Vue Software

Tag Archive for 'Varicent'

Sales Performance Management Vendors List

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (9 votes, average: 2.78 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

If you did some research about potential sales performance management / enterprise incentive management solutions for your company already, you will have read about some of the top players in that space.  However, there are dozens of SPM solutions that are not as easy to come across, because they are very focused on a specific industry, because they are new in the space, or simply because their web presence may not be what it should be.

I recently worked on a vendor’s guide for OpenSymmetry, profiling 15 leading solutions, many of which I have reviewed on this blog.  These vendors were included based on their client base, corporate recognition, and their contribution to the field of SPM.  They are:

  • ACTEK: ACom3
  • Callidus Software: Callidus Product Suite (TrueComp)
  • Centive: Compel
  • CSSI: Vue Software
  • Enterprise Incentive Software: CATS
  • Glow Teknologies: GloCent
  • Merced Systems: Merced Incentive Management
  • nGenera: nGen Comp
  • Oracle: Oracle Incentive Compensation (OIC)
  • SAP: HR Enterprise Compensation
  • SunGard: iWorks EIM
  • Varicent Software: Varicent SPM
  • Versata Software: Versata Commission
  • Xactly Corporation: Incent
  • ZS Associates: Javelin

I mentioned before that the Sales Performance Management market is seeing an explosion of new solutions to satisfy everybody’s needs.  I also listed 39 additional vendors offering a flavor of incentive compensation within their solution.   With a total of 54 Incentive Compensation solutions, a number which I suspect will keep growing - especially if the economy recovers - it can be a real challenge to find the best solution for your needs.

I can’t share the guide on my blog, but since I put some effort into it, if you send me an email at julien.dionne@opensymmetry.com or call me at 713-819-3979, I will be glad to send you a copy.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
SPM Vendor Selection Part 2: Shortlisting SPM Vendors
Insurance ICM Industry Market Overview

SPM Vendor Selection Part 4: Vendor Demos / Interviews

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

In my opinion, this is the most important and valuable part of the sales performance management vendor selection process.  The demos can take different forms; for a small on-demand project, these demos are often performed online.  For a large implementation, the remaining competing vendors will usually send a team on-site to present.  This is the first opportunity to really see the look and feel of the solution. The RFP scores of the invited vendors could be very close, so this is where they get the chance to distinguish themselves.  A job candidate is rarely hired without a face-to-face interview; this is it!

How long should the demo last?
A small SaaS solution such as Xactly or Centive could be presented in a few hours, but it really depends on the complexity of the solution.  The length of the demo also depends on how much time you have and how much time the vendor is willing to invest in trying to win the bid.  My advice is that for a large implementation (Callidus, Varicent, Merced, etc) half a day could be enough for an overview of the application, and a full day is not too much to go a bit more in details.

What questions should be asked?
SPM Vendor should be given specific instructions on what they should be demonstrating, which could vary depending on the audience.  Ask yourself what is of interest to the evaluators; the plan configuration and administration?  Reports?  Analytics?  If the evaluators are managers / directors, showing how the configuration plan elements is done may not be necessary.

Demo Scripts
The best way to find out that an SPM solution can do what you would like it to do, is to ask the vendors to configure a few plans.  Don’t only provide the plan details, also provide some sample data.  The sample data only needs to be a few transactions, there is no point in providing hundreds of them.  When the vendors walk you through their solution and results, it will provide a good overview of how their solution works.  If you choose to ask the vendors to implement a few things for the demo, provide them with at least a week to work on them to ensure they have the time to complete the activity.  It’s fair to ask them to create simple rules “on the spot”, or to modify some of their plans, but if you ask them to implement several plans during the demo, valuable time will be wasted.  Also, keep in mind that the goal is to review the solution, and not the ability of the sales engineer to work under high pressure.

Demo Evaluation
Just like for the RFP, a scoring grid should be created ahead of time and distributed to all the evaluators.  Another tip; leave a lot of space for comments.  If the evaluators have laptops, they could even fill the evaluation in a spreadsheet.  It’s never fun to do manual data entry if it can be avoided.  A question I often get is how much should the demo evaluation be worth compared to the RFP.  This is another “it depends” answer.  Typically, I recommend that the evaluation be worth at least 50% of the total score; if it’s a full day demonstration, probably more…  for a short online demonstration, probably less.

When evaluating the different demos, beware of evaluating the quality of the presentation rather than the quality of the solution.  As we know, some people are very good at presenting, and some are not quite as good.  You would think that sales engineers have all mastered the art of the presentation, but they are not all made equal and some can be better than others.  Try to evaluate the actual solution and not how good the SE is (and that can be hard to do!).

One last note about the demo evaluation:  if the vendor is now showing you what you want to see (even if this should have been made clear before the presentation begins), make sure to let them know, and they can probably adjust the focus of their presentation.

Logistics
If the vendors are coming for an on-site visit, find out of they need an Internet connection.  Also make sure you have a working projector!

A Note for the Vendors Reading This
Don’t rely on the internet connection mentioned above.  Bring your solution installed on a laptop, or even bring a server with you if you need it, but don’t count on this connection to work or to be stable!

Adding the Scores
We now have scores for the RFPs and the demos.  Adding them should reflect who the winner should be.  There are a few more steps before selecting this winner, but once the demos are completed, you should have a good idea of who the preferred vendor is.  Just as with the RFP, I would recommend a debrief following the demos to discuss impressions, strengths, weaknesses, likes, dislikes, etc.  If you had more than 2 vendors presenting, I would recommend selecting the top two vendors for the next steps.

