Vue Software

Tag Archive for 'SPM Vendor'

CellarStone Releases New SPM solution: EasyCommission

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (16 votes, average: 2.19 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

EasyCommission is a new on-demand application for small companies.  The press release claims that it is very flexible and easy to use.

But as we discussed before, flexibility often comes at the expense of complexity.  In this first release of the application, many features were kept out, presumable to make the application easier to use.  For example, it does not support quota based commissions, draws/caps, and splits between more than 2 payees.  It also does not provide any e-mail capability.

Maybe we’ll have a review coming up… But for now, if you are curious to see what the application looks like, there are plenty of screen captures here.

What I find very interesting about EasyCommission is the pricing model; I haven’t seen this in any other SaaS solution.

There is a free edition that sets a limit of 1 administrator and 4 reps.  This free version limits “advanced functionality” and there is no support.  The economy edition has a limit of 19 reps.  Again, functionality is limited and support is on a “per incident basis”.  Finally, the regular version unlocks all the features, and full support is included.  What I find very interesting, is that with the free and economy editions, users will be shown advertising within the application.

CellarStone also offers a more robust solution called QCommission which can support up to 10,000 payees according to their website.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Sales Performance Management Solutions for ‘Very Small’ Sales Forces
It’s Varicent’s Turn to Report Record Revenues for 2007

Excentive Incentive Management Review

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (15 votes, average: 3.73 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Here is my latest Incentive Compensation Management application review. This week I am reviewing a relatively unknown (in North America) solution called Excentive Incentive Management.  Excentive was incorporated in 2002. Since then, they have gained a lot of popularity in France and have signed major clients such as Canon, Orange, and Air France. Earlier this year, they raised 700,000 Euros ($880,000 US) to accelerate international growth, part of over $1 million raised in recent months to fuel global expansion.

They also assembled an additional team driven by 10 seasoned managers active in the globalization of companies such as SAP, Hyperion, and OutlookSoft. One of their key target markets is of course North America, so we may soon start seeing some Excentive implementations over here if they can overcome some major challenges ahead, namely convincing prospective clients that they have the capability to deliver and support their implementations in the US, and that they are financially stable.

What is particularly interesting about the Excentive solution is that it includes performance management modules in addition to the sales performance solution. It makes it easy to compensate employees based on MBO campaigns. It’s a very flexible solution which can be a good option for as few as 50 payees, to as many as 50,000 payees, and it can be deployed on-premise or hosted.  Excentive Incentive Management is deployed across industries, and some implementations can process as many as 2 million transactions daily.

From the “regular” employee perspective, the application mostly consists of a repository of reports. These reports can be configured and customized by an administrator, but standard reports exist for most common information such as commission statements and performance review results.

Employees can also see the details of their compensation plans and can easily find out which commission was paid and find out if any transactions are missing.

Managers have access to additional information such as their team’s performance, salaries, etc.

Managers can also consult their employee’s records containing information about their past performance such as commissions earned in previous periods.

In addition to reports, managers can edit some of their team’s information including new salary figures, bonus values, based on constraints configured by the administrators.

One of the biggest features for managers is to be able to provide rating for their employees’ performance and to reuse all that info in a salary review process or a stock option allocation exercise, which are also supported by Excentive.

Finally, let’s look at some of the configuration of the solution, from the administrator’s perspective.
“Campaigns”, or the performance management component, can be configured in a few clicks from the campaigns menu.

Bonus and commission rules can be configured easily in a 3-step process. First, the properties of the rule are setup which includes the name of the rule and the dates for which it is effective. The rules engine can thus access the quantitative data (eg. sales by product/territory/period , margins, etc) as well as the quantitative performance indicators (eg. team spirit, customer loyalty, etc). This allows the calculation of the incentive (commission) as well as the bonus. Rules can be used for the classic earnings calculations as well as for recommendations and simulations.

The criteria step consists of specifying the conditions which must be met for the commission to fire.
This formula can be typed in, or created by clicking on the functions and other information stored in the database.

