Compensation Plan Design

Tag Archive for 'Sales Performance Management Solution'

A small sovereign city-state located in South Western Europe on the northern central coast of the Mediterranean Sea

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

What is Monaco?

Bingo!

But Monaco is also the name of Callidus’ latest on-demand offering. The only problem is that they haven’t done a very good job at advertising it – which is one of the reasons why I’m receiving many questions on this topic.

The press release about Monaco came out a few months ago but faded quickly. It describes Callidus Monaco as:

A robust, SaaS offering that delivers the most modern-looking and rich user interface experience available in the sales performance management marketplace today. The Callidus Monaco Suite is the only unified SPM software solution that provides complete alignment of the entire business with corporate objectives to optimize performance, streamline profitability and deliver a rapid ROI.

…Yet another “only unified SPM software solution”. That press release also mentions that the solution is a multi-tenant SPM offering which streamlines:
• Objective Management
• Quota Management
• Reporting and Analytics
• Compensation Calculation
• Embedded Workflow
• Plan Distribution

After reading this, I was wondering if Callidus Monaco was only a rebranding of the Callidus On-Demand SPM, a new solution that would be replacing it eventually, another offering that would be available in parallel, the same solution but ‘multi-tenant’…?

What I found out is that Monaco is a combination of many existing on-demand offerings, focused on SMBs. For example, the Objective Management and Quota Management features are offered through TrueMBO and TrueQuota which I reviewed here. TrueMBO and TrueQuota can be purchased as standalone applications, but they are also unified with the core ‘Monaco’ product which is similar to TrueComp with a Web 2.0 facelift and more basic templates available out of the box.

Callidus Monaco will be offered in parallel to Callidus SPM On-Demand.  Callidus On-Demand will be  limited to customers in specific industries such as Insurance.  All other customers wanting to use an On-Demand solution from Callidus will be offered Monaco.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Valentine’s Day in Prison
Crappy Incentive Plan

Excentive Incentive Management Review

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (13 votes, average: 3.62 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Here is my latest Incentive Compensation Management application review. This week I am reviewing a relatively unknown (in North America) solution called Excentive Incentive Management.  Excentive was incorporated in 2002. Since then, they have gained a lot of popularity in France and have signed major clients such as Canon, Orange, and Air France. Earlier this year, they raised 700,000 Euros ($880,000 US) to accelerate international growth, part of over $1 million raised in recent months to fuel global expansion.

They also assembled an additional team driven by 10 seasoned managers active in the globalization of companies such as SAP, Hyperion, and OutlookSoft. One of their key target markets is of course North America, so we may soon start seeing some Excentive implementations over here if they can overcome some major challenges ahead, namely convincing prospective clients that they have the capability to deliver and support their implementations in the US, and that they are financially stable.

What is particularly interesting about the Excentive solution is that it includes performance management modules in addition to the sales performance solution. It makes it easy to compensate employees based on MBO campaigns. It’s a very flexible solution which can be a good option for as few as 50 payees, to as many as 50,000 payees, and it can be deployed on-premise or hosted.  Excentive Incentive Management is deployed across industries, and some implementations can process as many as 2 million transactions daily.

From the “regular” employee perspective, the application mostly consists of a repository of reports. These reports can be configured and customized by an administrator, but standard reports exist for most common information such as commission statements and performance review results.

Employees can also see the details of their compensation plans and can easily find out which commission was paid and find out if any transactions are missing.

Managers have access to additional information such as their team’s performance, salaries, etc.

Managers can also consult their employee’s records containing information about their past performance such as commissions earned in previous periods.

In addition to reports, managers can edit some of their team’s information including new salary figures, bonus values, based on constraints configured by the administrators.

One of the biggest features for managers is to be able to provide rating for their employees’ performance and to reuse all that info in a salary review process or a stock option allocation exercise, which are also supported by Excentive.

Finally, let’s look at some of the configuration of the solution, from the administrator’s perspective.
“Campaigns”, or the performance management component, can be configured in a few clicks from the campaigns menu.

Bonus and commission rules can be configured easily in a 3-step process. First, the properties of the rule are setup which includes the name of the rule and the dates for which it is effective. The rules engine can thus access the quantitative data (eg. sales by product/territory/period , margins, etc) as well as the quantitative performance indicators (eg. team spirit, customer loyalty, etc). This allows the calculation of the incentive (commission) as well as the bonus. Rules can be used for the classic earnings calculations as well as for recommendations and simulations.

The criteria step consists of specifying the conditions which must be met for the commission to fire.
This formula can be typed in, or created by clicking on the functions and other information stored in the database.

The resulting calculation is configured in the same way as the condition.

The reports we have looked at so far were all numbers presented in a tabular format, but it’s also possible to integrate visual elements to dashboards and reports.

