Vue Software

Tag Archive for 'SaaS'

Negotiating a SaaS Contract

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 4 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

I talked about SaaS Contract Negotiations before, but I found another great article from ERP Software Advice on this topic here. The author describes 9 points that can be negotiated within a SaaS agreement. Here is a short summary:

1. Pricing and Discounts: Obviously, published pricing can usually be negotiated, and the bigger the deal, the bigger the discount.
2. Additional Costs: Aside from the standard monthly fee, other costs can quickly add up, such as fees for additional users, customizations, integrations, third-party services, training and set-up fees.
3. Term: A longer term can mean a better deal.
4. Service Level Agreements: Make sure that SLAs – the vendor’s commitment to keeping the system up and running – are clearly defined in the contract.
5. Renewals: This process is an opportunity to renegotiate or exit a bad contract. Make sure there you are still in control when it’s renewal time.
6. Scalability Pricing: Find out what pricing options are available to increase the number of users and if there is the possibility to decrease it.
7. Support: The contract should describe the level of support that will be received: is it delivered via the web, email, phone? Is it 24 / 7?
8. Backups and Recovery: The contract should specify how often backups are performed, how long it will be kept, and if it is kept in a separate center in case of disaster.
9. Data Export: Can data be retrieved from the system?

Tags: ,

Related Posts:
Tips for SaaS Contract Negotiations, and Knowledge Transfer
SaaS – Future or Buzz?

SaaS – Future or Buzz?

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (7 votes, average: 4.29 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

I had a good conversation with Chris Cabrera, the CEO of Xactly Corporation, last week. We spent an hour talking about Software as a Service (SaaS) and why people should care. He is definitely one of the people most passionate about this topic that I know!

For those who don’t remember, I wrote an article called “Buy the Car, Rent the Car or Take the Bus” which explains the difference between on-premise, single-tenancy and multi-tenancy.

“Many people are confused about what SaaS is, and about the benefits of a pure SaaS solution” said Cabrera. “Many companies use the term incorrectly to be buzzword compliant. That’s too bad because some people start to believe it is only a marketing gimmick.” I asked him why people should actually care about if a solution is SaaS or not. Playing the devil’s advocate, it would seem like most potential customers would not care if a solution is really a SaaS solution versus hosted, or multi-tenancy versus single-tenancy.

Chris mentioned 6 reasons why potential customers should care:

  1. It is in the client’s interest for the vendor – their technology partner – to be around long term. On-premise solutions are not cost effective because they have so many technology stacks and versions of the software that need to be maintained and supported. With SaaS solutions, some of the savings are passed back to the client, and a significant portion of the revenues are reinvested into the infrastructure as well as in the development of new features.
  2. SaaS vendors can focus on improving a single software version, used by every customer. Every engineer is dedicated to improving a single source of code. This allows the vendor to release new features and improvements much more quickly than is typically feasible with an on-premise solution.
  3. Upgrading a SaaS solution usually happens ‘behind the scenes’. New SaaS software releases are tested extremely rigorously before being released. A quality problem would impact thousands of customers and hundreds of thousands of payees. On-premise solutions often transfer the quality ownership to the clients who must perform their own regression testing after an often labor intensive upgrade process.
  4. Non-SaaS solutions are not always scalable. For example, with 10, 100 or even 1000 customers, an on-premise solution might work. But the real test will be when a solution is used by thousands of customers – will a non-SaaS solution really be able to scale up? “Probably not” said Cabrera.
  5. SaaS vendors constantly measure and monitor their environment. They make a significant investment into that infrastructure to ensure an optimal performance for all of their customers.
  6. SaaS solutions are usually sold on a basis of $ per payee per month. Solutions such as Xactly Incent all of a sudden become cost effective for even small companies which can avoid a high upfront infrastructure and license cost.

Chris Cabrera is convinced of one thing: SaaS is the future. “On-premise solutions might still be appropriate for a very small share of the market, but SaaS is appropriate at least 98% of the time.” Looking at the market trends, I would say he’s right. Most vendors realized the benefits of SaaS and are rushing in that direction.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility
Tips for SaaS Contract Negotiations, and Knowledge Transfer

A small sovereign city-state located in South Western Europe on the northern central coast of the Mediterranean Sea

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

What is Monaco?

