Vue Software

Tag Archive for 'Performance'

Quality versus Quantity: Aligning Sales Incentives with Profitability (Part 2)

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Even if market practice for a job suggests metrics that are exclusively growth oriented (e.g., revenue), many industries and jobs are or will have to shift the focus away from growth and toward profitability because of the economy. So with a look-forward perspective, you need to address: how does each job influence profitability? In general, influencers or drivers of profitability for sales roles fall into one of the following four categories:

  • Revenue through product preference or price protection
  • Cost containment
  • Risk mitigation
  • Strategic influences; e.g., business growth, customer service, cross sell, efficiency (e.g., utilization of CIS)

Revenue drivers apply when sellers have autonomy over pricing or product positioning. To motivate performance in this area, management can include gross margin or product-specific quotas into the plan, keeping in mind that in transactional selling environments, sellers can increase today’s margins at the expense of longer terms growth. One way to achieve a balance between short- and longer-term measures in the incentive plan is to link the product or gross margin goal attainment score with that of overall revenue (through a matrix, for example).

Cost containment is not typically a function of transactional sellers, though selling supervisors and relationship managers of large, complex accounts might have impact over the use of company resources (e.g., support personnel), T&E, freight and other deal-specific variables that count as expense. Stay clear of operating or allocated costs over which the job has no influence. Inclusion of such “fixed” costs adds complexity to the incentive scheme.

Risk mitigation includes adjustments for factors that could influence longer-term profitability. Examples include customer viability, third-party partner involvement and cost of capital. More risky industries typically use risk departments to assess the degree of risk inherent in each deal, thus freeing the sales function to focus on bringing deals to the table (a balance of power, so to speak). While sales people are often in a unique position to assess certain risk factors, their inherent motivation is to find ways to make the deal happen, not prevent it. The wiser choice is to use other mechanisms, including senior leadership review, to mitigate risk.

Strategic drivers include indirect factors that contribute to efficiency, customer loyalty, price protection and other, likely contributors to profitability. Measures such as cross sell, customer penetration (percent of wallet) and customer satisfaction fall into this category. Remember these are indirect factors. More efficient sales people aren’t necessarily more productive; happy customers aren’t necessarily loyal customers, especially those with low price elasticity.

Some industries, such as retail, use customer satisfaction as a key competitive differentiator. In such industries, motivating employees to delight customers is mission critical. It’s not upside, not bonus. These are table stakes, and in the total rewards framework, compensated through base salary. Those employees going above and beyond should receive special recognition.

Putting pay at risk, through the incentive plan, for strategic items is probably not effective unless there are meaningful dollars at stake (>20% of base salary). Otherwise, sales people dismiss these goals as not important, and focus on what will make a difference to their pay. Getting sales people to focus on drivers of efficiency, penetration and customer loyalty requires drum banging from all levels of the organization, from the CEO down to the line supervisor. Everyone, leadership especially, must walk the talk. Only when you have such continuity and unwavering organizational commitment can you expect the sales force to focus and make progress here.

Strategic drivers can be more difficult to track and report. Cross-selling is often self-reported, customer satisfaction a subjective and cost-intensive exercise. Employees have to believe the data and be able to see the connection between their actions and the company’s objectives. Otherwise, they’re not motivated (at best) or, if there’s pay at risk, upset.

As the figure below suggests, you are more likely to get results by introducing measures over which the sales people believe they have meaningful light of sight. Your best chance at increasing sales person focus on drivers of profitability is to emphasize through goals and incentive opportunity factors they currently, or perceive they can, influence.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Sales Incentives and Profitability Key Points
Quality versus Quantity: Aligning Sales Incentives with Profitability (Part 3)

Woohoo! Some companies are starting to get it!

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 3 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

I came across this news release today: “AMDL, Inc. Completes Revision of Performance & Equity Incentive Compensation Plan

I never heard about AMDL Inc. but lets see what they are doing to their incentive compensation plans. Ahh… “Under the terms of the Plan, AMDL has transitioned from a discretionary cash and options-based bonus plan to a performance-based, stock and cash incentive plan”. Sounds a lot like what I said here!

According to the press release, plan highlights include:

  • Performance based incentive awards
  • Board-determined quarterly income performance targets
  • Limited cash bonus awards
  • Reaffirmation of AMDL’s commitment to not issue discretionary incentive awards

But there’s more… “all stock granted to senior executives and employees as incentive compensation will be scheduled to vest only if the Company’s meets its strategic goals and specific financial performance targets”. I’m far from being an expert on executive compensation, but that also sounds like a pretty good idea.

Ok… there is nothing ground breaking in this article, but the point is that a lot of companies are following a similar approach, and they finally understand (hopefully) that incentive compensation needs to be tied to actual performance.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Popularity Burst
“New” Sales Compensation Solution – Makana Motivator Pro

It’s my first birthday!