Excentive’s solution also includes integrated modules to perform more complex tasks:

  • Hierarchy Manager: combine different dimensions such as region/office/people into multiple hierarchies necessary for workflow and approval processes.
  • Pool Manager: create teams and delegate ‘people-to-team’ assignments to local managers.
  • Mobility Manager: spot team changes and transfer people between departments/managers. Manage partial, time and team depending compensations
  • Culture Manager associate people with language, currency, location
  • Environment Manager which is a secure and fast way to move an application change from a development environment towards a test or production environment

Overall, Excentive is a slick web based application which shows a lot of promise if they can inspire enough trust from prospective clients. Since all modules are integrated in one solution at no additional cost, Excentive could be a good play for clients looking for not only incentive compensation management, but the entire spectrum of salary and performance management. Now could be a good time to negotiate a favorable price from the vendor, given that they are aggressively trying to enter this North American market.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Excentive
Merced Systems

SPM Vendor Selection Part 4: Vendor Demos / Interviews

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

In my opinion, this is the most important and valuable part of the sales performance management vendor selection process.  The demos can take different forms; for a small on-demand project, these demos are often performed online.  For a large implementation, the remaining competing vendors will usually send a team on-site to present.  This is the first opportunity to really see the look and feel of the solution. The RFP scores of the invited vendors could be very close, so this is where they get the chance to distinguish themselves.  A job candidate is rarely hired without a face-to-face interview; this is it!

How long should the demo last?
A small SaaS solution such as Xactly or Centive could be presented in a few hours, but it really depends on the complexity of the solution.  The length of the demo also depends on how much time you have and how much time the vendor is willing to invest in trying to win the bid.  My advice is that for a large implementation (Callidus, Varicent, Merced, etc) half a day could be enough for an overview of the application, and a full day is not too much to go a bit more in details.

What questions should be asked?
SPM Vendor should be given specific instructions on what they should be demonstrating, which could vary depending on the audience.  Ask yourself what is of interest to the evaluators; the plan configuration and administration?  Reports?  Analytics?  If the evaluators are managers / directors, showing how the configuration plan elements is done may not be necessary.

Demo Scripts
The best way to find out that an SPM solution can do what you would like it to do, is to ask the vendors to configure a few plans.  Don’t only provide the plan details, also provide some sample data.  The sample data only needs to be a few transactions, there is no point in providing hundreds of them.  When the vendors walk you through their solution and results, it will provide a good overview of how their solution works.  If you choose to ask the vendors to implement a few things for the demo, provide them with at least a week to work on them to ensure they have the time to complete the activity.  It’s fair to ask them to create simple rules “on the spot”, or to modify some of their plans, but if you ask them to implement several plans during the demo, valuable time will be wasted.  Also, keep in mind that the goal is to review the solution, and not the ability of the sales engineer to work under high pressure.

Demo Evaluation
Just like for the RFP, a scoring grid should be created ahead of time and distributed to all the evaluators.  Another tip; leave a lot of space for comments.  If the evaluators have laptops, they could even fill the evaluation in a spreadsheet.  It’s never fun to do manual data entry if it can be avoided.  A question I often get is how much should the demo evaluation be worth compared to the RFP.  This is another “it depends” answer.  Typically, I recommend that the evaluation be worth at least 50% of the total score; if it’s a full day demonstration, probably more…  for a short online demonstration, probably less.

When evaluating the different demos, beware of evaluating the quality of the presentation rather than the quality of the solution.  As we know, some people are very good at presenting, and some are not quite as good.  You would think that sales engineers have all mastered the art of the presentation, but they are not all made equal and some can be better than others.  Try to evaluate the actual solution and not how good the SE is (and that can be hard to do!).

One last note about the demo evaluation:  if the vendor is now showing you what you want to see (even if this should have been made clear before the presentation begins), make sure to let them know, and they can probably adjust the focus of their presentation.

Logistics
If the vendors are coming for an on-site visit, find out of they need an Internet connection.  Also make sure you have a working projector!

A Note for the Vendors Reading This
Don’t rely on the internet connection mentioned above.  Bring your solution installed on a laptop, or even bring a server with you if you need it, but don’t count on this connection to work or to be stable!

Adding the Scores
We now have scores for the RFPs and the demos.  Adding them should reflect who the winner should be.  There are a few more steps before selecting this winner, but once the demos are completed, you should have a good idea of who the preferred vendor is.  Just as with the RFP, I would recommend a debrief following the demos to discuss impressions, strengths, weaknesses, likes, dislikes, etc.  If you had more than 2 vendors presenting, I would recommend selecting the top two vendors for the next steps.

Next Steps
We’re almost there…  we still have to do our due diligence and perform reference checks before we start contract negotiations. I will discuss this in my next post.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Resource Center
SPM Vendor Selection Part 5: Reference Calls