Bingo!

But Monaco is also the name of Callidus’ latest on-demand offering. The only problem is that they haven’t done a very good job at advertising it – which is one of the reasons why I’m receiving many questions on this topic.

The press release about Monaco came out a few months ago but faded quickly. It describes Callidus Monaco as:

A robust, SaaS offering that delivers the most modern-looking and rich user interface experience available in the sales performance management marketplace today. The Callidus Monaco Suite is the only unified SPM software solution that provides complete alignment of the entire business with corporate objectives to optimize performance, streamline profitability and deliver a rapid ROI.

…Yet another “only unified SPM software solution”. That press release also mentions that the solution is a multi-tenant SPM offering which streamlines:
• Objective Management
• Quota Management
• Reporting and Analytics
• Compensation Calculation
• Embedded Workflow
• Plan Distribution

After reading this, I was wondering if Callidus Monaco was only a rebranding of the Callidus On-Demand SPM, a new solution that would be replacing it eventually, another offering that would be available in parallel, the same solution but ‘multi-tenant’…?

What I found out is that Monaco is a combination of many existing on-demand offerings, focused on SMBs. For example, the Objective Management and Quota Management features are offered through TrueMBO and TrueQuota which I reviewed here. TrueMBO and TrueQuota can be purchased as standalone applications, but they are also unified with the core ‘Monaco’ product which is similar to TrueComp with a Web 2.0 facelift and more basic templates available out of the box.

Callidus Monaco will be offered in parallel to Callidus SPM On-Demand.  Callidus On-Demand will be  limited to customers in specific industries such as Insurance.  All other customers wanting to use an On-Demand solution from Callidus will be offered Monaco.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Valentine’s Day in Prison
Crappy Incentive Plan

Buy the Car, Rent the Car or Take the Bus

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (5 votes, average: 3.4 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

I found an interesting comment on LinkedIn from Chris Collins regarding the difference between On-Premise, On-Demand (Single-Tenant) and On-Demand (Multi-Tenant).  This is not the first time I hear or use the car rental versus car buying analogy, but I think it is well explained and I enjoyed the ‘bus’ example:

Here is one analogy that I use to demonstrate the concept of SaaS to non-technical audiences that always seems to get them understanding the basic idea. I tell them to imagine 2 cars and a bus.

BUY THE CAR: The first car they buy and pay for outright. They are responsible for all maintenance, insurance, gas. This is analagous to buying the hardware and traditionally licensing the software yourself in house. You as the buyer are very interested in the technology you are getting.

RENT THE CAR: The second car they rent by the month. You don’t own the car but you have some say over where the car goes and you are still somewhat interested in the technology. When you go the rental car parking lot, you have a choice of cars and your decision of which car to choose is somewhat based on technology. Also, one person rents one car. This is somewhat analagous to a traditional ASP model. The point is someone else might own it, but you are still interested in the technology underlying it.

TAKE THE BUS: The bus is multi-tenant. When the transmission (platform) is changed on the bus, every tenant is affected because they are riding on the same platform. BUT when you take the bus, unlike when you buy or rent a car, you are not as interested in the underlying technology but in what the bus can do for you. You are now looking primarily at the service aspect, what need can it fulfill for you? If you need to go to the mall and a bus arrives whose ticker says “Mall” on its route, then you take it for that reason, not because of the the transmission on the bus. You only pay for the cost to get to the mall, not by month or not the full cost of the bus.

However you can take the analogy a little further. If you are transporting precious cargo on the bus, you will of course want to make sure the bus is safe from hijackers while stopped and in transport just the same way customers still want to be sure their precious data is protected. If there is a particular transmission type that that is known to have holes in it and cargo sometimes falls out, the customer will want to know about that upfront.Then you risk losing the customer’s focus on the service and put it back on the technology. That is a very important concept.

Do you think this applies to a Sales Performance Management solution licensing model decision?

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Commission, Bonus or Entitlement?
SaaS – Future or Buzz?

