Incentive Compensation and Sales Performance Management Survey

Tag Archive for 'Sales Compensation'

Sales Incentives and Profitability Key Points

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Through this week I posted a long article “Quality versus Quantity: Aligning Sales Incentives with Profitability” broken down in 5 parts.

Part 1: The first part of the series introduced the concept of aligning incentives and profitability and talked about the difference between incentive, bonus and recognition

Part 2: This post discussed four category of profitability drivers: Revenue through product preference or price protection, cost containment, risk mitigation and strategic influences.

Part 3: This third post discussed the importance and benefits of accurate reporting.

Part 4: This part focused on change management and how to prepare sales people to focus their time on new objectives / compensation plans.

Part 5: Finally, this last post reminded us how good intentions can sometimes lead to unintended outcomes and provided two such examples.

Key Points

There was a lot of content in this 5-part article, so here are some of the main takeaways:

  • The sales force can be a key contributor to the company’s bottom line.
  • Some sales jobs can influence profitability, some can not.
  • Clear, reliable and timely measurement is key to holding individuals accountable for progress toward individual and unit profitability goals.
  • All levels of the organization, from the CEO on down, must champion the effort behind any fundamental change.
  • A short-term emphasis on profitability can lead to longer-term consequences.
  • When considering changes to sales people’s pay, include low risk options such as SPIFFs.

Tags: , , , ,

Related Posts:
Quality versus Quantity: Aligning Sales Incentives with Profitability (Part 3)
Quality versus Quantity: Aligning Sales Incentives with Profitability (Part 1)

Percent of Revenue Spent on Sales Incentives?

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

I recently wrote about a Callidus press release claiming that Telcos in EMEA typically spent 10% of their revenue on incentive compensation.  My first reaction was to think that this number was very high.  But with my job, I rarely see a company’s overall compensation budget…

Today Makana Solutions released a piece of their compensation survey.  Keep in mind that this survey was for small businesses, but the majority of respondents spend 5-10% of their revenues on sales incentives.  It sounds like the Callidus “10%” could be accurate :-)

Source: http://www.makanasolutions.com/Blog/bid/8497/What-is-the-right-percent-of-revenue-to-allocate-for-sales-incentives

Tags: , , ,

Related Posts:
How Healthy is the Incentive Compensation Industry?
ICM News This Week

Non-Cash Incentives

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 4.5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

I briefly talked about non-cash incentives here, but I need to repeat some of these fundamentals to introduce tomorrow’s topic.

Non-cash rewards are used to motivate employees, reward them for their performance and encourage specific behaviors. Whenever I need to know anything about non-cash rewards, I turn to Paul Hebert who runs the Incentive Intelligence blog. In an old post, Paul says that “cash and non-cash are both critical in creating an engaged audience. Neither is better. Neither is worse.” He defines both type of rewards as follows:

Paychecks and cash bonuses are transactional - they communicate an “impersonal” relationship. They do focus attention, create direction and communicate goals and objectives. But they are cold. Income and cash bonuses are things that are negotiated. They are bartered and dealt. They are things you don’t talk about at parties with your friends.

Non-cash - whether that be merchandise, travel, recognition, plaques, etc. - are emotional. They are talked about at parties. People show off their pictures of the trip they took or watch the game on the big screen they earned - and brag about it. People don’t show you their bonus check.

He concludes his post by saying that both type of rewards must be used together to “shape, reinforce, change and maintain behaviors that help people stay in alignment with business goals and objectives”.

Since I wrote my non-cash reward article, the economic crisis became more pronounced. This has caused many people to complain that they really couldn’t care less about all the “useless” rewards they are receiving, and that their company should just give them more money instead. I’ve heard that from people who have been receiving paper weights, company clocks, shirts with a company logo on it, etc.

But on the other hand, many people who have more flexibility in what they can get as a non-cash reward, have been bragging about it. They argue that even if the economy is not great, that their company is still treating them very well!

I think that the obvious conclusion is that sometimes, a non-cash reward can do a better job at motivating the workforce than what the cash equivalent could have done. One of the key for the non-cash rewards to work is to offer something that the employees actually want. Since it is very unlikely that they’ll all want the same thing, flexibility in what they can get is the secret.