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (3 votes, average: 1.67 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

LeapComp is celebrating its first year!  Time just flew by since I first decided to blog and it has been a great ride so far.

December 17, 2007: Launch of my blog at compensationexpert.blogspot.com
December 21, 2007: First post “What is Incentive, Compensation and Sales Performance Management
December 23, 2007: I received an e-mail from my first reader
April 29, 2008: After four months of “double digit growth”, break the barrier of 1000 unique visitors within a month
May 17, 2008: 100 articles milestone!
August 10, 2008: Transferred blog from blogspot to its own domain – leapcomp.com
September 15, 2008:Google “PageRank” (measuring the importance of a website) upgraded to 5, the same ranking as Callidus and Varicent, and beating other vendors such as Centive and Xactly
September 22, 2008: After several various designs, LeapComp receives its current look and logo
October 1, 2008: Most popular post “Come on SPM Vendors… Grow up!” receives 20 votes, 18 comments, and over 8000 hits during October
December 17, 2008: Currently 143 published posts, and many other drafts waiting to be published in 2009, with a readership which has been increasing quickly quarter after quarter
A year ago I was wondering if I’d have enough ideas to write for an entire year.  A year later I’m realizing that I just scratched the surface of the topic and I believe you will find many more exciting articles in 2009.

I would like to extend my thanks to everyone who has provided me with valuable feedback, to my fellow bloggers and SPM companies who have been linking to LeapComp, and most importantly to my readers who have found LeapComp to be a valuable source of independent information on sales performance management.

Happy Holidays!

Tags: , , , , ,

Related Posts:
No related posts

Commission, Bonus or Entitlement?

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 3 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Commissions and bonuses should be mechanisms to reward outstanding performance, a certain behavior, and concrete outcomes.  They are likely to fail when they become perceived as an entitlement, which means they are no longer considered as a special reward.  Eventually, the organization might decide to take away that “entitlement” to reinstate it as a reward – the way it was intended to be – but that’s when employees are likely to react in a very negative way.

I learned this very early on when I had just graduated from University.  Almost as soon as I graduated, I bought a small 3 bedroom townhouse, and I rented one of the rooms to a guy I’ll call Joe (this is a fictional name so he won’t try to sue me for defamation).  After living with Joe for several months, I got tired of seeing his dirty dishes, clothes on the floor, and I also wanted to encourage him to do his share of the housekeeping.

So I told Joe, “I know that you don’t really care about keeping the house very clean, and since you are paying me for rent, I can’t really force you to clean up after yourself, but I really wish the house was cleaner.”  So here was my proposition: “How would $50 off your monthly rent incite you to keep the house clean”.  Right away he said “Of course!  Great idea!”  So we sat down and made a list detailing the responsibilities and schedule for the various housekeeping activities, including day-to-day expectations.

The house was clean for the first month, and I gave Joe 50$ back for that month.  Joe wrote me post-dated checks with the new amount for the rest of the year.  The only problem is that in the second month, he started to slip some tasks.  On the 3rd month, many items on the list were being ignored.  On the 4th month, it’s just like if we did not have a list.

On the 4th month I said “Joe, our agreement is obviously not working, please give me the $50 you owe me”.  I probably should have said something sooner, but I did not, and this resulted in a big fight.  Joe started to look for a new place the next month; not because I kicked him out, but because he was no longer happy.
I learned with this one “employee” and one “reward plan” that it is important to set clear expectations (clean up after himself), offer constant performance feedback, and to make sure it stays clear that the payment (reduced rent) is only something that will take place upon meeting these expectations and performance level.  As I discussed before, set clear performance indicators (KPI), and ensure that they are measurable objectives.  Following this advice will help keeping employees happy and potentially increase the retention rate.

There are many real-life professional examples of rewards being taken away, particularly now with the economic challenges, causing employees to react.  This ranges from Google taking out their “free food” program, to many companies getting rid of their share purchase programs.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Common Pitfalls in Sales Compensation Design
Canada Public Service’s Bilingualism Bonus

Lehman Brothers, Dilbert and a Lesson on Motivation

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (5 votes, average: 3.8 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Since I talked about Lehman Brothers in my last post, it seemed appropriate to share a recent Dilbert cartoon.  If you think that reading Dilbert cartoons is very “geeky”, reading it on an incentive blog is probably worse.  I actually saw the cartoon on Paul Hebert’s Incentive Intelligence blog.

Why is Dilbert’s boss wrong about “motivation and fear being the same thing?  To quote Paul:

In the short-term, fear will do wonders - but the long-term impact is very bad - turnover, lack of positive company culture, recruiting problems - you name it.

Tags: , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Is (Incentive) Compensation a Villain Of the Credit Crisis
A Lesson on Motivation at the Elephant Nature Park