Excentive Incentive Management Review

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (15 votes, average: 3.73 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Here is my latest Incentive Compensation Management application review. This week I am reviewing a relatively unknown (in North America) solution called Excentive Incentive Management.  Excentive was incorporated in 2002. Since then, they have gained a lot of popularity in France and have signed major clients such as Canon, Orange, and Air France. Earlier this year, they raised 700,000 Euros ($880,000 US) to accelerate international growth, part of over $1 million raised in recent months to fuel global expansion.

They also assembled an additional team driven by 10 seasoned managers active in the globalization of companies such as SAP, Hyperion, and OutlookSoft. One of their key target markets is of course North America, so we may soon start seeing some Excentive implementations over here if they can overcome some major challenges ahead, namely convincing prospective clients that they have the capability to deliver and support their implementations in the US, and that they are financially stable.

What is particularly interesting about the Excentive solution is that it includes performance management modules in addition to the sales performance solution. It makes it easy to compensate employees based on MBO campaigns. It’s a very flexible solution which can be a good option for as few as 50 payees, to as many as 50,000 payees, and it can be deployed on-premise or hosted.  Excentive Incentive Management is deployed across industries, and some implementations can process as many as 2 million transactions daily.

From the “regular” employee perspective, the application mostly consists of a repository of reports. These reports can be configured and customized by an administrator, but standard reports exist for most common information such as commission statements and performance review results.

Employees can also see the details of their compensation plans and can easily find out which commission was paid and find out if any transactions are missing.

Managers have access to additional information such as their team’s performance, salaries, etc.

Managers can also consult their employee’s records containing information about their past performance such as commissions earned in previous periods.

In addition to reports, managers can edit some of their team’s information including new salary figures, bonus values, based on constraints configured by the administrators.

One of the biggest features for managers is to be able to provide rating for their employees’ performance and to reuse all that info in a salary review process or a stock option allocation exercise, which are also supported by Excentive.

Finally, let’s look at some of the configuration of the solution, from the administrator’s perspective.
“Campaigns”, or the performance management component, can be configured in a few clicks from the campaigns menu.

Bonus and commission rules can be configured easily in a 3-step process. First, the properties of the rule are setup which includes the name of the rule and the dates for which it is effective. The rules engine can thus access the quantitative data (eg. sales by product/territory/period , margins, etc) as well as the quantitative performance indicators (eg. team spirit, customer loyalty, etc). This allows the calculation of the incentive (commission) as well as the bonus. Rules can be used for the classic earnings calculations as well as for recommendations and simulations.

The criteria step consists of specifying the conditions which must be met for the commission to fire.
This formula can be typed in, or created by clicking on the functions and other information stored in the database.

The resulting calculation is configured in the same way as the condition.

The reports we have looked at so far were all numbers presented in a tabular format, but it’s also possible to integrate visual elements to dashboards and reports.

Excentive’s solution also includes integrated modules to perform more complex tasks:

  • Hierarchy Manager: combine different dimensions such as region/office/people into multiple hierarchies necessary for workflow and approval processes.
  • Pool Manager: create teams and delegate ‘people-to-team’ assignments to local managers.
  • Mobility Manager: spot team changes and transfer people between departments/managers. Manage partial, time and team depending compensations
  • Culture Manager associate people with language, currency, location
  • Environment Manager which is a secure and fast way to move an application change from a development environment towards a test or production environment

Overall, Excentive is a slick web based application which shows a lot of promise if they can inspire enough trust from prospective clients. Since all modules are integrated in one solution at no additional cost, Excentive could be a good play for clients looking for not only incentive compensation management, but the entire spectrum of salary and performance management. Now could be a good time to negotiate a favorable price from the vendor, given that they are aggressively trying to enter this North American market.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Excentive
Merced Systems

Exclusive Interview with Christopher Cabrera of Xactly, on Centive Acquisition

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (25 votes, average: 3.08 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Christopher Cabrera, Founder, President and CEO of Xactly

Xactly Corporation completed the acquisition of Centive barely a week ago. Christopher Cabrera, Founder, President and CEO of Xactly, tells us what this acquisition bodes for Xactly and the SPM SaaS market.

LeapComp: Hi Chris – congratulations on the news!
CC: Thanks, Julien. It’s an exciting time for Xactly and the on-demand sales performance management market.