Companies should also be careful not to “overdo” non-cash rewards. Employees still care about cash, and still need it. If incentive compensation is significantly reduced at the expense of non-cash rewards, employees could get frustrated.

As with most things, it’s all about striking the perfect balance.

But no matter how well your incentive budget is distributed between cash and non-cash incentives, letting your employees know that they are appreciated does not cost anything and will go a long way in motivating them.

Tags: , ,

Related Posts:
Olympics Pay-for-Performance, Cash-for-Medals
Visa’s approach to Incentive Compensation

Makana Motivator for Free!

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 2 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

I talked about Makana Solutions’ product - Motivator - before. Makana offers a solution to build really good compensation plans and help you out in the process every step of the way.

The usual cost for Makana Motivator is $49 per month for up to 20 participants, $69 for 21 to 100 participants, and $149 for more than 100 participants. A yearly subscription will even cut that cost by 2 months.

Game Plan
Makana just launched a new program called “Game Plan”. Game Plan is a free program to help out with your 2009 Sales Compensation planning. It offers a free year’s subscription to Makana Motivator and strategic advice with sales compensation experts.

The catch? You have to take a training in July or August to receive your free one year subscription. That probably doesn’t sound too bad, so there is no reason why you shouldn’t check it out.

Note: Makana didn’t ask me to promote this “deal”. I don’t usually promote any Sales Performance solution, but… it’s free!

Tags: , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Makana Solutions
“New” Sales Compensation Solution – Makana Motivator Pro

Webinar Galore - 2 SPM Webinars Tomorrow

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 3 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

I will try to provide coverage on this blog for these 2 webinars taking place tomorrow. The webinar hosted by Callidus features an Accenture partner discussing the insurance industry, and the Xactly webinar features Jeff Kaplan discussing on-demand sales performance analytics. Follow the links to register.

Callidus 7/29 @ 9A CST - Best Practices from Accenture - Align producer and advisor behavior, maximize mindshare - and effectively manage compensation
https://callidussoftware.webex.com/callidussoftware/onstage/g.php?d=570992696&t=a

Learn about insurance industry best practices from Jon Walheim - Accenture Partner - North America Insurance Marketing, Sales, and Service Lead. You’ll learn about key trends in the insurance industry, challenges that organizations are facing, and what insurance leaders are doing to gain competitive advantage.

Xactly 7/29 @ noon CST - The Business Case for On-Demand Sales Performance Management Analytics
https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/415893690

In this Webinar, Xactly’s Karen Steele and THINKStrategies’ Jeff Kaplan will discuss how post-sales analytics can provide new and strategic insight into an organization’s selling patterns, commission spend, product performance, sales rep and team performance, and sales plan effectiveness. They will examine how post-sales data – traditionally scattered across a variety of disparate systems including ERP, HR, and Payroll – can be now be integrated and analyzed with an eye towards enhancing business strategies, changing sales rep behaviors, and super-charging sales organizations.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
SPM Analytics Webinar Tomorrow, 1PM Central
LeapComp Launches Incentive Compensation Event Calendar

The Moral to the ICM Saga

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Read Part 1 and Part 2 of this story first.

The blame cannot be put on one person. ABC Corp, the ICM vendor and the consultant all own some of the responsibility for the issue.

The entire situation could have been avoided if the requirements had been better designed. Requirements could have been better designed if the compensation plans had been completed with enough details. The vendor would probably have done a better job at scoping out the work initially or in certain situations may even have not submitted a proposal.

What can we take away from this story?

  • Requirements cannot be fully defined unless the compensation plans are finalized. Requirements may be inaccurate or incomplete unless compensation plans show sufficient details and examples.
  • An ICM solution cannot be selected unless the requirements are fully defined.
  • Not all ICM solutions can handle very complex compensation plans (no matter what the vendor’s rep says). Some solutions are better suited for certain situations.
  • Good requirements are the foundation for any IT project, mess up the requirements and the entire project will be shaky.
  • Using an experienced consultant to help out with the requirements design, RFP writing and solution selection could be a good idea to select the ideal solution.
  • Consultants and vendors alike cannot “always” guess client’s intentions.
  • Mentioning or emailing a requirement is not enough, this requirement must find its way to the requirement document to ensure it is met by the implementation and properly tested.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
The ICM Saga Continues…
Perspective on the Philosphy of Incentives and Can They Really Help you Achieve your Objectives