Next Steps
We’re almost there…  we still have to do our due diligence and perform reference checks before we start contract negotiations. I will discuss this in my next post.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Resource Center
SPM Vendor Selection Part 5: Reference Calls

Anonymous Incentive Compensation Vendors Webinar

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

I try to make my blog as independent as possible from my job. I try to share some knowledge about the compensation management industry, various SPM vendors, best practices, etc. However, sometimes there is a fine line between both, since they are so closely related. This is one of those times I will cross the line and blur this distinction, to promote an event hosted by OpenSymmetry. Why am I promoting this event? Because the event is free, because it’s directly related to what I believe you care about, and because my boss said that if I didn’t…  I’m joking.

“We” are hosting a series of webinars where leading sales performance management solutions will be demonstrated in an anonymous setting.

Participants of the webinars will learn about:
– Which functionality are offered by each sales performance management solution
– What key characteristics distinguishes solutions from each other
– Under which conditions and requirements are the solutions expected to provided the best value
– How compensation plans can be configured and maintained within each solution
– Which other important features such as reporting and modeling are available with each tool
Convinced? If not, here are a few more reasons for participating:
  • If you don’t have a compensation system at the moment, but if your company could use one “some day”, that will give you the best possible overview of the solutions on the market.
  • Even if your company could not care less for an SPM solution, maybe you will end up in a role where the knowledge of these solutions will be important, and maybe give you a competitive edge.
  • Even if you don’t work in a role that is related to compensation, knowing about these systems could open up some doors, some day.
  • If you DO have a comp system, why not find out about the other solutions on the market. Maybe you will learn how things could be done differently, maybe its time to change to another system, maybe its just fun to compare the strengths and weaknesses of your current system compared to other solutions.
  • The demo is “anonymous”. I’m guessing you might get a friendly follow up call from OpenSymmetry, but no pressure selling from the vendors.
  • If some day you would like to work at OpenSymmetry, I imagine having some knowledge of various incentive compensation systems would be an asset.

Ok… So I *know* how many readers I get on this blog every day. I also *know* that many come to this blog to read what I have to say about the various solutions. And finally, I *know* that not even half of my readers signed up for these webinars. Maybe this is because I’m doing a too good job at reviewing the applications here, and that you feel you don’t need to see them, but I’m telling you, seeing the systems in action is what is really needed to truly appreciate what they can do.

Here are the dates of the webinars:
October 16th: Varicent
October 20th: Merced Systems
October 23rd: ZS Associates
October 27th: Xactly
October 30th: Versata
November 3rd: nGenera
November 6th: Callidus Software
The only thing you need to do to participate is to signup.  It’s free…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
How and Why Symantec overhauled their legacy recognition program
LeapComp Launches Incentive Compensation Event Calendar

Jumping around?! What’s going on? - Fact Check

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

I learned a valuable lesson today - do not trust everything the media wants you to believe.

My previous post inaccurately stated that Callidus lost a VP to Varicent.  WRONG! Andrew Armstrong left Callidus in December 2007 and later joined the Aiimi/ReThink Group:

Andrew Armstrong, Sales Director, Aiimi (trading as RPS)
Andrew joined Aiimi in April 2008, having previously held Vice President Europe, Middle East and Africa and Vice President Asia positions at Callidus Software Inc. Andrew’s particular remit is to assist Aiimi in diversifying beyond financial services into other industries using performance and incentive management software, such as telecommunications, pharmaceuticals, utilities and the public sector.

Varicent… wasn’t that press release a bit misleading?

Tags: , ,

Related Posts:
Jumping around?! What’s going on?
Temporary Emergency Measures Include NO Carry-on Bags to U.S.A.

Jumping around?! What’s going on?

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (3 votes, average: 2.33 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Two press releases caught my attention this week.

So Callidus loses a VP to Varicent, but takes one from Xactly.

This tells me that either there is MORE collaboration between SPM companies than I believed, or (probably more likely) that there is fierce competition between SPM companies trying to steal each other’s top-guns.

So who needs a VP?

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Jumping around?! What’s going on? - Fact Check
What’s new at OpenSymmetry - Business Transformation Consulting and Sales Compensation Design Services

MarketScope for Sales Incentive Compensation Management Software 2008

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 3 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Michael Dunne, the VP of research and sales incentive compensation analyst for Gartner, released the new marketscope research on July 30, 2008.

One of his key finding; the sales ICM market grew by 20% in 2007, up from 15% in 2006.  Another interesting fact: collectively, the vendor community only captured 300 million in revenue worldwide. Finally, less than 10% of sales organizations with more than 100 persons receiving variable compensation have deployed prepackaged sales applications, with North America representing more than 80% of the world market.

My interpretation of this is that the ICM market is still very small, still has a lot of room to grow, and has an accelerating growth.  That’s great news for me!

The biggest changes in the overall marketscope rating since 2007 is Varicent which moved up a position, from “promising” to “positive”, and Practique Associates (recently acquired by Merced Systems) which moved up from “Caution” to “Promising”.  This year, ACTEK and Westport Software (now Enterprise Incentive Software) did not meet the inclusion criterion for signing new customers.  There is also a new name on the list - ZS Associates.

I asked Gartner if I could share their ICM Vendor Matrix on this blog, but they refused.  However, I collected the related press releases:

I did not find publicly available information regarding Xactly, ZS Associates and SAP’s ranking.

The rating is based on overall viability, customer experience, products and services, market responsiveness, track record and geographic strategy.  Gartner’s definition for a positive rating is “Demonstrate strength in specific areas, but execution in one or more areas may still be developing or inconsistent with other areas of performance”.  A promising rating is defined as “Shows potential in specific areas; however, execution is inconsistent”.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts:
Insurance Incentive Compensation Management Applications
Enterprise Incentive Management News