LeapComp: How long have you been planning to acquire another company? Was the state of the economy a catalyst for the acquisition?
CC: As a fast-growing company, we are always looking for ways to accelerate market share and customer value. And when the opportunity arose with Centive, we saw that the synergies of combining our two businesses would offer significant value to customers, partners and prospects.

As for the state of the economy, SaaS in general is experiencing a surge in adoption rates because the model makes good economic sense, while sales performance management applications in particular make good strategic sense. The combination of Xactly and Centive will result in even stronger on-demand SPM solutions that will provide value – in both good and challenging economic times – to companies of all sizes, across virtually every industry.

LeapComp: Why did you choose to acquire Centive in particular? Were other companies also considered?
CC: Like Xactly, Centive is a 100% on-demand company focused on SPM, and a strong player in the market. We speak the same language, share similar cultures and we frequently approached the same prospects. In acquiring Centive, we can very quickly increase the scale and functionality of an already broad on-demand SPM product portfolio.

LeapComp: How does Xactly’s acquisition of Centive impact the SPM market? How will Centive fit into Xactly’s strategy?
CC: The acquisition significantly strengthens the on-demand sector of the SPM industry – which is the fastest-growing area. Customers looking for a pure SaaS solution can have confidence in the viability of a well-capitalized company committed to delivering the broadest and richest suite of SPM functionality.

At the same time, the acquisition meets Xactly’s own strategic needs as we offer a unified SPM product platform that will address important product opportunities and enable us to focus even more strongly on innovation and growth strategies. The acquisition also provides us with enhanced distribution through a broader partner ecosystem, and strengthens our go-to-market resources through broader sales and services coverage.

LeapComp: What do you believe will be your greatest post-acquisition integration challenge?

CC: Customer satisfaction will be our top priority. Xactly has traditionally had very high customer-satisfaction and renewal rates. We’re reaching out now to every Centive customer and partner to communicate our commitment and our plans to make this a smooth transition with minimal disruption. We have communicated that we intend to support both product platforms for a minimum of 18 months while we work towards a unified product roadmap.

LeapComp: With this acquisition, who do you see as your biggest competitor?
CC: Our greatest competitor is, and always has been, organizations’ use of spreadsheets and other manual methods to manage incentive sales compensation and sales performance. The vast majority of companies are still stuck in this paradigm, much to their disadvantage. Economical SaaS solutions like Xactly’s make it a lot easier and more cost effective to automate these processes, become more strategic in managing incentive compensation, and ultimately boost sales performance compared to far more costly, legacy, on-premise software solutions.

LeapComp: What is the combined Xactly and Centive product roadmap? What are the future plans of Xactly?
CC: Xactly will spend the next several weeks carefully evaluating the technologies before determining a unified product roadmap. During this time, Xactly will support both product platforms – Xactly Incent with add-on modules and Centive Compel – for a minimum of 18 months to ensure ongoing customer success and a seamless transition to new features/functionality and products. The ultimate goal is to provide the best of both products within a single interface for customers.

LeapComp: How is the transaction between Xactly and Centive expected to benefit current customers of both companies?
CC: Customers will have a larger, stronger company to partner with, possessing more resources to meet customer needs and ensure their success. The combined companies will drive market leadership by offering the most robust SPM platform on the market, and by accelerating innovation across the SPM spectrum – all to the good of customers.

LeapComp: Until both solutions and client base are “merged”, will new customers still have the option to choose one of the solution, or is Xactly Incent now the only option?
CC: As we move to a unified product roadmap, we are encouraging prospects to select the platform that best meets their requirements and will help them determine which solution is the best fit for them. We will ensure that investments made by new prospects will be preserved, and will deliver feature enhancements for Centive Compel customers as they have been committed to customers.

LeapComp: In 18 months, when the solutions as we know them today are no longer supported, is there a risk that any re-implementation will be required for either or both of Centive or Xactly’s customers?
CC: Details on a migration program, should it be required, will be communicated once a unified product roadmap is determined. It’s our intent to minimize disruption. Ultimately, the customer will come out ahead as we intend to provide the strongest possible solution on the market.

LeapComp: Chris, thanks for your time and good luck with the challenges ahead!
CC: Thank you. We’re looking forward to a great year.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Centive
BREAKING NEWS – Xactly acquires Centive