solution or an implementation partner will pay even more attention to the companies’ balance sheets.  The technology will still be important, so will the experience, but a deal breaker will be the financial viability of the vendor/partner being considered.

8)    Open Source Solutions – This could be a stretch, but with many people with the right skill set finding themselves without a job, we may be seeing some open-source SPM solutions emerging.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Setting Sales Quotas
The Surge of On-Demand (SaaS) Incentive Applications

Sales Performance Management Vendors List

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (9 votes, average: 2.78 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

If you did some research about potential sales performance management / enterprise incentive management solutions for your company already, you will have read about some of the top players in that space.  However, there are dozens of SPM solutions that are not as easy to come across, because they are very focused on a specific industry, because they are new in the space, or simply because their web presence may not be what it should be.

I recently worked on a vendor’s guide for OpenSymmetry, profiling 15 leading solutions, many of which I have reviewed on this blog.  These vendors were included based on their client base, corporate recognition, and their contribution to the field of SPM.  They are:

  • ACTEK: ACom3
  • Callidus Software: Callidus Product Suite (TrueComp)
  • Centive: Compel
  • CSSI: Vue Software
  • Enterprise Incentive Software: CATS
  • Glow Teknologies: GloCent
  • Merced Systems: Merced Incentive Management
  • nGenera: nGen Comp
  • Oracle: Oracle Incentive Compensation (OIC)
  • SAP: HR Enterprise Compensation
  • SunGard: iWorks EIM
  • Varicent Software: Varicent SPM
  • Versata Software: Versata Commission
  • Xactly Corporation: Incent
  • ZS Associates: Javelin

I mentioned before that the Sales Performance Management market is seeing an explosion of new solutions to satisfy everybody’s needs.  I also listed 39 additional vendors offering a flavor of incentive compensation within their solution.   With a total of 54 Incentive Compensation solutions, a number which I suspect will keep growing - especially if the economy recovers - it can be a real challenge to find the best solution for your needs.

I can’t share the guide on my blog, but since I put some effort into it, if you send me an email at julien.dionne@opensymmetry.com or call me at 713-819-3979, I will be glad to send you a copy.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
SPM Vendor Selection Part 2: Shortlisting SPM Vendors
Insurance ICM Industry Market Overview

“New” Sales Compensation Solution – Makana Motivator Pro

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

I knew about this since a few months, but I was impatiently waiting for the official news to come out before announcing it.  For those of you thinking “wait a minute, you reviewed Makana Motivator already on your blog”, well this is not the same beast.  Makana Motivator was only for plan planning, but Makana Motivator PRO is a self-service solution to not only plan, but also calculate commissions and bonuses.

So with the market starting to feel saturated with SPM solutions, is there place for another one?  I think that there is a place for this one at least…  why?  Because rather than trying to do the same thing as the other SaaS/on-demand solutions, Makana Motivator Pro is for smaller companies.

At $29 per month, and with no implementation fee (it’s supposed to be easy enough to be implemented by anyone), maybe this is the kind of application which is required to convince smaller companies to replace their spreadsheet.

Review coming soon…  I think…

Tags: , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Makana Motivator for Free!
Makana Solutions Launched Web Portal