The resulting calculation is configured in the same way as the condition.

The reports we have looked at so far were all numbers presented in a tabular format, but it’s also possible to integrate visual elements to dashboards and reports.

Excentive’s solution also includes integrated modules to perform more complex tasks:

  • Hierarchy Manager: combine different dimensions such as region/office/people into multiple hierarchies necessary for workflow and approval processes.
  • Pool Manager: create teams and delegate ‘people-to-team’ assignments to local managers.
  • Mobility Manager: spot team changes and transfer people between departments/managers. Manage partial, time and team depending compensations
  • Culture Manager associate people with language, currency, location
  • Environment Manager which is a secure and fast way to move an application change from a development environment towards a test or production environment

Overall, Excentive is a slick web based application which shows a lot of promise if they can inspire enough trust from prospective clients. Since all modules are integrated in one solution at no additional cost, Excentive could be a good play for clients looking for not only incentive compensation management, but the entire spectrum of salary and performance management. Now could be a good time to negotiate a favorable price from the vendor, given that they are aggressively trying to enter this North American market.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Excentive
Merced Systems

Which SPM Vendor “Sucks” the Most?

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (5 votes, average: 4.8 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Every day some people are landing on LeapComp by searching for “[vendor name] sucks”, “which SPM vendor sucks”, etc. I thought I would share my perspective on this matter. I think I probably got some attention?

I don’t think that any sales performance compensation vendor can claim that 100% of their customers are very satisfied with their solution. There is often at least a few people who have had a bad experience and like to believe that it’s all the vendor’s fault.  So what else can cause an SPM project to fail?

Look in your own yard
Did you nail down the requirements properly? Was the scope well defined and communicated? Did the scope slowly creep up until the project was an entirely different beast? Did new requirements enter the picture? Did you support the implementation team adequately by providing them with all the documentation, information, access to subject matter experts, etc, in a timely manner? Did your team provide the required help when necessary and actively helped out with the implementation efforts? Was the schedule reasonable or did you have try to cut corners by skipping over some planning or testing efforts?

Not the right solution?
So maybe from your implementation-support perspective, everything was flawless. So could the problem be that the solution you selected didn’t meet your needs? If you do a poor job at defining the project scope and high level requirements before selection a commercial solution, how will you know if it really meet your needs. Ahh, but that’s the Catch 22! How are you supposed to really know all your needs without knowing more about the solutions? Maybe you KNOW that you want to do analytics, but you don’t really know what the application can do for you exactly… So you end up selecting a solution claiming to have best-of-breed analytics only to realize that it can’t do what you want. Read my vendor selection posts for more ideas on how to select the vendor who will best meet your needs. Hint: I think it’s a good idea to get help from someone who knows what they are talking about and who have worked with many SPM solutions… but I could be biased, that’s one of the things I do for a living.

Maybe it was your implementation partner that was not so great?
Could you do all this and still have a failed project? Yes! You spent all this time selecting a vendor, but how much time did you spent selecting an implementation partner? Maybe you just assumed that a big system integrator like Accenture and Deloitte were the best because they are already working with your company on other projects. Or maybe you selected the cheapest company on the block. Maybe you just selected the vendor’s implementation team thinking they must be those who know their products the best. I would assert that even more important than selecting the right solution, you must ensure that there is a good fit with the implementation partner you select. After you choose a solution, you won’t need many interactions with the vendor; but with the system integrator, you will need to work with them for some time! Do your homework, check their references, find out other companies who have used their services and ask them about the outcome of the project. I wrote another short piece about choosing an implementation partner where I discuss some pros and cons of large companies, versus vendors, versus boutique consulting firms.

In conclusion, before deciding to exclude a vendor from your search based on some horror story, consider that any failure to an enterprise system integration can be caused by many factors, and that the vendor is [usually] never fully responsible for the failure.  Also make sure that you select the best implementation partner.  Finally, support them well during the implementation.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Resource Center
SPM Vendor Selection Part 5: Reference Calls